专业人士和业余人士

Nathan O’Donnell
{"title":"专业人士和业余人士","authors":"Nathan O’Donnell","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781789621662.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter takes, as its point of departure, the historical detail of the famous 1913 split between Lewis and the Omega Workshops, used here as a lens for considering the professionalisation of the arts in early twentieth-century England. Drawing upon the sociology of the professions in the early twentieth century, the chapter explores the terms ‘professional’ and ‘amateur’ underwent a major shift at this time, with the role of the professional – artist or otherwise – becoming reoriented around notions of expertise, specialisation, and public service. This ‘professional turn’ involved simultaneous adaptation and resistance to increasingly powerful market forces. Lewis’s work in response to Bloomsbury is examined in this light. Blast is explored, in this context, for its proto-professional discourse; while The Caliph’s Designis read as a significant professionalist manifeso, delineating a body of esoteric specialist knowledge as well as a professional mythology for the practising artist. Lewis aggressively defined a (public-spirited, transparent, dogmatic) Vorticism as against the (domestic, private, conciliatory and liberal) amateurism of the Omega Workshops, positioning himself as a ‘pioneer’ professional, of a type that have historically, in different ways, laid the groundwork for the reorganisation of their professional fields.","PeriodicalId":120269,"journal":{"name":"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professionals and Amateurs\",\"authors\":\"Nathan O’Donnell\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/liverpool/9781789621662.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter takes, as its point of departure, the historical detail of the famous 1913 split between Lewis and the Omega Workshops, used here as a lens for considering the professionalisation of the arts in early twentieth-century England. Drawing upon the sociology of the professions in the early twentieth century, the chapter explores the terms ‘professional’ and ‘amateur’ underwent a major shift at this time, with the role of the professional – artist or otherwise – becoming reoriented around notions of expertise, specialisation, and public service. This ‘professional turn’ involved simultaneous adaptation and resistance to increasingly powerful market forces. Lewis’s work in response to Bloomsbury is examined in this light. Blast is explored, in this context, for its proto-professional discourse; while The Caliph’s Designis read as a significant professionalist manifeso, delineating a body of esoteric specialist knowledge as well as a professional mythology for the practising artist. Lewis aggressively defined a (public-spirited, transparent, dogmatic) Vorticism as against the (domestic, private, conciliatory and liberal) amateurism of the Omega Workshops, positioning himself as a ‘pioneer’ professional, of a type that have historically, in different ways, laid the groundwork for the reorganisation of their professional fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789621662.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789621662.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章以1913年刘易斯和欧米茄工作室之间著名的分裂的历史细节为出发点,以此作为考虑20世纪早期英国艺术专业化的镜头。借鉴二十世纪早期的专业社会学,本章探讨了“专业”和“业余”这两个术语在这个时候经历了重大转变,专业人士的角色——艺术家或其他——围绕专业知识、专业化和公共服务的概念重新定位。这种“专业转向”包括同时适应和抵制日益强大的市场力量。刘易斯对布卢姆斯伯里派的回应就是从这个角度来审视的。在这种背景下,Blast探索了其原始专业话语;而哈里发的设计被视为一个重要的专业宣言,描绘了一个深奥的专业知识的身体,以及一个专业神话的实践艺术家。刘易斯积极地定义了一种(公众精神的,透明的,教条的)涡流主义,与欧米茄工作室的(国内的,私人的,和解的和自由的)业余主义相对立,将自己定位为“先锋”专业人士,这种类型的人在历史上以不同的方式为他们的专业领域的重组奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professionals and Amateurs
This chapter takes, as its point of departure, the historical detail of the famous 1913 split between Lewis and the Omega Workshops, used here as a lens for considering the professionalisation of the arts in early twentieth-century England. Drawing upon the sociology of the professions in the early twentieth century, the chapter explores the terms ‘professional’ and ‘amateur’ underwent a major shift at this time, with the role of the professional – artist or otherwise – becoming reoriented around notions of expertise, specialisation, and public service. This ‘professional turn’ involved simultaneous adaptation and resistance to increasingly powerful market forces. Lewis’s work in response to Bloomsbury is examined in this light. Blast is explored, in this context, for its proto-professional discourse; while The Caliph’s Designis read as a significant professionalist manifeso, delineating a body of esoteric specialist knowledge as well as a professional mythology for the practising artist. Lewis aggressively defined a (public-spirited, transparent, dogmatic) Vorticism as against the (domestic, private, conciliatory and liberal) amateurism of the Omega Workshops, positioning himself as a ‘pioneer’ professional, of a type that have historically, in different ways, laid the groundwork for the reorganisation of their professional fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信