二元因变量预测技术的有效性比较

Tianxiang Cao, Xin Song, Jun Wang
{"title":"二元因变量预测技术的有效性比较","authors":"Tianxiang Cao, Xin Song, Jun Wang","doi":"10.1109/ISCIT55906.2022.9931323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Invoice Disputes Team wants to identify further opportunities to reduce invoice disputes and the team would like to explore whether data analytics can drive further improvements. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of the eight approaches to predict binary dependent variables according to the specified data. The techniques examined are Logistic Regression, Probit Regression, CHAID, CART, Neural Networks, Bagging, Random Forests and Boosting. This paper describes the data set, the effectiveness measures used and the approaches, and also shows the results for each of the eight approaches that are examined. The simulation results show that both Bagging and Random forests seem to do better than other approaches.","PeriodicalId":325919,"journal":{"name":"2022 21st International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Techniques for Predicting Binary Dependent Variables\",\"authors\":\"Tianxiang Cao, Xin Song, Jun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCIT55906.2022.9931323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Invoice Disputes Team wants to identify further opportunities to reduce invoice disputes and the team would like to explore whether data analytics can drive further improvements. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of the eight approaches to predict binary dependent variables according to the specified data. The techniques examined are Logistic Regression, Probit Regression, CHAID, CART, Neural Networks, Bagging, Random Forests and Boosting. This paper describes the data set, the effectiveness measures used and the approaches, and also shows the results for each of the eight approaches that are examined. The simulation results show that both Bagging and Random forests seem to do better than other approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 21st International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 21st International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCIT55906.2022.9931323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 21st International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCIT55906.2022.9931323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发票争议团队希望找到更多的机会来减少发票争议,团队希望探索数据分析是否可以推动进一步的改进。本文的目的是比较根据指定数据预测二元因变量的八种方法的有效性。研究的技术包括逻辑回归、概率回归、CHAID、CART、神经网络、Bagging、随机森林和Boosting。本文描述了数据集、使用的有效性度量和方法,并显示了所检查的八种方法中的每种方法的结果。仿真结果表明,套袋法和随机森林法似乎都比其他方法效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Techniques for Predicting Binary Dependent Variables
The Invoice Disputes Team wants to identify further opportunities to reduce invoice disputes and the team would like to explore whether data analytics can drive further improvements. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of the eight approaches to predict binary dependent variables according to the specified data. The techniques examined are Logistic Regression, Probit Regression, CHAID, CART, Neural Networks, Bagging, Random Forests and Boosting. This paper describes the data set, the effectiveness measures used and the approaches, and also shows the results for each of the eight approaches that are examined. The simulation results show that both Bagging and Random forests seem to do better than other approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信