学生反思,以改善获得基于标准的评分反馈

H. Diefes‐Dux, Laura M. Cruz Castro
{"title":"学生反思,以改善获得基于标准的评分反馈","authors":"H. Diefes‐Dux, Laura M. Cruz Castro","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8659325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Research-to-Practice Full Paper, two different reflection prompts in the form of unstructured and structured reflections were implemented in an engineering course to guide students towards improved self-regulated learning behaviors, specifically accessing feedback on their assignments. The course setting for this study employed standards-based grading (SBG) which provides rich feedback on students' proficiency with the course learning objectives. Low student access to feedback, delivered through a learning management system (LMS), was seen as a considerable learning opportunity loss. Negative binomial regression models were used to investigate whether semester (2016 or 2017) and refection (presence or absence) had an impact on the (1) number of days students accessed the LMS gradebook or rubrics, (2) the number of times students accessed the gradebook to view grades, or (3) the number of times students accessed rubrics to view feedback. Semester, which relates to implementation changes in the SBG system, significantly increased students’ number of days of access and number of gradebook and rubric accesses. Reflection, particularly structured reflection, significantly improved students’ access to the rubrics. Pairing reflection with a well-developed SBG system has the potential to improve students’ access to feedback.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Reflection to Improve Access to Standards-Based Grading Feedback\",\"authors\":\"H. Diefes‐Dux, Laura M. Cruz Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2018.8659325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this Research-to-Practice Full Paper, two different reflection prompts in the form of unstructured and structured reflections were implemented in an engineering course to guide students towards improved self-regulated learning behaviors, specifically accessing feedback on their assignments. The course setting for this study employed standards-based grading (SBG) which provides rich feedback on students' proficiency with the course learning objectives. Low student access to feedback, delivered through a learning management system (LMS), was seen as a considerable learning opportunity loss. Negative binomial regression models were used to investigate whether semester (2016 or 2017) and refection (presence or absence) had an impact on the (1) number of days students accessed the LMS gradebook or rubrics, (2) the number of times students accessed the gradebook to view grades, or (3) the number of times students accessed rubrics to view feedback. Semester, which relates to implementation changes in the SBG system, significantly increased students’ number of days of access and number of gradebook and rubric accesses. Reflection, particularly structured reflection, significantly improved students’ access to the rubrics. Pairing reflection with a well-developed SBG system has the potential to improve students’ access to feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在这篇从研究到实践的论文全文中,我们在一门工程课程中实施了两种不同的反思提示,即非结构化和结构化反思,以指导学生改进自我调节的学习行为,特别是获取关于作业的反馈。本研究的课程设置采用基于标准的评分(SBG),对学生对课程学习目标的熟练程度提供丰富的反馈。学生通过学习管理系统(LMS)获得的反馈很少,这被认为是相当大的学习机会损失。使用负二项回归模型来调查学期(2016年或2017年)和反思(出席或缺席)是否对(1)学生访问LMS成绩单或评分表的天数,(2)学生访问成绩单查看成绩的次数,或(3)学生访问评分表查看反馈的次数产生影响。学期与SBG系统的实施变化有关,学生的访问天数和访问成绩单和标题的次数显着增加。反思,尤其是结构化的反思,显著提高了学生对教材的理解。将反思与完善的SBG系统相结合,有可能改善学生获得反馈的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student Reflection to Improve Access to Standards-Based Grading Feedback
In this Research-to-Practice Full Paper, two different reflection prompts in the form of unstructured and structured reflections were implemented in an engineering course to guide students towards improved self-regulated learning behaviors, specifically accessing feedback on their assignments. The course setting for this study employed standards-based grading (SBG) which provides rich feedback on students' proficiency with the course learning objectives. Low student access to feedback, delivered through a learning management system (LMS), was seen as a considerable learning opportunity loss. Negative binomial regression models were used to investigate whether semester (2016 or 2017) and refection (presence or absence) had an impact on the (1) number of days students accessed the LMS gradebook or rubrics, (2) the number of times students accessed the gradebook to view grades, or (3) the number of times students accessed rubrics to view feedback. Semester, which relates to implementation changes in the SBG system, significantly increased students’ number of days of access and number of gradebook and rubric accesses. Reflection, particularly structured reflection, significantly improved students’ access to the rubrics. Pairing reflection with a well-developed SBG system has the potential to improve students’ access to feedback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信