“资源基础观”作为一种替代认知理论的理论回顾与尝试

P. Oh
{"title":"“资源基础观”作为一种替代认知理论的理论回顾与尝试","authors":"P. Oh","doi":"10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.6.0971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Received 3 November 2015Received in revised form 25 November 201527 December 2015Accepted 28 December 2015The purpose of this study is twofold: to theoretically review the ‘resources-based view’ (RBV) developed by D. Hammer and his colleagues as an alternative cognitive theory and to illustrate the usefulness of the theory by applying it to interpret a science learning activity in which undergraduate students worked together to construct a model of the seasons. The theoretical review was based on the exploration of relevant literature and dealt mainly with three types of resources: conceptual, epistemological, and practical resources. The trial application revealed that scientific models have been developed through the combi-nation of different pieces of conceptual resources activated from participants, rather than emerging as unitary wholes. However, all the activated resources were not included into a model, and some of the conceptual resources acted as constraints to constructing a scientific model. The implications included that science educators should be attentive and responsive to students’ resources and help them use the resources productively to learn science.","PeriodicalId":107400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theoretical Review and Trial Application of the ‘Resources-Based View’ (RBV) as an Alternative Cognitive Theory\",\"authors\":\"P. Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.6.0971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Received 3 November 2015Received in revised form 25 November 201527 December 2015Accepted 28 December 2015The purpose of this study is twofold: to theoretically review the ‘resources-based view’ (RBV) developed by D. Hammer and his colleagues as an alternative cognitive theory and to illustrate the usefulness of the theory by applying it to interpret a science learning activity in which undergraduate students worked together to construct a model of the seasons. The theoretical review was based on the exploration of relevant literature and dealt mainly with three types of resources: conceptual, epistemological, and practical resources. The trial application revealed that scientific models have been developed through the combi-nation of different pieces of conceptual resources activated from participants, rather than emerging as unitary wholes. However, all the activated resources were not included into a model, and some of the conceptual resources acted as constraints to constructing a scientific model. The implications included that science educators should be attentive and responsive to students’ resources and help them use the resources productively to learn science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.6.0971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.6.0971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究的目的有两个:从理论上回顾D. Hammer及其同事开发的“资源基础观点”(RBV)作为另一种认知理论,并通过将其应用于解释本科生共同构建季节模型的科学学习活动来说明该理论的有用性。理论回顾是在相关文献的基础上进行的,主要涉及三种类型的资源:概念资源、认识论资源和实践资源。试验应用表明,科学模型是通过参与者激活的不同概念资源的组合而发展起来的,而不是作为单一的整体出现的。然而,并非所有的激活资源都包含在一个模型中,一些概念性资源对构建一个科学的模型起着约束作用。这意味着科学教育者应该关注和响应学生的资源,并帮助他们有效地利用资源来学习科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Theoretical Review and Trial Application of the ‘Resources-Based View’ (RBV) as an Alternative Cognitive Theory
Received 3 November 2015Received in revised form 25 November 201527 December 2015Accepted 28 December 2015The purpose of this study is twofold: to theoretically review the ‘resources-based view’ (RBV) developed by D. Hammer and his colleagues as an alternative cognitive theory and to illustrate the usefulness of the theory by applying it to interpret a science learning activity in which undergraduate students worked together to construct a model of the seasons. The theoretical review was based on the exploration of relevant literature and dealt mainly with three types of resources: conceptual, epistemological, and practical resources. The trial application revealed that scientific models have been developed through the combi-nation of different pieces of conceptual resources activated from participants, rather than emerging as unitary wholes. However, all the activated resources were not included into a model, and some of the conceptual resources acted as constraints to constructing a scientific model. The implications included that science educators should be attentive and responsive to students’ resources and help them use the resources productively to learn science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信