COVID-19大流行对肺重症期刊作者性别和论文接受率的影响

K. Vranas, H. Gershengorn, D. Ouyang, S. Cheng, A. Rogers, L. Schweiger, C. Cooke, C. Slatore
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对肺重症期刊作者性别和论文接受率的影响","authors":"K. Vranas, H. Gershengorn, D. Ouyang, S. Cheng, A. Rogers, L. Schweiger, C. Cooke, C. Slatore","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly disrupted academic endeavors worldwide, disproportionately influencing female physicians and scientists, and potentially negatively impacting the quantity and quality of research unrelated to COVID-19. We sought to evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a) changes in manuscript submission and acceptance rates among pulmonary/critical care medicine journals, and b) gender-based disparities in these rates. Methods: We used a validated database of author gender to analyze first, senior, and corresponding authorship of all manuscripts submitted to four pulmonary/critical care journals based in the United States (US) between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. We constructed interrupted time series regression models to evaluate whether the proportion of female first and senior authors of non-COVID-19 original research manuscripts changed coincident with the COVID- 19 pandemic. Next, we performed multivariable logistic regressions to evaluate the association of author gender with acceptance of original research manuscript after adjusting for subject category, author world region, and journal. We then conducted sensitivity analyses including all non-original research manuscripts. Results: Among 8,332 original research submissions, women comprised 39.9% and 28.3% of first and senior authors, respectively. We found no change in the proportion of female first or senior authors of non-COVID-19 or COVID-19 submitted research manuscripts during the COVID-19 era. Although female first authorship was not associated with manuscript acceptance, female senior authorship was associated with decreased acceptance of non-COVID research manuscripts (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.99). Non-COVID-19 manuscripts submitted during the COVID-19 era had reduced odds of acceptance, regardless of author gender (first author analysis: aOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.36-0.59];senior author analysis: aOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.37-0.57]). Conclusions: Women comprise a minority of first and senior authors among research manuscripts submitted to US-based pulmonary and critical care journals, but this was not influenced by the pandemic. Female senior authorship of non-COVID-19 research manuscripts was associated with reduced odds of acceptance. However, non-COVID manuscripts were nearly 50% less likely to be accepted during the COVID-19 era, independent of author gender. These results provide important insights into the influence of the pandemic on gender disparities in academic medicine and on the publication of high-quality research focused on topics unrelated to COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":229442,"journal":{"name":"C14. BURNOUT, DISPARITIES, AND OUTCOMES OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Author Gender and Manuscript Acceptance Rates Among Pulmonary and Critical Care Journals\",\"authors\":\"K. Vranas, H. Gershengorn, D. Ouyang, S. Cheng, A. Rogers, L. Schweiger, C. Cooke, C. Slatore\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly disrupted academic endeavors worldwide, disproportionately influencing female physicians and scientists, and potentially negatively impacting the quantity and quality of research unrelated to COVID-19. We sought to evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a) changes in manuscript submission and acceptance rates among pulmonary/critical care medicine journals, and b) gender-based disparities in these rates. Methods: We used a validated database of author gender to analyze first, senior, and corresponding authorship of all manuscripts submitted to four pulmonary/critical care journals based in the United States (US) between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. We constructed interrupted time series regression models to evaluate whether the proportion of female first and senior authors of non-COVID-19 original research manuscripts changed coincident with the COVID- 19 pandemic. Next, we performed multivariable logistic regressions to evaluate the association of author gender with acceptance of original research manuscript after adjusting for subject category, author world region, and journal. We then conducted sensitivity analyses including all non-original research manuscripts. Results: Among 8,332 original research submissions, women comprised 39.9% and 28.3% of first and senior authors, respectively. We found no change in the proportion of female first or senior authors of non-COVID-19 or COVID-19 submitted research manuscripts during the COVID-19 era. Although female first authorship was not associated with manuscript acceptance, female senior authorship was associated with decreased acceptance of non-COVID research manuscripts (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.99). Non-COVID-19 manuscripts