作为虚拟组织产出的研发管理研究文献评价

L. Falkingham, R. Reeves
{"title":"作为虚拟组织产出的研发管理研究文献评价","authors":"L. Falkingham, R. Reeves","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.1996.547805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have created a database of information about papers in a body of research publications on R&D management, and used this to examine the structure of research activity in the field. We found that different types of author tended to produce papers with different types of outcome and also that different authors appeared to subscribe to different schools of thought about the R&D management process. Researchers generally subscribed to different schools of thought from researching practitioners, which raises a question about the utility of this body of research for those who might be thought to be its intended beneficiaries.","PeriodicalId":138196,"journal":{"name":"IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An appraisal of R&D management research literature as the output of a virtual organisation\",\"authors\":\"L. Falkingham, R. Reeves\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMC.1996.547805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have created a database of information about papers in a body of research publications on R&D management, and used this to examine the structure of research activity in the field. We found that different types of author tended to produce papers with different types of outcome and also that different authors appeared to subscribe to different schools of thought about the R&D management process. Researchers generally subscribed to different schools of thought from researching practitioners, which raises a question about the utility of this body of research for those who might be thought to be its intended beneficiaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1996.547805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1996.547805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们创建了一个关于研发管理的研究出版物的信息数据库,并用它来检查该领域的研究活动结构。我们发现,不同类型的作者倾向于发表具有不同类型结果的论文,而且不同的作者似乎认同不同的研发管理过程思想流派。研究人员通常赞同与研究实践者不同的思想流派,这就提出了一个问题,即对于那些可能被认为是其预期受益者的人来说,这一研究体系的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An appraisal of R&D management research literature as the output of a virtual organisation
We have created a database of information about papers in a body of research publications on R&D management, and used this to examine the structure of research activity in the field. We found that different types of author tended to produce papers with different types of outcome and also that different authors appeared to subscribe to different schools of thought about the R&D management process. Researchers generally subscribed to different schools of thought from researching practitioners, which raises a question about the utility of this body of research for those who might be thought to be its intended beneficiaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信