从微博看音乐人争议的回归

Mhd Mousa Hamad, M. Skowron, M. Schedl
{"title":"从微博看音乐人争议的回归","authors":"Mhd Mousa Hamad, M. Skowron, M. Schedl","doi":"10.1109/ICTAI.2018.00090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media represents a valuable data source for researchers to analyze how people feel about a variety of topics, from politics to products to entertainment. This paper addresses the detection of controversies involving music artists, based on microblogs. In particular, we develop a new controversy detection dataset consisting of 53,441 tweets related to 95 music artists, and we devise and evaluate a comprehensive set of user-and content-based feature candidates to regress controversy. The evaluation results show a strong performance of the presented approach in the controversy detection task: F1 score of 0.811 in a classification task and RMSE of 0.688 in a regression task, using controversy scores in the range [1, 4]. In addition, the results obtained in applying the presented approach on a dataset from a different domain (CNN news controversy) demonstrate transferability of the developed feature set, with a significant improvement over prior approaches. A combination of the adopted Gradient Boosting based classifier and the developed feature set results in an F1 score of 0.775, which represents an improvement of 9.8% compared to the best prior result on this dataset.","PeriodicalId":254686,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regressing Controversy of Music Artists from Microblogs\",\"authors\":\"Mhd Mousa Hamad, M. Skowron, M. Schedl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTAI.2018.00090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social media represents a valuable data source for researchers to analyze how people feel about a variety of topics, from politics to products to entertainment. This paper addresses the detection of controversies involving music artists, based on microblogs. In particular, we develop a new controversy detection dataset consisting of 53,441 tweets related to 95 music artists, and we devise and evaluate a comprehensive set of user-and content-based feature candidates to regress controversy. The evaluation results show a strong performance of the presented approach in the controversy detection task: F1 score of 0.811 in a classification task and RMSE of 0.688 in a regression task, using controversy scores in the range [1, 4]. In addition, the results obtained in applying the presented approach on a dataset from a different domain (CNN news controversy) demonstrate transferability of the developed feature set, with a significant improvement over prior approaches. A combination of the adopted Gradient Boosting based classifier and the developed feature set results in an F1 score of 0.775, which represents an improvement of 9.8% compared to the best prior result on this dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2018.00090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2018.00090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

社交媒体为研究人员分析人们对各种话题的感受提供了宝贵的数据源,从政治到产品再到娱乐。本文以微博为基础,探讨音乐艺人争议的检测问题。特别是,我们开发了一个新的争议检测数据集,由与95位音乐艺术家相关的53,441条推文组成,我们设计并评估了一套全面的基于用户和内容的候选特征来回归争议。评价结果表明,本文方法在争议检测任务中表现良好:在分类任务中F1得分为0.811,在回归任务中RMSE得分为0.688,争议得分范围为[1,4]。此外,将所提出的方法应用于来自不同领域的数据集(CNN新闻争议)所获得的结果表明,所开发的特征集具有可移植性,与先前的方法相比有显着改善。采用的基于Gradient Boosting的分类器与开发的特征集相结合,F1得分为0.775,与该数据集上的最佳先验结果相比,提高了9.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regressing Controversy of Music Artists from Microblogs
Social media represents a valuable data source for researchers to analyze how people feel about a variety of topics, from politics to products to entertainment. This paper addresses the detection of controversies involving music artists, based on microblogs. In particular, we develop a new controversy detection dataset consisting of 53,441 tweets related to 95 music artists, and we devise and evaluate a comprehensive set of user-and content-based feature candidates to regress controversy. The evaluation results show a strong performance of the presented approach in the controversy detection task: F1 score of 0.811 in a classification task and RMSE of 0.688 in a regression task, using controversy scores in the range [1, 4]. In addition, the results obtained in applying the presented approach on a dataset from a different domain (CNN news controversy) demonstrate transferability of the developed feature set, with a significant improvement over prior approaches. A combination of the adopted Gradient Boosting based classifier and the developed feature set results in an F1 score of 0.775, which represents an improvement of 9.8% compared to the best prior result on this dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信