优化实验室cEOR驱油评价,以评估初始油饱和度和流度比

Hendrik Foedisch, H. Abdullah, R. Hincapie, L. Ganzer
{"title":"优化实验室cEOR驱油评价,以评估初始油饱和度和流度比","authors":"Hendrik Foedisch, H. Abdullah, R. Hincapie, L. Ganzer","doi":"10.2118/190769-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We evaluate the polymer, surfactant and alkaline flooding performance in porous media by using an in-house innovative experimental setup. This, to reach an optimum experimental evaluation in an attempt to avoid repeated experimental failures reported in the literature. The workflow presented help us to understand the recorded data with high reliability and accuracy. Moreover, allow working at high temperatures and high salinities in order to mimic reservoir conditions.\n The evaluation undertaken in this paper comprises four main steps: 1) Fluids preparation and optimization, beginning with an extensive rheological evaluation to define the optimum concentration/composition of the fluids. 2) Calibration of pressure sensors and pumps, and detailed determination of the system's dead volume. 3) Routine core analysis was performed, which included measuring porosity, permeability and pore volume. 4) Spontaneous imbibition experiments, secondary and tertiary mode cEOR flooding experiments. The core flooding experiments were performed at a constant flow rate of 0.15ml/min (equivalent to the field conditions of 1ft/day), then followed by a bump rate after Sor is reached.\n The constructed setup proved to be beneficial on reducing the experimental failures by showing data reproducibility and precision. Small diameter tubings of 1/16″ minimized the dead volumes and core face differential pressure measurement allowed high accuracy at any injection rate. At elevated temperatures (50°C) polymer flooding in secondary mode showed 2% higher recovery compared to tertiary mode. Similar difference was observed at the ambient temperature. For the conditions evaluated in this work, HPAM polymer showed higher recoveries than those of Bio-polymer at higher temperatures. However, lower recoveries from HPAM were observed at lower temperatures. In terms of surfactant flooding experiments the observed performance is significantly better in secondary compared to tertiary mode, as well as facing significant production of emulsion from suboptimal surfactant solutions. Thoroughly examining these differences in recoveries, two key factors were considered to be of critical interest: initial oil saturation and mobility ratio. Moreover, CT scan imaging allowed assessing capillary end effects during oil saturation. A detailed comparison between dry and saturated core images was performed to insure no capillary end effects existed. Finally, a developed mathematical simulation model permitted to quality check the work and create a benchmark for further evaluations.\n The workflow presented in this paper helps to close the gaps often discussed in the literature with regards to flooding experimental failures at core plug scale. Thus, it can help fellow researchers to optimize their workflow and enhance the final results to aid in fluid evaluation and assessing the optimum cEOR process.","PeriodicalId":339784,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 12, 2018","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Laboratory cEOR Flooding Evaluations to Assess Initial Oil Saturation and Mobility Ratio\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Foedisch, H. Abdullah, R. Hincapie, L. Ganzer\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/190769-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We evaluate the polymer, surfactant and alkaline flooding performance in porous media by using an in-house innovative experimental setup. This, to reach an optimum experimental evaluation in an attempt to avoid repeated experimental failures reported in the literature. The workflow presented help us to understand the recorded data with high reliability and accuracy. Moreover, allow working at high temperatures and high salinities in order to mimic reservoir conditions.\\n The evaluation undertaken in this paper comprises four main steps: 1) Fluids preparation and optimization, beginning with an extensive rheological evaluation to define the optimum concentration/composition of the fluids. 2) Calibration of pressure sensors and pumps, and detailed determination of the system's dead volume. 3) Routine core analysis was performed, which included measuring porosity, permeability and pore volume. 4) Spontaneous imbibition experiments, secondary and tertiary mode cEOR flooding experiments. The core flooding experiments were performed at a constant flow rate of 0.15ml/min (equivalent to the field conditions of 1ft/day), then followed by a bump rate after Sor is reached.