PFSCL剃刀触发器的实现

R. Agrawal, N. Pandey, K. Gupta
{"title":"PFSCL剃刀触发器的实现","authors":"R. Agrawal, N. Pandey, K. Gupta","doi":"10.1109/ICCMC.2017.8282627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a Razor flipflop is implemented using three different methods based on Positive Feedback Source Coupled Logic (PFSCL); universal gates, triple-tail cell and tristate buffer. The performance of the proposed methods is differentiated on the basis of power consumption, propagation delay, area and power-delay product. It has been concluded that the architecture based on triple-tail cell performed better in terms of power consumption by 66.67% while tristate buffer based architecture outperformed the other methods in terms of propagation delay by 60.23%. The tristate buffer based architecture also requires the least overhead area among the three proposed methods. The propagation delays of the three methods have been observed at various frequencies. While the propagation delay of universal gates based method increases with increasing frequency, the propagation delay of the other two methods do not vary with changing frequencies. This makes the triple-tail cell based and tristate buffer based method suitable for operation at high frequencies. The results have been verified through SPICE simulations using 0.18 micrometer CMOS technology parameters.","PeriodicalId":163288,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC)","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of PFSCL razor flipflop\",\"authors\":\"R. Agrawal, N. Pandey, K. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCMC.2017.8282627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a Razor flipflop is implemented using three different methods based on Positive Feedback Source Coupled Logic (PFSCL); universal gates, triple-tail cell and tristate buffer. The performance of the proposed methods is differentiated on the basis of power consumption, propagation delay, area and power-delay product. It has been concluded that the architecture based on triple-tail cell performed better in terms of power consumption by 66.67% while tristate buffer based architecture outperformed the other methods in terms of propagation delay by 60.23%. The tristate buffer based architecture also requires the least overhead area among the three proposed methods. The propagation delays of the three methods have been observed at various frequencies. While the propagation delay of universal gates based method increases with increasing frequency, the propagation delay of the other two methods do not vary with changing frequencies. This makes the triple-tail cell based and tristate buffer based method suitable for operation at high frequencies. The results have been verified through SPICE simulations using 0.18 micrometer CMOS technology parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC)\",\"volume\":\"224 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCMC.2017.8282627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCMC.2017.8282627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文基于正反馈源耦合逻辑(PFSCL),采用三种不同的方法实现了Razor触发器;通用门,三尾电池和三态缓冲器。基于功耗、传播延迟、面积和功率延迟积对所提方法的性能进行了区分。结果表明,基于三尾单元的架构在功耗方面优于其他方法66.67%,而基于三状态缓冲区的架构在传播延迟方面优于其他方法60.23%。在三种提出的方法中,基于三状态缓冲区的体系结构所需的开销面积最小。在不同频率下观察了三种方法的传播延迟。通用门方法的传输延迟随频率的增加而增加,而其他两种方法的传输延迟不随频率变化。这使得基于三尾单元和基于三态缓冲器的方法适用于高频操作。采用0.18微米CMOS工艺参数,通过SPICE仿真验证了结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of PFSCL razor flipflop
In this paper, a Razor flipflop is implemented using three different methods based on Positive Feedback Source Coupled Logic (PFSCL); universal gates, triple-tail cell and tristate buffer. The performance of the proposed methods is differentiated on the basis of power consumption, propagation delay, area and power-delay product. It has been concluded that the architecture based on triple-tail cell performed better in terms of power consumption by 66.67% while tristate buffer based architecture outperformed the other methods in terms of propagation delay by 60.23%. The tristate buffer based architecture also requires the least overhead area among the three proposed methods. The propagation delays of the three methods have been observed at various frequencies. While the propagation delay of universal gates based method increases with increasing frequency, the propagation delay of the other two methods do not vary with changing frequencies. This makes the triple-tail cell based and tristate buffer based method suitable for operation at high frequencies. The results have been verified through SPICE simulations using 0.18 micrometer CMOS technology parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信