用于业务流程验证的概率方法:可达性、活动性和死锁检测

Mohamed Naoum, Outman El Hichami, Mohammed Al Achhab, Badr Eddine El Mohajir
{"title":"用于业务流程验证的概率方法:可达性、活动性和死锁检测","authors":"Mohamed Naoum, Outman El Hichami, Mohammed Al Achhab, Badr Eddine El Mohajir","doi":"10.1109/CIST.2016.7805029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we deal with business process verification for reachability, liveness and deadlock-freeness properties. Actual business process verification techniques use formal methods such as model checking that checks exhaustively temporal logics properties, however, in this case, the business process model must be mapped to an abstract mathematical model (like Petri nets, timed automata or process algebra) on which the verification process could be done. The fact that the verification is done on this second representation can fake the results if the transformation is either erroneous or over-constrained as well as if the proprieties are misspecified. In this article we illustrate that probability calculation can be used in business process verification by evaluating a disjunctive normal form of its conditions, moreover, the verification process could be done directly on the business process model and can handle all its functional elements. We have developed an application that numerically shows the performance of our proposed technique by verifying several workflows with various “known” flaws.","PeriodicalId":196827,"journal":{"name":"2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A probabilistic method for business process verification: Reachability, Liveness and deadlock detection\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Naoum, Outman El Hichami, Mohammed Al Achhab, Badr Eddine El Mohajir\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIST.2016.7805029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we deal with business process verification for reachability, liveness and deadlock-freeness properties. Actual business process verification techniques use formal methods such as model checking that checks exhaustively temporal logics properties, however, in this case, the business process model must be mapped to an abstract mathematical model (like Petri nets, timed automata or process algebra) on which the verification process could be done. The fact that the verification is done on this second representation can fake the results if the transformation is either erroneous or over-constrained as well as if the proprieties are misspecified. In this article we illustrate that probability calculation can be used in business process verification by evaluating a disjunctive normal form of its conditions, moreover, the verification process could be done directly on the business process model and can handle all its functional elements. We have developed an application that numerically shows the performance of our proposed technique by verifying several workflows with various “known” flaws.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIST.2016.7805029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIST.2016.7805029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们对业务流程的可达性、活动性和无死锁特性进行验证。实际的业务流程验证技术使用正式的方法,例如模型检查,它彻底检查时间逻辑属性,然而,在这种情况下,业务流程模型必须映射到一个抽象的数学模型(如Petri网、时间自动机或过程代数),验证过程可以在其上完成。如果转换是错误的或过度约束的,以及如果属性被错误指定,那么在第二个表示上进行验证的事实可能会伪造结果。在本文中,我们通过评估其条件的析取范式来说明概率计算可以用于业务流程验证,并且验证过程可以直接在业务流程模型上完成,并且可以处理其所有功能元素。我们已经开发了一个应用程序,该应用程序通过验证具有各种“已知”缺陷的几个工作流,在数字上显示了我们提出的技术的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A probabilistic method for business process verification: Reachability, Liveness and deadlock detection
In this paper we deal with business process verification for reachability, liveness and deadlock-freeness properties. Actual business process verification techniques use formal methods such as model checking that checks exhaustively temporal logics properties, however, in this case, the business process model must be mapped to an abstract mathematical model (like Petri nets, timed automata or process algebra) on which the verification process could be done. The fact that the verification is done on this second representation can fake the results if the transformation is either erroneous or over-constrained as well as if the proprieties are misspecified. In this article we illustrate that probability calculation can be used in business process verification by evaluating a disjunctive normal form of its conditions, moreover, the verification process could be done directly on the business process model and can handle all its functional elements. We have developed an application that numerically shows the performance of our proposed technique by verifying several workflows with various “known” flaws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信