{"title":"欧洲的排他性、欧洲-大西洋和欧亚一体化与欧洲后苏联空间的紧张关系","authors":"M. Kostic","doi":"10.2298/medjp1904498k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this paper is to determine the relations between the European,\n Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian integration, especially their exclusive character\n and the turmoil in the European post-Soviet space. The paper concludes that\n the exclusive nature of the integration process, which has a value and a\n geopolitical dimension, encourages the USA, EU and Russia conflicts for\n control over this area and leads to the reopening of ethnic and territorial\n disputes (solutions for one represent deepening of crisis for the other\n stakeholders), remilitarization and a new arms race, the increased military\n presence of the USA and Russia in the region and further destabilization of\n the world and European order, especially the relationship between the\n USA-Russia-EU. The roots of these integrations are found at the end of the\n Cold War, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and the survival of Western\n economic and defence organizations that sought and still seek to expand to\n the post-Soviet space in order to create a universal liberal democratic world\n order despite Russian dissent. This work thus sheds light on the\n contradictions of keeping an open-door policy of the European and\n Euro-Atlantic integration, which causes the opposite effect in Russia - a\n sense of closing the door, the new isolation and restraint, creating new\n divisions in Europe. On the other hand, the contradiction that this analysis\n reveals is that Russia, while seeking equal treatment and respect for its\n interests by the West, is in fact expecting respect of its inequality\n compared to other European post-Soviet republics, de facto recognition of its\n right of veto to the post-Soviet republics integration and its special role\n in this region, which practically bolster further fears that these countries\n will be returned to the Russian sphere of influence or even a new Russian\n state. Of the several variables that have remained as a result of the breakup\n of the Soviet Union and affected the foreign policies of the post-Soviet\n states, the question of the type of integration became crucial because of its\n defence, geopolitical, economic and wider social effects.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exclusive nature of the European, Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian integration and tension in the European post-Soviet space\",\"authors\":\"M. Kostic\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/medjp1904498k\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of this paper is to determine the relations between the European,\\n Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian integration, especially their exclusive character\\n and the turmoil in the European post-Soviet space. The paper concludes that\\n the exclusive nature of the integration process, which has a value and a\\n geopolitical dimension, encourages the USA, EU and Russia conflicts for\\n control over this area and leads to the reopening of ethnic and territorial\\n disputes (solutions for one represent deepening of crisis for the other\\n stakeholders), remilitarization and a new arms race, the increased military\\n presence of the USA and Russia in the region and further destabilization of\\n the world and European order, especially the relationship between the\\n USA-Russia-EU. The roots of these integrations are found at the end of the\\n Cold War, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and the survival of Western\\n economic and defence organizations that sought and still seek to expand to\\n the post-Soviet space in order to create a universal liberal democratic world\\n order despite Russian dissent. This work thus sheds light on the\\n contradictions of keeping an open-door policy of the European and\\n Euro-Atlantic integration, which causes the opposite effect in Russia - a\\n sense of closing the door, the new isolation and restraint, creating new\\n divisions in Europe. On the other hand, the contradiction that this analysis\\n reveals is that Russia, while seeking equal treatment and respect for its\\n interests by the West, is in fact expecting respect of its inequality\\n compared to other European post-Soviet republics, de facto recognition of its\\n right of veto to the post-Soviet republics integration and its special role\\n in this region, which practically bolster further fears that these countries\\n will be returned to the Russian sphere of influence or even a new Russian\\n state. Of the several variables that have remained as a result of the breakup\\n of the Soviet Union and affected the foreign policies of the post-Soviet\\n states, the question of the type of integration became crucial because of its\\n defence, geopolitical, economic and wider social effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"volume\":\"189 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp1904498k\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp1904498k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exclusive nature of the European, Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian integration and tension in the European post-Soviet space
The subject of this paper is to determine the relations between the European,
Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian integration, especially their exclusive character
and the turmoil in the European post-Soviet space. The paper concludes that
the exclusive nature of the integration process, which has a value and a
geopolitical dimension, encourages the USA, EU and Russia conflicts for
control over this area and leads to the reopening of ethnic and territorial
disputes (solutions for one represent deepening of crisis for the other
stakeholders), remilitarization and a new arms race, the increased military
presence of the USA and Russia in the region and further destabilization of
the world and European order, especially the relationship between the
USA-Russia-EU. The roots of these integrations are found at the end of the
Cold War, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and the survival of Western
economic and defence organizations that sought and still seek to expand to
the post-Soviet space in order to create a universal liberal democratic world
order despite Russian dissent. This work thus sheds light on the
contradictions of keeping an open-door policy of the European and
Euro-Atlantic integration, which causes the opposite effect in Russia - a
sense of closing the door, the new isolation and restraint, creating new
divisions in Europe. On the other hand, the contradiction that this analysis
reveals is that Russia, while seeking equal treatment and respect for its
interests by the West, is in fact expecting respect of its inequality
compared to other European post-Soviet republics, de facto recognition of its
right of veto to the post-Soviet republics integration and its special role
in this region, which practically bolster further fears that these countries
will be returned to the Russian sphere of influence or even a new Russian
state. Of the several variables that have remained as a result of the breakup
of the Soviet Union and affected the foreign policies of the post-Soviet
states, the question of the type of integration became crucial because of its
defence, geopolitical, economic and wider social effects.