难以分辨的容忍争论

The Bounds of Possibility Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1093/oso/9780192846655.003.0015

C. Dorr, J. Hawthorne, Juhani Yli-Vakkuri

{"title":"难以分辨的容忍争论","authors":"C. Dorr, J. Hawthorne, Juhani Yli-Vakkuri","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192846655.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the first of two chapters devoted to a special subclass of Tolerance Puzzles based on ‘indiscernible modality’, on which qualitative truths are automatically necesssary. The interest in these puzzles lies in the fact that there is a distinctive argument for Non-contingency based on the premise that properties like being a table are qualitative. This chapter explores the options for resolving the puzzles compatible with accepting that premise, and hence Non-contingency for indiscernible modality.","PeriodicalId":324490,"journal":{"name":"The Bounds of Possibility","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indiscernible Tolerance Arguments\",\"authors\":\"C. Dorr, J. Hawthorne, Juhani Yli-Vakkuri\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192846655.003.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is the first of two chapters devoted to a special subclass of Tolerance Puzzles based on ‘indiscernible modality’, on which qualitative truths are automatically necesssary. The interest in these puzzles lies in the fact that there is a distinctive argument for Non-contingency based on the premise that properties like being a table are qualitative. This chapter explores the options for resolving the puzzles compatible with accepting that premise, and hence Non-contingency for indiscernible modality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bounds of Possibility\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bounds of Possibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846655.003.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bounds of Possibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846655.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这是两个章节的第一章，专门讨论基于“不可分辨模态”的容忍谜题的一个特殊子类，在这个子类上，定性真理是自动必要的。这些谜题的有趣之处在于，有一个关于非偶然性的独特论证，其前提是，像表这样的属性是定性的。本章探讨了解决与接受这一前提相容的谜题的选项，因此，不可分辨的模态的非偶然性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Indiscernible Tolerance Arguments

This is the first of two chapters devoted to a special subclass of Tolerance Puzzles based on ‘indiscernible modality’, on which qualitative truths are automatically necesssary. The interest in these puzzles lies in the fact that there is a distinctive argument for Non-contingency based on the premise that properties like being a table are qualitative. This chapter explores the options for resolving the puzzles compatible with accepting that premise, and hence Non-contingency for indiscernible modality.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Bounds of Possibility

自引率

0.00%

发文量