submitted during the COVID-19 era had reduced odds of acceptance, regardless of author gender (first author analysis: aOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.36-0.59];senior author analysis: aOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.37-0.57]). Conclusions: Women comprise a minority of first and senior authors among research manuscripts submitted to US-based pulmonary and critical care journals, but this was not influenced by the pandemic. Female senior authorship of non-COVID-19 research manuscripts was associated with reduced odds of acceptance. However, non-COVID manuscripts were nearly 50% less likely to be accepted during the COVID-19 era, independent of author gender. These results provide important insights into the influence of the pandemic on gender disparities in academic medicine and on the publication of high-quality research focused on topics unrelated to COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"C14. BURNOUT, DISPARITIES, AND OUTCOMES OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"C14. BURNOUT, DISPARITIES, AND OUTCOMES OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C14. BURNOUT, DISPARITIES, AND OUTCOMES OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

理由:COVID-19大流行严重扰乱了全球的学术努力,对女性医生和科学家的影响尤其严重,并可能对与COVID-19无关的研究的数量和质量产生负面影响。我们试图评估COVID-19大流行是否与a)肺/重症医学期刊的论文提交率和接受率的变化以及b)这些比率的性别差异有关。方法:我们使用一个经过验证的作者性别数据库,分析2018年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间提交给美国四种肺/重症期刊的所有手稿的第一作者、高级作者和相应作者。我们构建了中断时间序列回归模型,以评估非COVID-19原创研究论文的女性第一作者和高级作者比例是否随COVID-19大流行而发生变化。接下来,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归,在调整了主题类别、作者世界地区和期刊后,评估了作者性别与原创性研究稿件接受度的关系。然后,我们对所有非原创研究手稿进行敏感性分析。结果:8332篇原创论文中,女性占第一作者和高级作者的比例分别为39.9%和28.3%。我们发现,在COVID-19时代,非COVID-19或COVID-19提交的研究论文的女性第一作者或高级作者的比例没有变化。虽然女性第一作者与论文接受度无关,但女性高级作者与非covid研究论文的接受度降低相关(调整优势比[aOR] 0.84, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.71-0.99)。无论作者性别如何,在COVID-19时代提交的非COVID-19稿件均降低了被接受的几率(第一作者分析:aOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.36-0.59];高级作者分析:aOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.37-0.57])。结论:在提交给美国肺部和重症监护期刊的研究手稿中,女性占第一作者和高级作者的少数,但这并未受到大流行的影响。非covid -19研究手稿的女性高级作者与被接受的几率降低相关。然而,在COVID-19时代,与作者性别无关,非COVID-19稿件的被接受率降低了近50%。这些结果为了解大流行对学术医学性别差异的影响以及对与COVID-19无关主题的高质量研究发表的影响提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Author Gender and Manuscript Acceptance Rates Among Pulmonary and Critical Care Journals
Rationale: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly disrupted academic endeavors worldwide, disproportionately influencing female physicians and scientists, and potentially negatively impacting the quantity and quality of research unrelated to COVID-19. We sought to evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a) changes in manuscript submission and acceptance rates among pulmonary/critical care medicine journals, and b) gender-based disparities in these rates. Methods: We used a validated database of author gender to analyze first, senior, and corresponding authorship of all manuscripts submitted to four pulmonary/critical care journals based in the United States (US) between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. We constructed interrupted time series regression models to evaluate whether the proportion of female first and senior authors of non-COVID-19 original research manuscripts changed coincident with the COVID- 19 pandemic. Next, we performed multivariable logistic regressions to evaluate the association of author gender with acceptance of original research manuscript after adjusting for subject category, author world region, and journal. We then conducted sensitivity analyses including all non-original research manuscripts. Results: Among 8,332 original research submissions, women comprised 39.9% and 28.3% of first and senior authors, respectively. We found no change in the proportion of female first or senior authors of non-COVID-19 or COVID-19 submitted research manuscripts during the COVID-19 era. Although female first authorship was not associated with manuscript acceptance, female senior authorship was associated with decreased acceptance of non-COVID research manuscripts (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.99). Non-COVID-19 manuscripts submitted during the COVID-19 era had reduced odds of acceptance, regardless of author gender (first author analysis: aOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.36-0.59];senior author analysis: aOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.37-0.57]). Conclusions: Women comprise a minority of first and senior authors among research manuscripts submitted to US-based pulmonary and critical care journals, but this was not influenced by the pandemic. Female senior authorship of non-COVID-19 research manuscripts was associated with reduced odds of acceptance. However, non-COVID manuscripts were nearly 50% less likely to be accepted during the COVID-19 era, independent of author gender. These results provide important insights into the influence of the pandemic on gender disparities in academic medicine and on the publication of high-quality research focused on topics unrelated to COVID-19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信