劳动法个案中的调解与调解

Aneta Krasuń
{"title":"劳动法个案中的调解与调解","authors":"Aneta Krasuń","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.6961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the amicable procedures for resolving individual labor law cases, two basic types can be distinguished, i.e. judicial and extrajudicial. Between these two extreme types, the mixed type can determined i.e. judicial-extrajudicial which is covered by the mediation procedure under Civil Procedure Code Art. 1831-18315. The aim of the article is to show the differences and similarities of conciliation and mediation as two amicable types of solving individual cases in the field of labor law i.e. judicial and judicial-extrajudicial that have the same goal namely concluding a settlement between the parties and thus ending the ongoing dispute","PeriodicalId":158454,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONCILIATION VERSUS MEDIATION IN INDIVIDUAL LABOR LAW CASES\",\"authors\":\"Aneta Krasuń\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0053.6961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the amicable procedures for resolving individual labor law cases, two basic types can be distinguished, i.e. judicial and extrajudicial. Between these two extreme types, the mixed type can determined i.e. judicial-extrajudicial which is covered by the mediation procedure under Civil Procedure Code Art. 1831-18315. The aim of the article is to show the differences and similarities of conciliation and mediation as two amicable types of solving individual cases in the field of labor law i.e. judicial and judicial-extrajudicial that have the same goal namely concluding a settlement between the parties and thus ending the ongoing dispute\",\"PeriodicalId\":158454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.6961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.6961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在解决个人劳动法案件的友好程序中,可以区分出两种基本类型,即司法程序和法外程序。在这两种极端类型之间,可以确定混合类型,即民事诉讼法第1831-18315条规定的调解程序所涵盖的司法-法外调解程序。本文的目的是展示调解和调解作为劳动法领域中两种友好的解决个案的方式的异同,即司法和司法外法,它们都有相同的目标,即在当事人之间达成和解,从而结束正在进行的争议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONCILIATION VERSUS MEDIATION IN INDIVIDUAL LABOR LAW CASES
Among the amicable procedures for resolving individual labor law cases, two basic types can be distinguished, i.e. judicial and extrajudicial. Between these two extreme types, the mixed type can determined i.e. judicial-extrajudicial which is covered by the mediation procedure under Civil Procedure Code Art. 1831-18315. The aim of the article is to show the differences and similarities of conciliation and mediation as two amicable types of solving individual cases in the field of labor law i.e. judicial and judicial-extrajudicial that have the same goal namely concluding a settlement between the parties and thus ending the ongoing dispute
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信