识别建筑债务的方法:系统的映射研究

Yagup Macit, G. Giray, Eray Tüzün
{"title":"识别建筑债务的方法:系统的映射研究","authors":"Yagup Macit, G. Giray, Eray Tüzün","doi":"10.1109/UYMS50627.2020.9247070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical debt in general refers to suboptimal decisions the practitioners make during software development that achieve short-term goals at the expense of long-term quality concerns. Architecture technical debt is a subset of technical debt, when software practitioners make wrong or sub-optimal decisions related to the architecture of the software. Identifying such architecture technical debt plays a crucial role in software quality. In the last decade, there were several methods proposed to identify architecture debts in the literature.In this study, we conduct a systematic literature review of methods that identify architecture technical debt by inspecting 28 primary studies published from 2011 to 2020. Based on the outcomes of our review: (1) design rule space and traceability graphs are the dominant techniques; (2) despite the increase of automated techniques in identifying architecture debt, pure manual methods using expert opinion is still popular; (3) majority of the approaches use code/version history to mine archictural technical debt; (4) the field is getting increasingly more attraction in the last five years.","PeriodicalId":358654,"journal":{"name":"2020 Turkish National Software Engineering Symposium (UYMS)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for Identifying Architectural Debt: A Systematic Mapping Study\",\"authors\":\"Yagup Macit, G. Giray, Eray Tüzün\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UYMS50627.2020.9247070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technical debt in general refers to suboptimal decisions the practitioners make during software development that achieve short-term goals at the expense of long-term quality concerns. Architecture technical debt is a subset of technical debt, when software practitioners make wrong or sub-optimal decisions related to the architecture of the software. Identifying such architecture technical debt plays a crucial role in software quality. In the last decade, there were several methods proposed to identify architecture debts in the literature.In this study, we conduct a systematic literature review of methods that identify architecture technical debt by inspecting 28 primary studies published from 2011 to 2020. Based on the outcomes of our review: (1) design rule space and traceability graphs are the dominant techniques; (2) despite the increase of automated techniques in identifying architecture debt, pure manual methods using expert opinion is still popular; (3) majority of the approaches use code/version history to mine archictural technical debt; (4) the field is getting increasingly more attraction in the last five years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Turkish National Software Engineering Symposium (UYMS)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Turkish National Software Engineering Symposium (UYMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UYMS50627.2020.9247070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Turkish National Software Engineering Symposium (UYMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UYMS50627.2020.9247070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

技术债务通常指的是在软件开发过程中,从业者以牺牲长期质量关注为代价来实现短期目标的次优决策。架构技术债务是技术债务的一个子集,当软件从业者做出与软件架构相关的错误或次优决策时。识别这样的架构技术债务在软件质量中起着至关重要的作用。在过去的十年中,文献中提出了几种方法来识别建筑债务。在本研究中,我们通过检查2011年至2020年发表的28项主要研究,对识别架构技术债务的方法进行了系统的文献回顾。基于我们回顾的结果:(1)设计规则空间和可追溯性图是主导技术;(2)尽管识别架构债务的自动化技术有所增加,但使用专家意见的纯手工方法仍然很流行;(3)大多数方法使用代码/版本历史来挖掘架构技术债务;在过去的五年里,这个领域的吸引力越来越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methods for Identifying Architectural Debt: A Systematic Mapping Study
Technical debt in general refers to suboptimal decisions the practitioners make during software development that achieve short-term goals at the expense of long-term quality concerns. Architecture technical debt is a subset of technical debt, when software practitioners make wrong or sub-optimal decisions related to the architecture of the software. Identifying such architecture technical debt plays a crucial role in software quality. In the last decade, there were several methods proposed to identify architecture debts in the literature.In this study, we conduct a systematic literature review of methods that identify architecture technical debt by inspecting 28 primary studies published from 2011 to 2020. Based on the outcomes of our review: (1) design rule space and traceability graphs are the dominant techniques; (2) despite the increase of automated techniques in identifying architecture debt, pure manual methods using expert opinion is still popular; (3) majority of the approaches use code/version history to mine archictural technical debt; (4) the field is getting increasingly more attraction in the last five years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信