框架在线促销:航运价格通胀和交易价值感知

Patrali Chatterjee
{"title":"框架在线促销:航运价格通胀和交易价值感知","authors":"Patrali Chatterjee","doi":"10.1108/10610421111108030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This research examines differences in perceived shipping charge inflation associated with online promotions presented as reducing base product price, reducing shipping surcharge, or reducing all-inclusive price and its impact on deal values for shipping charge skeptics and non-skeptics.Design/methodology/approach: Drawing from research on multi-component pricing and mental accounting, a laboratory experiment investigates if (a) shipping charge skeptics differ in their perceptions of shipping charge inflation for different presentations of online promotions from non-skeptics, and if (b) they differ in perceived deal value of economically equivalent promotions presented as reduced product price, reduced shipping charge promotion, or reduced all-inclusive price for high and low priced items with small or large shipping fees at retail websites.Findings: Analyzes show that shipping charge skeptics differ from non-skeptics in their perceptions of shipping charge inflation and deal values for different online promotions only when surcharge is large relative to base price. Reduced price promotions are most attractive for high-priced items with low surcharge but least attractive for large surcharge sizes. For large surcharge sizes, shipping charge skeptics prefer reduced all-inclusive price promotions to reduced shipping promotions, while non-skeptics prefer reduced shipping promotions to reduced all-inclusive price promotions.Research limitations/implications: Results suggest that effectiveness of various promotion frames at online stores differs based on base price, surcharge size, and consumer skepticism of shipping charge. Robustness of the results obtained at different levels of discount sizes need investigation.Practical implications: Online retailers that have to charge high shipping fees can use promotions to shift the referent price component used by consumers to calculate savings and mitigate perceptions of shipping or base price inflation. For equivalent dollar savings, retailers can use reduced shipping charge promotions to communicate higher deal values to shipping charge non-skeptic consumers than reduced base price or reduced all-inclusive promotions.Originality/value: This research examines how consumer perceptions of deal value differ, even though objective savings and financial outlay is the same, when promotions are presented as reducing product price versus surcharge.","PeriodicalId":344620,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing Online Promotions: Shipping Price Inflation and Deal Value Perceptions\",\"authors\":\"Patrali Chatterjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/10610421111108030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This research examines differences in perceived shipping charge inflation associated with online promotions presented as reducing base product price, reducing shipping surcharge, or reducing all-inclusive price and its impact on deal values for shipping charge skeptics and non-skeptics.Design/methodology/approach: Drawing from research on multi-component pricing and mental accounting, a laboratory experiment investigates if (a) shipping charge skeptics differ in their perceptions of shipping charge inflation for different presentations of online promotions from non-skeptics, and if (b) they differ in perceived deal value of economically equivalent promotions presented as reduced product price, reduced shipping charge promotion, or reduced all-inclusive price for high and low priced items with small or large shipping fees at retail websites.Findings: Analyzes show that shipping charge skeptics differ from non-skeptics in their perceptions of shipping charge inflation and deal values for different online promotions only when surcharge is large relative to base price. Reduced price promotions are most attractive for high-priced items with low surcharge but least attractive for large surcharge sizes. For large surcharge sizes, shipping charge skeptics prefer reduced all-inclusive price promotions to reduced shipping promotions, while non-skeptics prefer reduced shipping promotions to reduced all-inclusive price promotions.Research limitations/implications: Results