为什么领取福利的人很难重返工作岗位?通过协作在线社区的案例研究

S. Nepal, Cécile Paris
{"title":"为什么领取福利的人很难重返工作岗位?通过协作在线社区的案例研究","authors":"S. Nepal, Cécile Paris","doi":"10.1109/CIC.2016.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media has been used by government agencies for a wide range of applications including listening to citizens' voices at difficult times, understanding their needs, and helping them to deal with their current circumstances. We have developed a collaborative online community, called NextStep, for the Australian federal government agency, the Department of Human Services, to help parents currently receiving a welfare payment transition into full-time work to become self-sufficient. The community enabled its members to share their experiences and relevant information, and support each other during the transition process. During the one-year trial of the community, we found that participants expressed in the discussion forum the reasons why they were having difficulties (re-) entering the workforce fulltime. We thus decided to analyse the content of the forum with the explicit aim of identifying the barriers to work presented, as it provides some valuable insights into this specific user group and their challenges. In this paper, we describe this analysis. The results indicate that the findings of our analysis are consistent with findings from traditional approaches to uncover barriers to work. Interestingly, the information results from the participants discussing freely and sharing experiences, sometimes spontaneously, sometimes in response to a comment or a question provided by a facilitator. It represents the participants' experiences and perceptions and was captured in their own words. We hypothesise that online communities like NextStep could be used to collect data related to \"barriers to work\" complementing traditional approaches such as interviews and surveys.","PeriodicalId":438546,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Is It Difficult for Welfare Recipients to Return to Work? A Case Study through a Collaborative Online Community\",\"authors\":\"S. Nepal, Cécile Paris\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIC.2016.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social media has been used by government agencies for a wide range of applications including listening to citizens' voices at difficult times, understanding their needs, and helping them to deal with their current circumstances. We have developed a collaborative online community, called NextStep, for the Australian federal government agency, the Department of Human Services, to help parents currently receiving a welfare payment transition into full-time work to become self-sufficient. The community enabled its members to share their experiences and relevant information, and support each other during the transition process. During the one-year trial of the community, we found that participants expressed in the discussion forum the reasons why they were having difficulties (re-) entering the workforce fulltime. We thus decided to analyse the content of the forum with the explicit aim of identifying the barriers to work presented, as it provides some valuable insights into this specific user group and their challenges. In this paper, we describe this analysis. The results indicate that the findings of our analysis are consistent with findings from traditional approaches to uncover barriers to work. Interestingly, the information results from the participants discussing freely and sharing experiences, sometimes spontaneously, sometimes in response to a comment or a question provided by a facilitator. It represents the participants' experiences and perceptions and was captured in their own words. We hypothesise that online communities like NextStep could be used to collect data related to \\\"barriers to work\\\" complementing traditional approaches such as interviews and surveys.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2016.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2016.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会媒体已被政府机构广泛应用,包括在困难时期倾听公民的声音,了解他们的需求,并帮助他们处理当前的情况。我们为澳大利亚联邦政府机构人类服务部开发了一个名为NextStep的协作在线社区,帮助目前领取福利金的父母过渡到全职工作,实现自给自足。社区使其成员能够分享他们的经验和相关信息,并在过渡过程中相互支持。在为期一年的社区试用中,我们发现参与者在论坛上表达了他们(重新)全职工作困难的原因。因此,我们决定分析论坛的内容,其明确目标是确定所提出的工作障碍,因为它为这一特定用户群体及其挑战提供了一些有价值的见解。在本文中,我们描述了这一分析。结果表明,我们的分析结果与发现工作障碍的传统方法的结果是一致的。有趣的是,这些信息是参与者自由讨论和分享经验的结果,有时是自发的,有时是对主持人提供的评论或问题的回应。它代表了参与者的经历和看法,并用他们自己的语言记录下来。我们假设,像NextStep这样的在线社区可以用来收集与“工作障碍”相关的数据,作为采访和调查等传统方法的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Is It Difficult for Welfare Recipients to Return to Work? A Case Study through a Collaborative Online Community
Social media has been used by government agencies for a wide range of applications including listening to citizens' voices at difficult times, understanding their needs, and helping them to deal with their current circumstances. We have developed a collaborative online community, called NextStep, for the Australian federal government agency, the Department of Human Services, to help parents currently receiving a welfare payment transition into full-time work to become self-sufficient. The community enabled its members to share their experiences and relevant information, and support each other during the transition process. During the one-year trial of the community, we found that participants expressed in the discussion forum the reasons why they were having difficulties (re-) entering the workforce fulltime. We thus decided to analyse the content of the forum with the explicit aim of identifying the barriers to work presented, as it provides some valuable insights into this specific user group and their challenges. In this paper, we describe this analysis. The results indicate that the findings of our analysis are consistent with findings from traditional approaches to uncover barriers to work. Interestingly, the information results from the participants discussing freely and sharing experiences, sometimes spontaneously, sometimes in response to a comment or a question provided by a facilitator. It represents the participants' experiences and perceptions and was captured in their own words. We hypothesise that online communities like NextStep could be used to collect data related to "barriers to work" complementing traditional approaches such as interviews and surveys.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信