{"title":"降压变换器功率级的峰值与改进单周期电流模式控制的比较","authors":"Eduard Vladu, N. Braic, M. Neag, O. Pop","doi":"10.1109/CAS52836.2021.9604139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison between the Peak Current Mode Control and an improved implementation of the One-Cycle Control is presented in this paper. The whole design was implemented using behavioral models. A common power stage was developed to compare the performances of the two control modes, while the controllers were designed for the same crossover frequency using a second order compensator. The performances were assessed by performing frequency and transient simulations in both continuous (CCM) and discontinuous (DCM) conduction modes.","PeriodicalId":281480,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Semiconductor Conference (CAS)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between peak and an improved one-cycle current mode control of a buck converter power stage\",\"authors\":\"Eduard Vladu, N. Braic, M. Neag, O. Pop\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CAS52836.2021.9604139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparison between the Peak Current Mode Control and an improved implementation of the One-Cycle Control is presented in this paper. The whole design was implemented using behavioral models. A common power stage was developed to compare the performances of the two control modes, while the controllers were designed for the same crossover frequency using a second order compensator. The performances were assessed by performing frequency and transient simulations in both continuous (CCM) and discontinuous (DCM) conduction modes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Semiconductor Conference (CAS)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Semiconductor Conference (CAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAS52836.2021.9604139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Semiconductor Conference (CAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAS52836.2021.9604139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between peak and an improved one-cycle current mode control of a buck converter power stage
A comparison between the Peak Current Mode Control and an improved implementation of the One-Cycle Control is presented in this paper. The whole design was implemented using behavioral models. A common power stage was developed to compare the performances of the two control modes, while the controllers were designed for the same crossover frequency using a second order compensator. The performances were assessed by performing frequency and transient simulations in both continuous (CCM) and discontinuous (DCM) conduction modes.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
