{"title":"介孔生物材料-未来医学治疗和生物分析的多功能材料","authors":"L. Canham, H. Santos, G. Palestino","doi":"10.1515/mesbi-2015-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nanoscience and nanotechnology – the ability to not only fabricate precisely at the nanoscale, but also fully characterize and understand behaviour at these dimensions, is now having some profound influences on medicine. Richard Feynman is widely credited with prompting this era with his challenging 1959 lecture “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom”. When we look at how biomaterials have evolved over many centuries (Figure 1), they have moved from convenience (wooden replacement teeth) to resilience (stainless steel hip implants) to temporary forms (biodegradable implants and tissue engineering) that increasingly utilize nanotechnology. The relative number of new solid biomaterials appearing has also gradually declined at the expense of porous or “nanocomposite” ones, as the material approaches to assisting healing have become more and more biomimetic. Indeed, living organisms rely onpores to function to such an extent that our own bodies are highly porous over widely varying length scales. Blood perfusion around the body is based on conduits of hugely different diameters (arteries, arterioles, capillaries, venules and veins). Our bone remodelling relies on osteoclasts adapting its macroand mesoporosity in-vivo and sensing the local stress fields via fluid flow. At the tissue level, our skin relies on macropores for homeostasis. At the individual cell level we rely on membrane proteins that create micropores for moving molecules in and out. So, what pore sizes are needed for biomaterials? Biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering are a clear example where high levels of macroporosity and very large pores (pore diameters normally in excess of 100 microns) are essential for cellular infiltration, but additional mesoporosity can be very beneficial. Indeed, the so-called “hierarchical porosity” of very broad pore size range is increasingly used here. Biomaterials for immunoisolation on the other hand require tightly controlled mesoporosity Figure 1: Biomaterial evolution: more interactive, multifunctional, nanostructured and porous.","PeriodicalId":157396,"journal":{"name":"Open Material Sciences","volume":"27 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mesoporous Biomaterials – multifunctional materials for future medical therapies and bioanalysis\",\"authors\":\"L. Canham, H. Santos, G. Palestino\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/mesbi-2015-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nanoscience and nanotechnology – the ability to not only fabricate precisely at the nanoscale, but also fully characterize and understand behaviour at these dimensions, is now having some profound influences on medicine. Richard Feynman is widely credited with prompting this era with his challenging 1959 lecture “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom”. When we look at how biomaterials have evolved over many centuries (Figure 1), they have moved from convenience (wooden replacement teeth) to resilience (stainless steel hip implants) to temporary forms (biodegradable implants and tissue engineering) that increasingly utilize nanotechnology. The relative number of new solid biomaterials appearing has also gradually declined at the expense of porous or “nanocomposite” ones, as the material approaches to assisting healing have become more and more biomimetic. Indeed, living organisms rely onpores to function to such an extent that our own bodies are highly porous over widely varying length scales. Blood perfusion around the body is based on conduits of hugely different diameters (arteries, arterioles, capillaries, venules and veins). Our bone remodelling relies on osteoclasts adapting its macroand mesoporosity in-vivo and sensing the local stress fields via fluid flow. At the tissue level, our skin relies on macropores for homeostasis. At the individual cell level we rely on membrane proteins that create micropores for moving molecules in and out. So, what pore sizes are needed for biomaterials? Biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering are a clear example where high levels of macroporosity and very large pores (pore diameters normally in excess of 100 microns) are essential for cellular infiltration, but additional mesoporosity can be very beneficial. Indeed, the so-called “hierarchical porosity” of very broad pore size range is increasingly used here. Biomaterials for immunoisolation on the other hand require tightly controlled mesoporosity Figure 1: Biomaterial evolution: more interactive, multifunctional, nanostructured and porous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":157396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Material Sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Material Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/mesbi-2015-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Material Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mesbi-2015-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
纳米科学和纳米技术——不仅能够精确地在纳米尺度上制造,而且能够完全表征和理解这些尺度上的行为——现在正在对医学产生一些深远的影响。人们普遍认为,理查德·费曼(Richard Feynman)在1959年发表的富有挑战性的演讲《底部有很多空间》(There 's Plenty of Room at the Bottom)推动了这个时代的发展。当我们回顾几个世纪以来生物材料是如何进化的(图1),它们已经从便利性(木制替代牙齿)转变为弹性(不锈钢髋关节植入物),再到临时形式(生物可降解植入物和组织工程),越来越多地利用纳米技术。新型固体生物材料出现的相对数量也逐渐减少,而多孔材料或“纳米复合材料”的数量也逐渐减少,因为辅助愈合的材料方法越来越具有仿生性。事实上,生物体在很大程度上依赖毛孔来发挥作用,以至于我们自己的身体在很大程度上都是多孔的。身体周围的血液灌注是基于直径差异巨大的导管(动脉、小动脉、毛细血管、小静脉和静脉)。我们的骨重建依赖于破骨细胞在体内适应其大孔和介孔,并通过流体流动感知局部应力场。在组织层面上,我们的皮肤依靠大毛孔来维持体内平衡。在单个细胞水平上,我们依靠膜蛋白创造微孔来使分子进出。那么,生物材料需要多大的孔径呢?用于组织工程的生物材料支架是一个明显的例子,其中高水平的大孔隙和非常大的孔隙(孔径通常超过100微米)对于细胞浸润是必不可少的,但额外的介孔可能是非常有益的。实际上,孔径范围非常宽的所谓“分层孔隙度”在这里得到了越来越多的应用。另一方面,用于免疫隔离的生物材料需要严格控制介孔。图1:生物材料的进化:更具交互性、多功能、纳米结构和多孔性。
Mesoporous Biomaterials – multifunctional materials for future medical therapies and bioanalysis
Nanoscience and nanotechnology – the ability to not only fabricate precisely at the nanoscale, but also fully characterize and understand behaviour at these dimensions, is now having some profound influences on medicine. Richard Feynman is widely credited with prompting this era with his challenging 1959 lecture “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom”. When we look at how biomaterials have evolved over many centuries (Figure 1), they have moved from convenience (wooden replacement teeth) to resilience (stainless steel hip implants) to temporary forms (biodegradable implants and tissue engineering) that increasingly utilize nanotechnology. The relative number of new solid biomaterials appearing has also gradually declined at the expense of porous or “nanocomposite” ones, as the material approaches to assisting healing have become more and more biomimetic. Indeed, living organisms rely onpores to function to such an extent that our own bodies are highly porous over widely varying length scales. Blood perfusion around the body is based on conduits of hugely different diameters (arteries, arterioles, capillaries, venules and veins). Our bone remodelling relies on osteoclasts adapting its macroand mesoporosity in-vivo and sensing the local stress fields via fluid flow. At the tissue level, our skin relies on macropores for homeostasis. At the individual cell level we rely on membrane proteins that create micropores for moving molecules in and out. So, what pore sizes are needed for biomaterials? Biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering are a clear example where high levels of macroporosity and very large pores (pore diameters normally in excess of 100 microns) are essential for cellular infiltration, but additional mesoporosity can be very beneficial. Indeed, the so-called “hierarchical porosity” of very broad pore size range is increasingly used here. Biomaterials for immunoisolation on the other hand require tightly controlled mesoporosity Figure 1: Biomaterial evolution: more interactive, multifunctional, nanostructured and porous.