Hendrik Foedisch, H. Abdullah, R. Hincapie, L. Ganzer
{"title":"优化实验室cEOR驱油评价,以评估初始油饱和度和流度比","authors":"Hendrik Foedisch, H. Abdullah, R. Hincapie, L. Ganzer","doi":"10.2118/190769-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We evaluate the polymer, surfactant and alkaline flooding performance in porous media by using an in-house innovative experimental setup. This, to reach an optimum experimental evaluation in an attempt to avoid repeated experimental failures reported in the literature. The workflow presented help us to understand the recorded data with high reliability and accuracy. Moreover, allow working at high temperatures and high salinities in order to mimic reservoir conditions.\n The evaluation undertaken in this paper comprises four main steps: 1) Fluids preparation and optimization, beginning with an extensive rheological evaluation to define the optimum concentration/composition of the fluids. 2) Calibration of pressure sensors and pumps, and detailed determination of the system's dead volume. 3) Routine core analysis was performed, which included measuring porosity, permeability and pore volume. 4) Spontaneous imbibition experiments, secondary and tertiary mode cEOR flooding experiments. The core flooding experiments were performed at a constant flow rate of 0.15ml/min (equivalent to the field conditions of 1ft/day), then followed by a bump rate after Sor is reached.\n The constructed setup proved to be beneficial on reducing the experimental failures by showing data reproducibility and precision. Small diameter tubings of 1/16″ minimized the dead volumes and core face differential pressure measurement allowed high accuracy at any injection rate. At elevated temperatures (50°C) polymer flooding in secondary mode showed 2% higher recovery compared to tertiary mode. Similar difference was observed at the ambient temperature. For the conditions evaluated in this work, HPAM polymer showed higher recoveries than those of Bio-polymer at higher temperatures. However, lower recoveries from HPAM were observed at lower temperatures. In terms of surfactant flooding experiments the observed performance is significantly better in secondary compared to tertiary mode, as well as facing significant production of emulsion from suboptimal surfactant solutions. Thoroughly examining these differences in recoveries, two key factors were considered to be of critical interest: initial oil saturation and mobility ratio. Moreover, CT scan imaging allowed assessing capillary end effects during oil saturation. A detailed comparison between dry and saturated core images was performed to insure no capillary end effects existed. Finally, a developed mathematical simulation model permitted to quality check the work and create a benchmark for further evaluations.\n The workflow presented in this paper helps to close the gaps often discussed in the literature with regards to flooding experimental failures at core plug scale. Thus, it can help fellow researchers to optimize their workflow and enhance the final results to aid in fluid evaluation and assessing the optimum cEOR process.","PeriodicalId":339784,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 12, 2018","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Laboratory cEOR Flooding Evaluations to Assess Initial Oil Saturation and Mobility Ratio\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Foedisch, H. Abdullah, R. Hincapie, L. Ganzer\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/190769-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We evaluate the polymer, surfactant and alkaline flooding performance in porous media by using an in-house innovative experimental setup. This, to reach an optimum experimental evaluation in an attempt to avoid repeated experimental failures reported in the literature. The workflow presented help us to understand the recorded data with high reliability and accuracy. Moreover, allow working at high temperatures and high salinities in order to mimic reservoir conditions.\\n The evaluation undertaken in this paper comprises four main steps: 1) Fluids preparation and optimization, beginning with an extensive rheological evaluation to define the optimum concentration/composition of the fluids. 2) Calibration of pressure sensors and pumps, and detailed determination of the system's dead volume. 3) Routine core analysis was performed, which included measuring porosity, permeability and pore volume. 4) Spontaneous imbibition experiments, secondary and tertiary mode cEOR flooding experiments. The core flooding experiments were performed at a constant flow rate of 0.15ml/min (equivalent to the field conditions of 1ft/day), then followed by a bump rate after Sor is reached.\\n The constructed setup proved to be beneficial on reducing the experimental failures by showing data reproducibility and precision. Small diameter tubings of 1/16″ minimized the dead volumes and core face differential pressure measurement allowed high accuracy at any injection rate. At elevated temperatures (50°C) polymer flooding in secondary mode showed 2% higher recovery compared to tertiary mode. Similar difference was observed at the ambient temperature. For the conditions evaluated in this work, HPAM polymer showed higher recoveries than those of Bio-polymer at higher temperatures. However, lower recoveries from HPAM were observed at lower temperatures. In terms of surfactant flooding experiments the observed performance is significantly better in secondary compared to tertiary mode, as well as facing significant production of emulsion from suboptimal surfactant solutions. Thoroughly examining these differences in recoveries, two key factors were considered to be of critical interest: initial oil saturation and mobility ratio. Moreover, CT scan imaging allowed assessing capillary end effects during oil saturation. A detailed comparison between dry and saturated core images was performed to insure no capillary end effects existed. Finally, a developed mathematical simulation model permitted to quality check the work and create a benchmark for further evaluations.\\n The workflow presented in this paper helps to close the gaps often discussed in the literature with regards to flooding experimental failures at core plug scale. Thus, it can help fellow researchers to optimize their workflow and enhance the final results to aid in fluid evaluation and assessing the optimum cEOR process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, June 12, 2018\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, June 12, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/190769-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 12, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/190769-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing Laboratory cEOR Flooding Evaluations to Assess Initial Oil Saturation and Mobility Ratio
We evaluate the polymer, surfactant and alkaline flooding performance in porous media by using an in-house innovative experimental setup. This, to reach an optimum experimental evaluation in an attempt to avoid repeated experimental failures reported in the literature. The workflow presented help us to understand the recorded data with high reliability and accuracy. Moreover, allow working at high temperatures and high salinities in order to mimic reservoir conditions.
The evaluation undertaken in this paper comprises four main steps: 1) Fluids preparation and optimization, beginning with an extensive rheological evaluation to define the optimum concentration/composition of the fluids. 2) Calibration of pressure sensors and pumps, and detailed determination of the system's dead volume. 3) Routine core analysis was performed, which included measuring porosity, permeability and pore volume. 4) Spontaneous imbibition experiments, secondary and tertiary mode cEOR flooding experiments. The core flooding experiments were performed at a constant flow rate of 0.15ml/min (equivalent to the field conditions of 1ft/day), then followed by a bump rate after Sor is reached.
The constructed setup proved to be beneficial on reducing the experimental failures by showing data reproducibility and precision. Small diameter tubings of 1/16″ minimized the dead volumes and core face differential pressure measurement allowed high accuracy at any injection rate. At elevated temperatures (50°C) polymer flooding in secondary mode showed 2% higher recovery compared to tertiary mode. Similar difference was observed at the ambient temperature. For the conditions evaluated in this work, HPAM polymer showed higher recoveries than those of Bio-polymer at higher temperatures. However, lower recoveries from HPAM were observed at lower temperatures. In terms of surfactant flooding experiments the observed performance is significantly better in secondary compared to tertiary mode, as well as facing significant production of emulsion from suboptimal surfactant solutions. Thoroughly examining these differences in recoveries, two key factors were considered to be of critical interest: initial oil saturation and mobility ratio. Moreover, CT scan imaging allowed assessing capillary end effects during oil saturation. A detailed comparison between dry and saturated core images was performed to insure no capillary end effects existed. Finally, a developed mathematical simulation model permitted to quality check the work and create a benchmark for further evaluations.
The workflow presented in this paper helps to close the gaps often discussed in the literature with regards to flooding experimental failures at core plug scale. Thus, it can help fellow researchers to optimize their workflow and enhance the final results to aid in fluid evaluation and assessing the optimum cEOR process.