suggest that effectiveness of various promotion frames at online stores differs based on base price, surcharge size, and consumer skepticism of shipping charge. Robustness of the results obtained at different levels of discount sizes need investigation.Practical implications: Online retailers that have to charge high shipping fees can use promotions to shift the referent price component used by consumers to calculate savings and mitigate perceptions of shipping or base price inflation. For equivalent dollar savings, retailers can use reduced shipping charge promotions to communicate higher deal values to shipping charge non-skeptic consumers than reduced base price or reduced all-inclusive promotions.Originality/value: This research examines how consumer perceptions of deal value differ, even though objective savings and financial outlay is the same, when promotions are presented as reducing product price versus surcharge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421111108030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421111108030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

目的:本研究考察了与降低基本产品价格、降低运输附加费或降低全包价格等在线促销相关的运费通胀感知差异及其对运费怀疑论者和非怀疑论者交易价值的影响。设计/方法/方法:根据对多成分定价和心理会计的研究,一项实验室实验调查了(a)运费怀疑论者对不同在线促销方式的运费膨胀的看法与非怀疑论者不同,以及(b)他们对经济上等效的促销方式的感知交易价值不同,如降低产品价格,降低运费促销,或降低所有包括价格高,价格低的项目与小或大的运费在零售网站。研究结果:分析表明,只有当附加费相对于基本价格较大时,运费怀疑论者与非怀疑论者对不同在线促销的运费通胀和交易价值的看法才有所不同。降价促销对价格高、附加费低的商品最有吸引力,但对附加费大的商品最没有吸引力。对于较大的附加费,运费怀疑论者更喜欢降低全包价格促销而不是降低运费促销,而非怀疑论者更喜欢降低运费促销而不是降低全包价格促销。研究局限性/启示:结果表明,各种促销框架在网上商店的有效性根据基本价格、附加费大小和消费者对运费的怀疑而有所不同。在不同的折扣大小水平上得到的结果的稳健性需要研究。实际意义:必须收取高额运费的在线零售商可以使用促销活动来改变消费者用来计算节省的参考价格成分,并减轻对运费或基本价格通胀的看法。为了节省同等的费用,零售商可以使用降低运费的促销方式,向不怀疑运费的消费者传达更高的交易价值,而不是降低基本价格或降低全包促销。原创性/价值:这项研究考察了消费者对交易价值的看法是如何不同的,即使客观储蓄和财务支出是一样的,当促销活动以降低产品价格和附加费的形式出现时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framing Online Promotions: Shipping Price Inflation and Deal Value Perceptions
Purpose: This research examines differences in perceived shipping charge inflation associated with online promotions presented as reducing base product price, reducing shipping surcharge, or reducing all-inclusive price and its impact on deal values for shipping charge skeptics and non-skeptics.Design/methodology/approach: Drawing from research on multi-component pricing and mental accounting, a laboratory experiment investigates if (a) shipping charge skeptics differ in their perceptions of shipping charge inflation for different presentations of online promotions from non-skeptics, and if (b) they differ in perceived deal value of economically equivalent promotions presented as reduced product price, reduced shipping charge promotion, or reduced all-inclusive price for high and low priced items with small or large shipping fees at retail websites.Findings: Analyzes show that shipping charge skeptics differ from non-skeptics in their perceptions of shipping charge inflation and deal values for different online promotions only when surcharge is large relative to base price. Reduced price promotions are most attractive for high-priced items with low surcharge but least attractive for large surcharge sizes. For large surcharge sizes, shipping charge skeptics prefer reduced all-inclusive price promotions to reduced shipping promotions, while non-skeptics prefer reduced shipping promotions to reduced all-inclusive price promotions.Research limitations/implications: Results suggest that effectiveness of various promotion frames at online stores differs based on base price, surcharge size, and consumer skepticism of shipping charge. Robustness of the results obtained at different levels of discount sizes need investigation.Practical implications: Online retailers that have to charge high shipping fees can use promotions to shift the referent price component used by consumers to calculate savings and mitigate perceptions of shipping or base price inflation. For equivalent dollar savings, retailers can use reduced shipping charge promotions to communicate higher deal values to shipping charge non-skeptic consumers than reduced base price or reduced all-inclusive promotions.Originality/value: This research examines how consumer perceptions of deal value differ, even though objective savings and financial outlay is the same, when promotions are presented as reducing product price versus surcharge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信