在有限的空间内快速排名

Alistair Moffat, J. Zobel
{"title":"在有限的空间内快速排名","authors":"Alistair Moffat, J. Zobel","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.1994.283064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ranking techniques have long been suggested as alternatives to conventional Boolean methods for searching document collections. The cost of computing a ranking is, however, greater than the cost of performing a Boolean search, in terms of both memory space and processing time. The authors consider the resources required by the cosine method of ranking, and show that, with a careful application of indexing and selection techniques, both the space and the time required by ranking can be substantially reduced. The methods described in the paper have been used to build a retrieval system with which it is possible to process ranked queries of 40 terms in about 5% of the space required by previous implementations; in as little as 25% of the time; and without measurable degradation in retrieval effectiveness.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":142465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast ranking in limited space\",\"authors\":\"Alistair Moffat, J. Zobel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDE.1994.283064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ranking techniques have long been suggested as alternatives to conventional Boolean methods for searching document collections. The cost of computing a ranking is, however, greater than the cost of performing a Boolean search, in terms of both memory space and processing time. The authors consider the resources required by the cosine method of ranking, and show that, with a careful application of indexing and selection techniques, both the space and the time required by ranking can be substantially reduced. The methods described in the paper have been used to build a retrieval system with which it is possible to process ranked queries of 40 terms in about 5% of the space required by previous implementations; in as little as 25% of the time; and without measurable degradation in retrieval effectiveness.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":142465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1994.283064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1994.283064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

长期以来,人们一直建议将排序技术作为搜索文档集合的传统布尔方法的替代方法。然而,就内存空间和处理时间而言,计算排名的成本要大于执行布尔搜索的成本。作者考虑了余弦排序法所需的资源,并表明,通过仔细应用索引和选择技术,排序所需的空间和时间都可以大大减少。本文中描述的方法已被用于构建一个检索系统,该系统可以在以前实现所需的约5%的空间内处理40个术语的排序查询;在25%的时间内;并且在检索效率方面没有可测量的退化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fast ranking in limited space
Ranking techniques have long been suggested as alternatives to conventional Boolean methods for searching document collections. The cost of computing a ranking is, however, greater than the cost of performing a Boolean search, in terms of both memory space and processing time. The authors consider the resources required by the cosine method of ranking, and show that, with a careful application of indexing and selection techniques, both the space and the time required by ranking can be substantially reduced. The methods described in the paper have been used to build a retrieval system with which it is possible to process ranked queries of 40 terms in about 5% of the space required by previous implementations; in as little as 25% of the time; and without measurable degradation in retrieval effectiveness.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信