伦理学和关键安全研究

M. McDonald
{"title":"伦理学和关键安全研究","authors":"M. McDonald","doi":"10.4324/9781315725932-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethical and normative concerns are central to critical security studies. While hardly constituting a coherent intellectual project, theorists working in this broad tradition generally ground their analyses in a critique of traditional security conceptions and practices in international relations. This chapter outlines both the key contours of critical security studies scholarship broadly and the unifying features of this approach. It illustrates key axes of difference and contestation through a more specific focus on those who endorse emancipation and those who approach the study of security through the securitisation framework. The chapter presents the ethical assumptions underpinning these approaches and key points of both agreement and disagreement regarding their vision of the relationship between ethics and security. It suggests that different visions of the politics of security are central to this distinction. The chapter reflects on how this discussion contributes to broader normative political theory.","PeriodicalId":372374,"journal":{"name":"Routledge Handbook of Ethics and International Relations","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics and critical security studies\",\"authors\":\"M. McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315725932-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ethical and normative concerns are central to critical security studies. While hardly constituting a coherent intellectual project, theorists working in this broad tradition generally ground their analyses in a critique of traditional security conceptions and practices in international relations. This chapter outlines both the key contours of critical security studies scholarship broadly and the unifying features of this approach. It illustrates key axes of difference and contestation through a more specific focus on those who endorse emancipation and those who approach the study of security through the securitisation framework. The chapter presents the ethical assumptions underpinning these approaches and key points of both agreement and disagreement regarding their vision of the relationship between ethics and security. It suggests that different visions of the politics of security are central to this distinction. The chapter reflects on how this discussion contributes to broader normative political theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Routledge Handbook of Ethics and International Relations\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Routledge Handbook of Ethics and International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725932-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Routledge Handbook of Ethics and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725932-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伦理和规范问题是关键安全研究的核心。虽然很难构成一个连贯的智力项目,但在这一广泛传统中工作的理论家通常将他们的分析建立在对传统安全概念和国际关系实践的批评之上。本章概括地概述了关键安全研究学术的关键轮廓和这种方法的统一特征。它通过更具体地关注那些支持解放的人和那些通过证券化框架来研究安全的人,说明了差异和争论的关键轴线。本章提出了支撑这些方法的伦理假设,以及关于他们对伦理与安全之间关系的看法的一致和不同的关键点。它表明,对安全政治的不同看法是这种区别的核心。本章反映了这种讨论如何有助于更广泛的规范政治理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethics and critical security studies
Ethical and normative concerns are central to critical security studies. While hardly constituting a coherent intellectual project, theorists working in this broad tradition generally ground their analyses in a critique of traditional security conceptions and practices in international relations. This chapter outlines both the key contours of critical security studies scholarship broadly and the unifying features of this approach. It illustrates key axes of difference and contestation through a more specific focus on those who endorse emancipation and those who approach the study of security through the securitisation framework. The chapter presents the ethical assumptions underpinning these approaches and key points of both agreement and disagreement regarding their vision of the relationship between ethics and security. It suggests that different visions of the politics of security are central to this distinction. The chapter reflects on how this discussion contributes to broader normative political theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信