《壳中的风:中世纪无意义研究导论》

J. Kirk
{"title":"《壳中的风:中世纪无意义研究导论》","authors":"J. Kirk","doi":"10.1515/9780823294497-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This introductory section establishes that the question of linguistic nonsignification, apparently a modern concern, was already a matter of widespread and fundamental interest in the Middle Ages. Grounded in a close reading of Geoffrey Chaucer’s House of Fame, it gives an overview of nonsignifcation as it appears in the works of Anselm, William IX, Dante, and Marie de France, among many others. In light of these materials, and in that of what they share with the works of the modernist avant-garde, it points toward a properly medieval hermeneutics of obscurity and emphasizes three of the general implications of this book: that the subaltern status of medieval instances of nonsignification should not be overstated; that the English materials here studied emerge in a trans-continental context; and that the study of medieval nonsense consists in an archaeology of the category of the literary.","PeriodicalId":178860,"journal":{"name":"Medieval Nonsense","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Wind in the Shell: Prolegomena to the Study of Medieval Nonsignification\",\"authors\":\"J. Kirk\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9780823294497-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This introductory section establishes that the question of linguistic nonsignification, apparently a modern concern, was already a matter of widespread and fundamental interest in the Middle Ages. Grounded in a close reading of Geoffrey Chaucer’s House of Fame, it gives an overview of nonsignifcation as it appears in the works of Anselm, William IX, Dante, and Marie de France, among many others. In light of these materials, and in that of what they share with the works of the modernist avant-garde, it points toward a properly medieval hermeneutics of obscurity and emphasizes three of the general implications of this book: that the subaltern status of medieval instances of nonsignification should not be overstated; that the English materials here studied emerge in a trans-continental context; and that the study of medieval nonsense consists in an archaeology of the category of the literary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medieval Nonsense\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medieval Nonsense\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823294497-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medieval Nonsense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823294497-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一引言部分确立了语言无意义的问题,显然是一个现代关注的问题,在中世纪已经是一个广泛和根本的问题。在仔细阅读杰弗里·乔叟的《名人之家》的基础上,本书概述了在安瑟伦、威廉九世、但丁和玛丽·德·弗朗斯等人的作品中出现的无意义。根据这些材料,以及它们与现代主义先锋派作品的共同之处,它指出了一种适当的中世纪默默无闻的解释学,并强调了本书的三个一般含义:中世纪无意义实例的次要地位不应被夸大;这里所研究的英语材料是在跨大陆的背景下出现的;对中世纪胡说八道的研究是文学范畴的考古学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Wind in the Shell: Prolegomena to the Study of Medieval Nonsignification
This introductory section establishes that the question of linguistic nonsignification, apparently a modern concern, was already a matter of widespread and fundamental interest in the Middle Ages. Grounded in a close reading of Geoffrey Chaucer’s House of Fame, it gives an overview of nonsignifcation as it appears in the works of Anselm, William IX, Dante, and Marie de France, among many others. In light of these materials, and in that of what they share with the works of the modernist avant-garde, it points toward a properly medieval hermeneutics of obscurity and emphasizes three of the general implications of this book: that the subaltern status of medieval instances of nonsignification should not be overstated; that the English materials here studied emerge in a trans-continental context; and that the study of medieval nonsense consists in an archaeology of the category of the literary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信