高血压患者生活质量评估:新型生活质量评估工具潜力的综合评价

Nsc Nursing Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.32549/opi-nsc-79
La Ode Alifariki, Sri Susanty, H. Siagian, D. Daryono
{"title":"高血压患者生活质量评估:新型生活质量评估工具潜力的综合评价","authors":"La Ode Alifariki, Sri Susanty, H. Siagian, D. Daryono","doi":"10.32549/opi-nsc-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aim: The body of literature on QoL has steadily grown over recent years, spurred by the promotion of research and the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of assessment instruments in different languages. However, limited information exists on the most commonly used instruments against the backdrop of current demographic and epidemiological trends. The aim this study to evaluate QoL assessment instruments used in hypertensive patients. Methods & Materials: This review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Databases used including Sciencedirect, Cochrane library, Pubmed, Proquest, and the Wiley Online Library, utilizing keywords that are tailored to the Mesh Terms. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) value at least 140 mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) value at least 90 mmHg, or the patient had a history of hypertension and was administered with antihypertensive drugs, English version, observational studies that presented Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores in hypertensive individuals using varied assessment tools (WHOQoL BREF, SF-36, MINICHAL, etc) where these tools assess the situation of the patient's quality of life based on the domain of life (physiological, psychological, social interaction, etc.) in the form of numbers, and published between January 2000 to December 2021 were inclusion criteria of the study. Relevant studies were read critically, analyzed, and described in detail. Survey data were processed in the form of comparative tables. Results: A total of 2,287,348 references were found through databases, and for the final screening, twenty-two articles were finally designated as articles to be reviewed. The SF-36 (SF-8, SF-12), WHOQoL BREF, MINICHAL, and PECVEC are assessment tools used in the studies included in this review. The SF-36 was the most widely used tool in the studies included in this review. One of the critical domains to assess is spiritual, where none of the studies included this domain. Conclusion: The SF-36 is the most frequently used assessment tool. However, this form is a general form that is not explicitly intended to assess the quality of life in hypertension only. The spiritual domain is one of the important items that need to be included in the QoL assessment tool.","PeriodicalId":387300,"journal":{"name":"Nsc Nursing","volume":"&NA; 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of quality of life for hypertensive patients: Integrative review for Potential of Novel Assessment Tools of quality of life\",\"authors\":\"La Ode Alifariki, Sri Susanty, H. Siagian, D. Daryono\",\"doi\":\"10.32549/opi-nsc-79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Aim: The body of literature on QoL has steadily grown over recent years, spurred by the promotion of research and the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of assessment instruments in different languages. However, limited information exists on the most commonly used instruments against the backdrop of current demographic and epidemiological trends. The aim this study to evaluate QoL assessment instruments used in hypertensive patients. Methods & Materials: This review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Databases used including Sciencedirect, Cochrane library, Pubmed, Proquest, and the Wiley Online Library, utilizing keywords that are tailored to the Mesh Terms. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) value at least 140 mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) value at least 90 mmHg, or the patient had a history of hypertension and was administered with antihypertensive drugs, English version, observational studies that presented Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores in hypertensive individuals using varied assessment tools (WHOQoL BREF, SF-36, MINICHAL, etc) where these tools assess the situation of the patient's quality of life based on the domain of life (physiological, psychological, social interaction, etc.) in the form of numbers, and published between January 2000 to December 2021 were inclusion criteria of the study. Relevant studies were read critically, analyzed, and described in detail. Survey data were processed in the form of comparative tables. Results: A total of 2,287,348 references were found through databases, and for the final screening, twenty-two articles were finally designated as articles to be reviewed. The SF-36 (SF-8, SF-12), WHOQoL BREF, MINICHAL, and PECVEC are assessment tools used in the studies included in this review. The SF-36 was the most widely used tool in the studies included in this review. One of the critical domains to assess is spiritual, where none of the studies included this domain. Conclusion: The SF-36 is the most frequently used assessment tool. However, this form is a general form that is not explicitly intended to assess the quality of life in hypertension only. The spiritual domain is one of the important items that need to be included in the QoL assessment tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nsc Nursing\",\"volume\":\"&NA; 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nsc Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32549/opi-nsc-79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nsc Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32549/opi-nsc-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:近年来,由于研究的推进和不同语言评估工具的跨文化适应和验证,关于生活质量的文献数量稳步增长。然而,在当前人口和流行病学趋势的背景下,关于最常用工具的信息有限。目的探讨高血压患者生活质量评价工具的应用价值。方法和材料:本综述采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行。使用的数据库包括Sciencedirect、Cochrane图书馆、Pubmed、Proquest和Wiley在线图书馆,使用针对网格术语定制的关键字。收缩压(SBP)值至少140 mmHg和/或舒张压(DBP)值至少90 mmHg,或患者有高血压病史并服用降压药,英文版,观察性研究使用各种评估工具(WHOQoL BREF, SF-36, MINICHAL,等),其中这些工具以数字的形式评估患者生活质量的状况,这些工具基于生活领域(生理、心理、社会互动等),并在2000年1月至2021年12月期间发布,是该研究的纳入标准。对相关研究进行批判性阅读、分析和详细描述。调查数据以对照表的形式处理。结果:通过数据库共检索到2287348篇参考文献,经过最终筛选,最终确定了22篇文章为综述文章。SF-36 (SF-8、SF-12)、WHOQoL BREF、MINICHAL和PECVEC是本综述纳入的研究中使用的评估工具。SF-36是本综述纳入的研究中使用最广泛的工具。评估的关键领域之一是精神领域,没有一项研究包括这一领域。结论:SF-36是最常用的评估工具。然而,这种形式是一种通用形式,并非明确用于评估高血压患者的生活质量。精神领域是QoL评估工具中需要包含的重要项目之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of quality of life for hypertensive patients: Integrative review for Potential of Novel Assessment Tools of quality of life
Background & Aim: The body of literature on QoL has steadily grown over recent years, spurred by the promotion of research and the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of assessment instruments in different languages. However, limited information exists on the most commonly used instruments against the backdrop of current demographic and epidemiological trends. The aim this study to evaluate QoL assessment instruments used in hypertensive patients. Methods & Materials: This review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Databases used including Sciencedirect, Cochrane library, Pubmed, Proquest, and the Wiley Online Library, utilizing keywords that are tailored to the Mesh Terms. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) value at least 140 mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) value at least 90 mmHg, or the patient had a history of hypertension and was administered with antihypertensive drugs, English version, observational studies that presented Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores in hypertensive individuals using varied assessment tools (WHOQoL BREF, SF-36, MINICHAL, etc) where these tools assess the situation of the patient's quality of life based on the domain of life (physiological, psychological, social interaction, etc.) in the form of numbers, and published between January 2000 to December 2021 were inclusion criteria of the study. Relevant studies were read critically, analyzed, and described in detail. Survey data were processed in the form of comparative tables. Results: A total of 2,287,348 references were found through databases, and for the final screening, twenty-two articles were finally designated as articles to be reviewed. The SF-36 (SF-8, SF-12), WHOQoL BREF, MINICHAL, and PECVEC are assessment tools used in the studies included in this review. The SF-36 was the most widely used tool in the studies included in this review. One of the critical domains to assess is spiritual, where none of the studies included this domain. Conclusion: The SF-36 is the most frequently used assessment tool. However, this form is a general form that is not explicitly intended to assess the quality of life in hypertension only. The spiritual domain is one of the important items that need to be included in the QoL assessment tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信