刚性航天器姿态控制的H∞与GIPC控制方法比较

Sayed Kazem Mousaviyanfard Dehkordi, A. Kashaninia, M. Nasirian
{"title":"刚性航天器姿态控制的H∞与GIPC控制方法比较","authors":"Sayed Kazem Mousaviyanfard Dehkordi, A. Kashaninia, M. Nasirian","doi":"10.1109/ICCIAUTOM.2013.6912816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, two methods of H∞ robust control and generalized incremental predictive control (GIPC) are designed and compared for three axis attitude control of a rigid spacecraft. These designs are performed with consideration of environmental disturbances, limitations of available torques and moments of inertia uncertainties. Three reaction wheels are used to produce required torques. Benefits of using generalized incremental predictive control (GIPC) comparing to H∞ robust control is shown by simulation. These advantages are such as considering input constraints, improving some dynamic performance features, and obtaining more applicable controller.","PeriodicalId":444883,"journal":{"name":"The 3rd International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, and Automation","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of H∞ and GIPC control methods for attitude control of rigid spacecrafts\",\"authors\":\"Sayed Kazem Mousaviyanfard Dehkordi, A. Kashaninia, M. Nasirian\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCIAUTOM.2013.6912816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, two methods of H∞ robust control and generalized incremental predictive control (GIPC) are designed and compared for three axis attitude control of a rigid spacecraft. These designs are performed with consideration of environmental disturbances, limitations of available torques and moments of inertia uncertainties. Three reaction wheels are used to produce required torques. Benefits of using generalized incremental predictive control (GIPC) comparing to H∞ robust control is shown by simulation. These advantages are such as considering input constraints, improving some dynamic performance features, and obtaining more applicable controller.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 3rd International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, and Automation\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 3rd International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, and Automation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIAUTOM.2013.6912816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 3rd International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, and Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIAUTOM.2013.6912816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对刚性航天器的三轴姿态控制问题,设计了H∞鲁棒控制和广义增量预测控制(GIPC)两种方法,并进行了比较。这些设计是在考虑环境干扰、可用扭矩限制和惯性矩不确定性的情况下进行的。三个反作用轮用来产生所需的扭矩。通过仿真验证了广义增量预测控制(GIPC)与H∞鲁棒控制相比的优越性。这些优点是考虑了输入约束,改进了一些动态性能特征,获得了更适用的控制器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of H∞ and GIPC control methods for attitude control of rigid spacecrafts
In this paper, two methods of H∞ robust control and generalized incremental predictive control (GIPC) are designed and compared for three axis attitude control of a rigid spacecraft. These designs are performed with consideration of environmental disturbances, limitations of available torques and moments of inertia uncertainties. Three reaction wheels are used to produce required torques. Benefits of using generalized incremental predictive control (GIPC) comparing to H∞ robust control is shown by simulation. These advantages are such as considering input constraints, improving some dynamic performance features, and obtaining more applicable controller.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信