可自由支配应计利润协会和四大客户公司:来自印度的证据

A. Mendiratta, Mudit Mendiratta
{"title":"可自由支配应计利润协会和四大客户公司:来自印度的证据","authors":"A. Mendiratta, Mudit Mendiratta","doi":"10.17492/MUDRA.V5I01.13035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines whether discretionary accruals of the company are related with the auditing done by Big 4 auditors of the company. This paper analysed empirically all the listed companies in Bombay Stock Exchange available under the database CMIE- Prowess during the year 2001- 2015. It consists of 8,724 firm- year observations, amongst 950 are Big 4 Client Firms and the rest, 7774 are Non-Big 4 Client Firms. The empirical results reveal that the absolute Discretionary accrual is higher in Non- Big 4 client firms as compared to Big 4 client firms. Further, the Discretionary accrual and Absolute discretionary accrual is found to be significantly associated with Big 4 client firms. Going forward, the significant absolute discretionary accrual in univariate analysis turned insignificant in multivariate analysis when other factors were added. The factors, for instance profitability, cash flow from operations and size are found to be higher in Big 4 client firms as compared to Non- Big 4 firms.","PeriodicalId":254929,"journal":{"name":"MUDRA : Journal of Finance and Accounting","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Discretionary Accruals and Big 4 Client Firms: Evidence from India\",\"authors\":\"A. Mendiratta, Mudit Mendiratta\",\"doi\":\"10.17492/MUDRA.V5I01.13035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines whether discretionary accruals of the company are related with the auditing done by Big 4 auditors of the company. This paper analysed empirically all the listed companies in Bombay Stock Exchange available under the database CMIE- Prowess during the year 2001- 2015. It consists of 8,724 firm- year observations, amongst 950 are Big 4 Client Firms and the rest, 7774 are Non-Big 4 Client Firms. The empirical results reveal that the absolute Discretionary accrual is higher in Non- Big 4 client firms as compared to Big 4 client firms. Further, the Discretionary accrual and Absolute discretionary accrual is found to be significantly associated with Big 4 client firms. Going forward, the significant absolute discretionary accrual in univariate analysis turned insignificant in multivariate analysis when other factors were added. The factors, for instance profitability, cash flow from operations and size are found to be higher in Big 4 client firms as compared to Non- Big 4 firms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUDRA : Journal of Finance and Accounting\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUDRA : Journal of Finance and Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17492/MUDRA.V5I01.13035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUDRA : Journal of Finance and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17492/MUDRA.V5I01.13035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了该公司的可操纵性应计利润是否与四大审计公司所做的审计有关。本文对2001- 2015年孟买证券交易所CMIE-威力数据库下的所有上市公司进行了实证分析。它由8,724家公司的年度观察组成,其中950家是四大客户公司,其余7774家是非四大客户公司。实证结果显示,非四大客户公司的绝对可自由支配应计利润高于四大客户公司。此外,研究发现,可自由支配应计利润和绝对可自由支配应计利润与四大客户公司显著相关。更进一步,当加入其他因素后,单因素分析中显著的绝对可自由支配应计收益在多因素分析中变得不显著。与非四大客户公司相比,四大客户公司的盈利能力、运营现金流和规模等因素都更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Discretionary Accruals and Big 4 Client Firms: Evidence from India
This paper examines whether discretionary accruals of the company are related with the auditing done by Big 4 auditors of the company. This paper analysed empirically all the listed companies in Bombay Stock Exchange available under the database CMIE- Prowess during the year 2001- 2015. It consists of 8,724 firm- year observations, amongst 950 are Big 4 Client Firms and the rest, 7774 are Non-Big 4 Client Firms. The empirical results reveal that the absolute Discretionary accrual is higher in Non- Big 4 client firms as compared to Big 4 client firms. Further, the Discretionary accrual and Absolute discretionary accrual is found to be significantly associated with Big 4 client firms. Going forward, the significant absolute discretionary accrual in univariate analysis turned insignificant in multivariate analysis when other factors were added. The factors, for instance profitability, cash flow from operations and size are found to be higher in Big 4 client firms as compared to Non- Big 4 firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信