利用编码犯罪现场数据对窃贼风险暴露和犯罪前准备水平的多专家评估:正在进行中

Martin Boldt, V. Boeva, Anton Borg
{"title":"利用编码犯罪现场数据对窃贼风险暴露和犯罪前准备水平的多专家评估:正在进行中","authors":"Martin Boldt, V. Boeva, Anton Borg","doi":"10.1109/EISIC.2018.00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law enforcement agencies strive to link crimes perpetrated by the same offenders into crime series in order to improve investigation efficiency. Such crime linkage can be done using both physical traces (e.g., DNA or fingerprints) or “soft evidence” in the form of offenders' modus operandi (MO), i.e. their behaviors during crimes. However, physical traces are only present for a fraction of crimes, unlike behavioral evidence. This work-in-progress paper presents a method for aggregating multiple criminal profilers' ratings of offenders' behavioral characteristics based on feature-rich crime scene descriptions. The method calculates consensus ratings from individual experts' ratings, which then are used as a basis for classification algorithms. The classification algorithms can automatically generalize offenders' behavioral characteristics from cues in the crime scene data. Models trained on the consensus rating are evaluated against models trained on individual profiler's ratings. Thus, whether the consensus model shows improved performance over individual models.","PeriodicalId":110487,"journal":{"name":"2018 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Expert Estimations of Burglars' Risk Exposure and Level of Pre-Crime Preparation Using Coded Crime Scene Data: Work in Progress\",\"authors\":\"Martin Boldt, V. Boeva, Anton Borg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EISIC.2018.00021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Law enforcement agencies strive to link crimes perpetrated by the same offenders into crime series in order to improve investigation efficiency. Such crime linkage can be done using both physical traces (e.g., DNA or fingerprints) or “soft evidence” in the form of offenders' modus operandi (MO), i.e. their behaviors during crimes. However, physical traces are only present for a fraction of crimes, unlike behavioral evidence. This work-in-progress paper presents a method for aggregating multiple criminal profilers' ratings of offenders' behavioral characteristics based on feature-rich crime scene descriptions. The method calculates consensus ratings from individual experts' ratings, which then are used as a basis for classification algorithms. The classification algorithms can automatically generalize offenders' behavioral characteristics from cues in the crime scene data. Models trained on the consensus rating are evaluated against models trained on individual profiler's ratings. Thus, whether the consensus model shows improved performance over individual models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2018.00021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2018.00021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

执法机关努力将同一罪犯所犯的罪行串联起来,以提高侦查效率。这种犯罪联系既可以利用物证(如DNA或指纹),也可以利用“软证据”,即罪犯的作案手法,即他们在犯罪过程中的行为。然而,与行为证据不同,物理痕迹只存在于一小部分犯罪中。这篇正在进行中的论文提出了一种基于特征丰富的犯罪现场描述,聚合多个犯罪侧写师对罪犯行为特征的评级的方法。该方法从个别专家的评级中计算共识评级,然后将其用作分类算法的基础。该分类算法可以根据犯罪现场数据中的线索自动归纳出罪犯的行为特征。在共识评级上训练的模型与在单个分析器评级上训练的模型进行评估。因此,共识模型是否比单个模型表现出更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-Expert Estimations of Burglars' Risk Exposure and Level of Pre-Crime Preparation Using Coded Crime Scene Data: Work in Progress
Law enforcement agencies strive to link crimes perpetrated by the same offenders into crime series in order to improve investigation efficiency. Such crime linkage can be done using both physical traces (e.g., DNA or fingerprints) or “soft evidence” in the form of offenders' modus operandi (MO), i.e. their behaviors during crimes. However, physical traces are only present for a fraction of crimes, unlike behavioral evidence. This work-in-progress paper presents a method for aggregating multiple criminal profilers' ratings of offenders' behavioral characteristics based on feature-rich crime scene descriptions. The method calculates consensus ratings from individual experts' ratings, which then are used as a basis for classification algorithms. The classification algorithms can automatically generalize offenders' behavioral characteristics from cues in the crime scene data. Models trained on the consensus rating are evaluated against models trained on individual profiler's ratings. Thus, whether the consensus model shows improved performance over individual models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信