偶尔约束流动性约束和宏观经济动态

M. Werner
{"title":"偶尔约束流动性约束和宏观经济动态","authors":"M. Werner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2828686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I conduct a quantitative comparison upon different methodological treatments of a financial constraint. I compute two solutions to a version of the Kiyotaki and Moore (2012) RBC-model. In this framework, aggregate investment as well as the overall trading volume in the equity market must jointly satisfy a liquidity constraint. The tightness of this constraint depends on the aggregate state that particularly includes separate shocks to the resaleability of equity. One of the solutions is computed under the simplifying assumption that the constraint binds permanently, while the other one allows for an occasionally binding constraint. An inappropriate treatment of the constraint is leads to an artificial drop in the equity price. I report that this drop translates into long-run capital accumulation and implies substantial distortions in risky steady states, impulse responses and higher-order moments. Moreover, I find that the long-run comovement between liquidity and the equity price may turn from positive to negative, depending on the technical treatment of the constraint.","PeriodicalId":443911,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Macroeconomics (Topic)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occasionally Binding Liquidity Constraints and Macroeconomic Dynamics\",\"authors\":\"M. Werner\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2828686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I conduct a quantitative comparison upon different methodological treatments of a financial constraint. I compute two solutions to a version of the Kiyotaki and Moore (2012) RBC-model. In this framework, aggregate investment as well as the overall trading volume in the equity market must jointly satisfy a liquidity constraint. The tightness of this constraint depends on the aggregate state that particularly includes separate shocks to the resaleability of equity. One of the solutions is computed under the simplifying assumption that the constraint binds permanently, while the other one allows for an occasionally binding constraint. An inappropriate treatment of the constraint is leads to an artificial drop in the equity price. I report that this drop translates into long-run capital accumulation and implies substantial distortions in risky steady states, impulse responses and higher-order moments. Moreover, I find that the long-run comovement between liquidity and the equity price may turn from positive to negative, depending on the technical treatment of the constraint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Macroeconomics (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Macroeconomics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2828686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Macroeconomics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2828686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我对财务约束的不同方法处理进行了定量比较。我计算了Kiyotaki和Moore(2012)红细胞模型的两个解决方案。在这个框架下,股票市场的总投资和总交易量必须共同满足流动性约束。这种约束的严密性取决于总体状况,特别是包括对股权可转售性的单独冲击。其中一个解决方案是在简化的假设下计算的,即约束永久绑定,而另一个解决方案允许偶尔绑定约束。对约束的不当处理会导致股价人为下跌。我报告说,这种下降转化为长期资本积累,并意味着风险稳定状态、脉冲响应和高阶矩的严重扭曲。此外,我发现流动性和股票价格之间的长期变动可能会从正向负转变,这取决于对约束的技术处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occasionally Binding Liquidity Constraints and Macroeconomic Dynamics
In this paper, I conduct a quantitative comparison upon different methodological treatments of a financial constraint. I compute two solutions to a version of the Kiyotaki and Moore (2012) RBC-model. In this framework, aggregate investment as well as the overall trading volume in the equity market must jointly satisfy a liquidity constraint. The tightness of this constraint depends on the aggregate state that particularly includes separate shocks to the resaleability of equity. One of the solutions is computed under the simplifying assumption that the constraint binds permanently, while the other one allows for an occasionally binding constraint. An inappropriate treatment of the constraint is leads to an artificial drop in the equity price. I report that this drop translates into long-run capital accumulation and implies substantial distortions in risky steady states, impulse responses and higher-order moments. Moreover, I find that the long-run comovement between liquidity and the equity price may turn from positive to negative, depending on the technical treatment of the constraint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信