{"title":"计算机伦理问题的实际管理","authors":"John W. T. Smith","doi":"10.1145/1098867.1098868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are three forms of deception that can involve people in information technology. These are misidentification, misattribution (plagiarism), and misinformation. A keystone to the openness of the academic culture is that of accountability. We tolerate wide ranges of inquiry and interpretation as long as we have the opportunity to question the holder of an unconventional or controversial position. Whether in the form of a lie or a half-truth, deceit is anathema to scholarship.","PeriodicalId":168438,"journal":{"name":"ACM Siguccs Newsletter","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical management of computer ethics problems\",\"authors\":\"John W. T. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1098867.1098868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are three forms of deception that can involve people in information technology. These are misidentification, misattribution (plagiarism), and misinformation. A keystone to the openness of the academic culture is that of accountability. We tolerate wide ranges of inquiry and interpretation as long as we have the opportunity to question the holder of an unconventional or controversial position. Whether in the form of a lie or a half-truth, deceit is anathema to scholarship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Siguccs Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Siguccs Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1098867.1098868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Siguccs Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1098867.1098868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
There are three forms of deception that can involve people in information technology. These are misidentification, misattribution (plagiarism), and misinformation. A keystone to the openness of the academic culture is that of accountability. We tolerate wide ranges of inquiry and interpretation as long as we have the opportunity to question the holder of an unconventional or controversial position. Whether in the form of a lie or a half-truth, deceit is anathema to scholarship.