叙事,范式和变化-相关性的问题

G. Fink, M. Yolles
{"title":"叙事,范式和变化-相关性的问题","authors":"G. Fink, M. Yolles","doi":"10.1504/EJCCM.2012.052596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that dominant paradigms influence the relation between narratives and stories. Changes in stories require that paradigms change. Using cybernetic principles, we map the narrative change process across four modes of being. Mode 1 centres on stories that change incrementally. In Mode 2, dominant paradigms are challenged. A plurality of antenarratives with its accompanying cacophony of pro-, counter- and anti-stories indicate paradigmatic war. Mode 3 embraces crisis-narratives as paradigms bifurcate to either pass to their post-narrative demise, or return to Mode 1 with minor adaptations, or may reach Mode 4 to pass through a transformational process (transformation-narratives) that enables them to grasp new problem solutions. Understanding these processes is of importance because they illustrate that, depending on social forces, different narratives are relevant and influential at different times, and may only survive if they are also flexible enough to embrace new ideas and also find the interest of publishers.","PeriodicalId":108773,"journal":{"name":"European J. of Cross-cultural Competence and Management","volume":"5 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narratives, paradigms and change – the issue of relevance\",\"authors\":\"G. Fink, M. Yolles\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/EJCCM.2012.052596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show that dominant paradigms influence the relation between narratives and stories. Changes in stories require that paradigms change. Using cybernetic principles, we map the narrative change process across four modes of being. Mode 1 centres on stories that change incrementally. In Mode 2, dominant paradigms are challenged. A plurality of antenarratives with its accompanying cacophony of pro-, counter- and anti-stories indicate paradigmatic war. Mode 3 embraces crisis-narratives as paradigms bifurcate to either pass to their post-narrative demise, or return to Mode 1 with minor adaptations, or may reach Mode 4 to pass through a transformational process (transformation-narratives) that enables them to grasp new problem solutions. Understanding these processes is of importance because they illustrate that, depending on social forces, different narratives are relevant and influential at different times, and may only survive if they are also flexible enough to embrace new ideas and also find the interest of publishers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European J. of Cross-cultural Competence and Management\",\"volume\":\"5 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European J. of Cross-cultural Competence and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/EJCCM.2012.052596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European J. of Cross-cultural Competence and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/EJCCM.2012.052596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

我们表明,主导范式影响叙事和故事之间的关系。故事的改变需要范式的改变。利用控制论原理,我们绘制了四种存在模式的叙事变化过程。模式1以增量变化的故事为中心。在模式2中,主导范式受到挑战。支持、反对和反对故事的杂音表明了典型的战争。模式3包含危机叙事,作为范式的分支,要么通过叙事后的消亡,要么通过轻微的调整回到模式1,或者可能达到模式4,通过一个转型过程(转型叙事),使他们能够掌握新的问题解决方案。理解这些过程很重要,因为它们说明,根据社会力量的不同,不同的叙述在不同的时期具有相关性和影响力,只有当它们足够灵活,能够接受新想法并找到出版商的兴趣时,它们才可能存活下来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Narratives, paradigms and change – the issue of relevance
We show that dominant paradigms influence the relation between narratives and stories. Changes in stories require that paradigms change. Using cybernetic principles, we map the narrative change process across four modes of being. Mode 1 centres on stories that change incrementally. In Mode 2, dominant paradigms are challenged. A plurality of antenarratives with its accompanying cacophony of pro-, counter- and anti-stories indicate paradigmatic war. Mode 3 embraces crisis-narratives as paradigms bifurcate to either pass to their post-narrative demise, or return to Mode 1 with minor adaptations, or may reach Mode 4 to pass through a transformational process (transformation-narratives) that enables them to grasp new problem solutions. Understanding these processes is of importance because they illustrate that, depending on social forces, different narratives are relevant and influential at different times, and may only survive if they are also flexible enough to embrace new ideas and also find the interest of publishers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信