{"title":"从圣经和释经看宗教与科学的二分法","authors":"Archibald L.H.M. van Wieringen","doi":"10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nIn fact, the rise of empirical approaches in the 16th and 17th century has led, on the one hand, to a dichotomy between empirical and non-empirical thinking, and, on the other hand, to a use of empirical methods for non-empirical questions (and sometimes the other way around). In this article, I wish to address both aspects related to theology, and to Bible and exegesis in particular.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":131385,"journal":{"name":"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dichotomy between Religion and Science from the Perspective of Bible and Exegesis\",\"authors\":\"Archibald L.H.M. van Wieringen\",\"doi\":\"10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\nIn fact, the rise of empirical approaches in the 16th and 17th century has led, on the one hand, to a dichotomy between empirical and non-empirical thinking, and, on the other hand, to a use of empirical methods for non-empirical questions (and sometimes the other way around). In this article, I wish to address both aspects related to theology, and to Bible and exegesis in particular.\\n\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":131385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dichotomy between Religion and Science from the Perspective of Bible and Exegesis
In fact, the rise of empirical approaches in the 16th and 17th century has led, on the one hand, to a dichotomy between empirical and non-empirical thinking, and, on the other hand, to a use of empirical methods for non-empirical questions (and sometimes the other way around). In this article, I wish to address both aspects related to theology, and to Bible and exegesis in particular.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
