外语教师准备在新泽西州与七个孩子一起工作

Svitlana Shumaieva
{"title":"外语教师准备在新泽西州与七个孩子一起工作","authors":"Svitlana Shumaieva","doi":"10.31499/2706-6258.1(7).2022.261217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes two university training programs for future teachers in New Jersey in accordance with the conditions of obtaining a diploma from the State Department of Education. As a result of the study, it was founded that the respondents’ understanding of the essence of working with students with special needs changed during the experiment. The university teacher’s training program General Program 101 (Gen Ed 101) does not provide adequate training, in contrast to the double degree program, which provides in-depth training, culminating in the defense of the diploma and teaching practice at school. Students in the double degree program had the opportunity to gain knowledge from two programs, compare them, and modify them to the specific cases they encounter during the internship under the guidance of teacher mentors. According to New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers and School Leaders (2004), they felt ready to work with children with special educational needs only after employment and in the process of working together with teachers-mentors. And those students who did not have SEN students in their classes did not receive practical skills for such work at all. Thus, mentoring is a powerful tool to help future teachers develop skills in inclusive classrooms, only a double degree program can prepare future foreign language teachers to work adequately with children with special needs, only personal experience and understanding between a foreign language teacher and a special teacher can become a guarantee of the most comfortable and fruitful atmosphere for children with special educational needs in the classroom. \nKeywords: special educational needs; inclusive environment; inclusion; SEN student; inclusive education; foreign language teachers; state standards; general training program.","PeriodicalId":146718,"journal":{"name":"Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Modern School","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHERS’ PREPARATION TO WORK WITH SEN CHILDREN IN NEW JERSEY\",\"authors\":\"Svitlana Shumaieva\",\"doi\":\"10.31499/2706-6258.1(7).2022.261217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes two university training programs for future teachers in New Jersey in accordance with the conditions of obtaining a diploma from the State Department of Education. As a result of the study, it was founded that the respondents’ understanding of the essence of working with students with special needs changed during the experiment. The university teacher’s training program General Program 101 (Gen Ed 101) does not provide adequate training, in contrast to the double degree program, which provides in-depth training, culminating in the defense of the diploma and teaching practice at school. Students in the double degree program had the opportunity to gain knowledge from two programs, compare them, and modify them to the specific cases they encounter during the internship under the guidance of teacher mentors. According to New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers and School Leaders (2004), they felt ready to work with children with special educational needs only after employment and in the process of working together with teachers-mentors. And those students who did not have SEN students in their classes did not receive practical skills for such work at all. Thus, mentoring is a powerful tool to help future teachers develop skills in inclusive classrooms, only a double degree program can prepare future foreign language teachers to work adequately with children with special needs, only personal experience and understanding between a foreign language teacher and a special teacher can become a guarantee of the most comfortable and fruitful atmosphere for children with special educational needs in the classroom. \\nKeywords: special educational needs; inclusive environment; inclusion; SEN student; inclusive education; foreign language teachers; state standards; general training program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Modern School\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Modern School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31499/2706-6258.1(7).2022.261217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Modern School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31499/2706-6258.1(7).2022.261217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文根据获得州教育部文凭的条件,分析了新泽西州两所大学对未来教师的培训方案。研究结果发现,在实验过程中,被调查者对特殊需要学生工作本质的理解发生了变化。与双学位课程相比,大学教师培训课程General program 101 (Gen Ed 101)没有提供足够的培训,双学位课程提供深入的培训,最终在学校为文凭辩护和教学实践。双学位项目的学生有机会从两个项目中获得知识,并在导师的指导下进行比较,并将其修改为实习过程中遇到的具体案例。根据新泽西州教师和学校领导专业标准(2004年),他们只有在就业后和与教师-导师一起工作的过程中,才感到准备好与有特殊教育需要的儿童一起工作。而那些班级里没有特殊教育学生的学生,根本就没有获得这些工作的实用技能。因此,辅导是帮助未来的教师在包容性课堂中发展技能的有力工具,只有双学位课程才能使未来的外语教师能够充分地与特殊需要的儿童一起工作,只有外语教师和特殊教师之间的个人经验和理解才能保证为特殊教育需要的儿童提供最舒适和富有成效的课堂氛围。关键词:特殊教育需求;包容的环境;夹杂物;森的学生;包容性的教育;外语教师;国家标准;一般培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHERS’ PREPARATION TO WORK WITH SEN CHILDREN IN NEW JERSEY
The article analyzes two university training programs for future teachers in New Jersey in accordance with the conditions of obtaining a diploma from the State Department of Education. As a result of the study, it was founded that the respondents’ understanding of the essence of working with students with special needs changed during the experiment. The university teacher’s training program General Program 101 (Gen Ed 101) does not provide adequate training, in contrast to the double degree program, which provides in-depth training, culminating in the defense of the diploma and teaching practice at school. Students in the double degree program had the opportunity to gain knowledge from two programs, compare them, and modify them to the specific cases they encounter during the internship under the guidance of teacher mentors. According to New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers and School Leaders (2004), they felt ready to work with children with special educational needs only after employment and in the process of working together with teachers-mentors. And those students who did not have SEN students in their classes did not receive practical skills for such work at all. Thus, mentoring is a powerful tool to help future teachers develop skills in inclusive classrooms, only a double degree program can prepare future foreign language teachers to work adequately with children with special needs, only personal experience and understanding between a foreign language teacher and a special teacher can become a guarantee of the most comfortable and fruitful atmosphere for children with special educational needs in the classroom. Keywords: special educational needs; inclusive environment; inclusion; SEN student; inclusive education; foreign language teachers; state standards; general training program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信