基于技术的指导:评估模型在美国企业大学的持续不适用性

Jose Gerardo Martínez Martínez, M. Hernández
{"title":"基于技术的指导:评估模型在美国企业大学的持续不适用性","authors":"Jose Gerardo Martínez Martínez, M. Hernández","doi":"10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V7I1.556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American corporate universities transformed the teaching methodology from a traditional to technology-based instructions, but have failed the application of reliable assessment models. Current trends recognize commitment to education as an essential tool to reach sustained competitive advantages. Assessment information is necessary and valuable to improve the efficiency and productivity of companies, develop competitiveness, and ensure survival in the globalization era. The study examined training assessment models, knowledge level, and the effectiveness of various assessment models practiced by corporate universities found in U.S.A. territories. A descriptive study was conducted through a validated questionnaire by a panel of experts and a pilot study. Available sampling was used consisting of corporate universities, members of an internationally recognized trade and manufacturing organization. Data were collected; analyzed using cumulative frequency-percentage analysis and tabulated using SPSS, version 20.0. Findings showed that 99.7% of the participants recognized the effectiveness of the models and techniques for training assessment, but 82% did not apply any model to assess training results and 99.2% did not have full knowledge of the assessment process. Only 11.3% used indirect techniques for assessment. The researchers concluded that corporate universities in U.S.A. territories sparingly apply any assessment model to evaluate trainings results despite technology-based instructions. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ \n table.MsoNormalTable \n {mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\"; \n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \n mso-style-noshow:yes; \n mso-style-priority:99; \n mso-style-qformat:yes; \n mso-style-parent:\"\"; \n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; \n mso-para-margin:0in; \n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \n mso-pagination:widow-orphan; \n font-size:11.0pt; \n font-family:\"Calibri\",\"sans-serif\"; \n mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; \n mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; \n mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; \n mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; \n mso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\"; \n mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; \n mso-ansi-language:EN-PH;}","PeriodicalId":416137,"journal":{"name":"IAMURE: International Journal of Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology-Based Instructions: Continuous Inapplicability of Assessment Models in American Corporate Universities\",\"authors\":\"Jose Gerardo Martínez Martínez, M. Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V7I1.556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"American corporate universities transformed the teaching methodology from a traditional to technology-based instructions, but have failed the application of reliable assessment models. Current trends recognize commitment to education as an essential tool to reach sustained competitive advantages. Assessment information is necessary and valuable to improve the efficiency and productivity of companies, develop competitiveness, and ensure survival in the globalization era. The study examined training assessment models, knowledge level, and the effectiveness of various assessment models practiced by corporate universities found in U.S.A. territories. A descriptive study was conducted through a validated questionnaire by a panel of experts and a pilot study. Available sampling was used consisting of corporate universities, members of an internationally recognized trade and manufacturing organization. Data were collected; analyzed using cumulative frequency-percentage analysis and tabulated using SPSS, version 20.0. Findings showed that 99.7% of the participants recognized the effectiveness of the models and techniques for training assessment, but 82% did not apply any model to assess training results and 99.2% did not have full knowledge of the assessment process. Only 11.3% used indirect techniques for assessment. The researchers concluded that corporate universities in U.S.A. territories sparingly apply any assessment model to evaluate trainings results despite technology-based instructions. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ \\n table.MsoNormalTable \\n {mso-style-name:\\\"Table Normal\\\"; \\n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \\n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \\n mso-style-noshow:yes; \\n mso-style-priority:99; \\n mso-style-qformat:yes; \\n mso-style-parent:\\\"\\\"; \\n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; \\n mso-para-margin:0in; \\n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \\n mso-pagination:widow-orphan; \\n font-size:11.0pt; \\n font-family:\\\"Calibri\\\",\\\"sans-serif\\\"; \\n mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; \\n mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; \\n mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; \\n mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; \\n mso-bidi-font-family:\\\"Times New Roman\\\"; \\n mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; \\n mso-ansi-language:EN-PH;}\",\"PeriodicalId\":416137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IAMURE: International Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IAMURE: International Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V7I1.556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAMURE: International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V7I1.556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国企业大学将传统的教学方法转变为以技术为基础的教学方法,但未能应用可靠的评估模型。目前的趋势认识到,致力于教育是实现持续竞争优势的基本工具。评估信息对于提高企业的效率和生产力,发展竞争力,确保在全球化时代的生存是必要的和有价值的。该研究考察了美国本土企业大学所采用的培训评估模式、知识水平和各种评估模式的有效性。一项描述性研究是通过一组专家和一项试点研究的有效问卷进行的。可用的抽样由企业大学、国际公认的贸易和制造业组织的成员组成。收集数据;使用累积频率百分比分析法进行分析,并使用SPSS 20.0版本制表。调查结果显示,99.7%的参与者认识到培训评估模型和技术的有效性,但82%的参与者没有应用任何模型来评估培训结果,99.2%的参与者没有充分了解评估过程。只有11.3%的人使用间接技术进行评估。研究人员得出结论,尽管有基于技术的指导,但美国的企业大学很少应用任何评估模型来评估培训结果。正常0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /*样式定义*/表。mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0;mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0;mso-style-noshow:是的;mso-style-priority: 99;mso-style-qformat:是的;mso-style-parent:“”;mso- font - family:宋体;mso-para-margin: 0;mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt;mso-pagination: widow-orphan;字体大小:11.0分;字体类型:“Calibri”、“无衬线”;mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:宋体;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi;mso-ansi-language: EN-PH;}
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology-Based Instructions: Continuous Inapplicability of Assessment Models in American Corporate Universities
American corporate universities transformed the teaching methodology from a traditional to technology-based instructions, but have failed the application of reliable assessment models. Current trends recognize commitment to education as an essential tool to reach sustained competitive advantages. Assessment information is necessary and valuable to improve the efficiency and productivity of companies, develop competitiveness, and ensure survival in the globalization era. The study examined training assessment models, knowledge level, and the effectiveness of various assessment models practiced by corporate universities found in U.S.A. territories. A descriptive study was conducted through a validated questionnaire by a panel of experts and a pilot study. Available sampling was used consisting of corporate universities, members of an internationally recognized trade and manufacturing organization. Data were collected; analyzed using cumulative frequency-percentage analysis and tabulated using SPSS, version 20.0. Findings showed that 99.7% of the participants recognized the effectiveness of the models and techniques for training assessment, but 82% did not apply any model to assess training results and 99.2% did not have full knowledge of the assessment process. Only 11.3% used indirect techniques for assessment. The researchers concluded that corporate universities in U.S.A. territories sparingly apply any assessment model to evaluate trainings results despite technology-based instructions. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:EN-PH;}
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信