移动机器人Bi-RRT*优化策略比较

R. Yang, Peixu Cai, Luming Wang
{"title":"移动机器人Bi-RRT*优化策略比较","authors":"R. Yang, Peixu Cai, Luming Wang","doi":"10.1109/CSAIEE54046.2021.9543111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aiming at problems such as poor target orientation, redundant path inflection points and collision risk in sampling-based planning algorithm such as RRT and RRT*. Strategies for solving those problems are presented in recent work of papers which based on improving Bi-RRT that is an extension of RRT with faster convergence. This paper provides a comparison and analytical review of those strategies correspond to those problems which the performance of the strategies in terms of path length, processing time and total number of nodes in tree are presented through MATLAB simulation. Moreover, the optimal strategies are selected and implemented in Bi-RRT* which has faster convergence speed as compared to its predecessor of Bi-RRT. Further, certain aspects of improved Bi-RRT* based on selected strategies are found to be improved by comparing to traditional Bi-RRT*.","PeriodicalId":376014,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Electronic Engineering (CSAIEE)","volume":"186 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Strategies for Optimizing Bi-RRT* on Mobile Robots\",\"authors\":\"R. Yang, Peixu Cai, Luming Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSAIEE54046.2021.9543111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aiming at problems such as poor target orientation, redundant path inflection points and collision risk in sampling-based planning algorithm such as RRT and RRT*. Strategies for solving those problems are presented in recent work of papers which based on improving Bi-RRT that is an extension of RRT with faster convergence. This paper provides a comparison and analytical review of those strategies correspond to those problems which the performance of the strategies in terms of path length, processing time and total number of nodes in tree are presented through MATLAB simulation. Moreover, the optimal strategies are selected and implemented in Bi-RRT* which has faster convergence speed as compared to its predecessor of Bi-RRT. Further, certain aspects of improved Bi-RRT* based on selected strategies are found to be improved by comparing to traditional Bi-RRT*.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Electronic Engineering (CSAIEE)\",\"volume\":\"186 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Electronic Engineering (CSAIEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSAIEE54046.2021.9543111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Electronic Engineering (CSAIEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSAIEE54046.2021.9543111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

针对RRT、RRT*等基于采样的规划算法中存在的目标定向差、路径拐点冗余、存在碰撞风险等问题。近年来,国内外学者在改进Bi-RRT的基础上提出了解决这些问题的策略,Bi-RRT是RRT的扩展,收敛速度更快。本文通过MATLAB仿真对这些策略在路径长度、处理时间和树中节点总数方面的性能进行了比较和分析。在Bi-RRT*中选择并实现了最优策略,与Bi-RRT的前身相比,Bi-RRT*具有更快的收敛速度。此外,通过与传统Bi-RRT*进行比较,发现基于所选策略的改进Bi-RRT*的某些方面有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Strategies for Optimizing Bi-RRT* on Mobile Robots
Aiming at problems such as poor target orientation, redundant path inflection points and collision risk in sampling-based planning algorithm such as RRT and RRT*. Strategies for solving those problems are presented in recent work of papers which based on improving Bi-RRT that is an extension of RRT with faster convergence. This paper provides a comparison and analytical review of those strategies correspond to those problems which the performance of the strategies in terms of path length, processing time and total number of nodes in tree are presented through MATLAB simulation. Moreover, the optimal strategies are selected and implemented in Bi-RRT* which has faster convergence speed as compared to its predecessor of Bi-RRT. Further, certain aspects of improved Bi-RRT* based on selected strategies are found to be improved by comparing to traditional Bi-RRT*.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信