\\n The constructed setup proved to be beneficial on reducing the experimental failures by showing data reproducibility and precision. Small diameter tubings of 1/16″ minimized the dead volumes and core face differential pressure measurement allowed high accuracy at any injection rate. At elevated temperatures (50°C) polymer flooding in secondary mode showed 2% higher recovery compared to tertiary mode. Similar difference was observed at the ambient temperature. For the conditions evaluated in this work, HPAM polymer showed higher recoveries than those of Bio-polymer at higher temperatures. However, lower recoveries from HPAM were observed at lower temperatures. In terms of surfactant flooding experiments the observed performance is significantly better in secondary compared to tertiary mode, as well as facing significant production of emulsion from suboptimal surfactant solutions. Thoroughly examining these differences in recoveries, two key factors were considered to be of critical interest: initial oil saturation and mobility ratio. Moreover, CT scan imaging allowed assessing capillary end effects during oil saturation. A detailed comparison between dry and saturated core images was performed to insure no capillary end effects existed. Finally, a developed mathematical simulation model permitted to quality check the work and create a benchmark for further evaluations.\\n The workflow presented in this paper helps to close the gaps often discussed in the literature with regards to flooding experimental failures at core plug scale. Thus, it can help fellow researchers to optimize their workflow and enhance the final results to aid in fluid evaluation and assessing the optimum cEOR process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, June 12, 2018\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, June 12, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/190769-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 12, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/190769-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们通过使用内部创新的实验装置来评估聚合物、表面活性剂和碱性驱在多孔介质中的性能。这是为了达到最佳的实验评价,以避免文献中报道的重复实验失败。所提出的工作流程有助于我们理解记录的数据,具有较高的可靠性和准确性。此外,为了模拟储层条件,可以在高温和高盐度下工作。本文进行的评估包括四个主要步骤:1)流体制备和优化,首先进行广泛的流变学评估,以确定流体的最佳浓度/组成。2)压力传感器和泵的校准,并详细确定系统的死容积。3)常规岩心分析,包括测量孔隙度、渗透率和孔隙体积。4)自发渗吸实验、二次、三次模式cEOR驱油实验。岩心驱油实验以0.15ml/min的恒定流速(相当于现场条件1ft/天)进行,然后在达到Sor后进行突起率。实验证明,所构建的实验装置具有良好的再现性和准确性,有利于减少实验失败。1/16″的小直径油管最大限度地减少了死体积,岩心面压差测量在任何注入速率下都具有高精度。在高温条件下(50℃),二级模式下的聚合物驱比三级模式下的采收率高2%。在环境温度下也观察到类似的差异。在高温条件下,HPAM聚合物比生物聚合物具有更高的回收率。然而,在较低的温度下,HPAM的回收率较低。在表面活性剂驱油实验中,二级模式的驱油性能明显优于三级模式,并且面临着从次优表面活性剂溶液中产生大量乳液的问题。通过对这些采收率差异的深入研究,我们发现了两个关键因素:初始油饱和度和流度比。此外,CT扫描成像可以评估油饱和期间的毛细血管末端效应。干燥和饱和岩心图像进行了详细的比较,以确保没有毛细管末端效应存在。最后,开发的数学模拟模型允许对工作进行质量检查,并为进一步评估创建基准。本文提出的工作流程有助于填补文献中经常讨论的关于岩心塞规模的驱油实验失败的空白。因此,它可以帮助研究人员优化他们的工作流程,提高最终结果,以帮助流体评估和评估最佳cEOR过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Laboratory cEOR Flooding Evaluations to Assess Initial Oil Saturation and Mobility Ratio
We evaluate the polymer, surfactant and alkaline flooding performance in porous media by using an in-house innovative experimental setup. This, to reach an optimum experimental evaluation in an attempt to avoid repeated experimental failures reported in the literature. The workflow presented help us to understand the recorded data with high reliability and accuracy. Moreover, allow working at high temperatures and high salinities in order to mimic reservoir conditions. The evaluation undertaken in this paper comprises four main steps: 1) Fluids preparation and optimization, beginning with an extensive rheological evaluation to define the optimum concentration/composition of the fluids. 2) Calibration of pressure sensors and pumps, and detailed determination of the system's dead volume. 3) Routine core analysis was performed, which included measuring porosity, permeability and pore volume. 4) Spontaneous imbibition experiments, secondary and tertiary mode cEOR flooding experiments. The core flooding experiments were performed at a constant flow rate of 0.15ml/min (equivalent to the field conditions of 1ft/day), then followed by a bump rate after Sor is reached. The constructed setup proved to be beneficial on reducing the experimental failures by showing data reproducibility and precision. Small diameter tubings of 1/16″ minimized the dead volumes and core face differential pressure measurement allowed high accuracy at any injection rate. At elevated temperatures (50°C) polymer flooding in secondary mode showed 2% higher recovery compared to tertiary mode. Similar difference was observed at the ambient temperature. For the conditions evaluated in this work, HPAM polymer showed higher recoveries than those of Bio-polymer at higher temperatures. However, lower recoveries from HPAM were observed at lower temperatures. In terms of surfactant flooding experiments the observed performance is significantly better in secondary compared to tertiary mode, as well as facing significant production of emulsion from suboptimal surfactant solutions. Thoroughly examining these differences in recoveries, two key factors were considered to be of critical interest: initial oil saturation and mobility ratio. Moreover, CT scan imaging allowed assessing capillary end effects during oil saturation. A detailed comparison between dry and saturated core images was performed to insure no capillary end effects existed. Finally, a developed mathematical simulation model permitted to quality check the work and create a benchmark for further evaluations. The workflow presented in this paper helps to close the gaps often discussed in the literature with regards to flooding experimental failures at core plug scale. Thus, it can help fellow researchers to optimize their workflow and enhance the final results to aid in fluid evaluation and assessing the optimum cEOR process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信