多认知汽车协同避碰运动规划算法比较

C. Frese, J. Beyerer
{"title":"多认知汽车协同避碰运动规划算法比较","authors":"C. Frese, J. Beyerer","doi":"10.1109/IVS.2011.5940489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated cooperative collision avoidance of multiple vehicles is a promising approach to increase road safety in the future. This approach requires a real-time motion planner which computes cooperative maneuvers of multiple cognitive vehicles. As motion planning is a task of high computational complexity, computing times of the planner have to be traded off against solution quality. This contribution compares several cooperative motion planning algorithms with respect to these criteria. The considered algorithms are a tree search algorithm relying on precomputed lower bounds, the elastic band method, mixed-integer linear programming, and a priority-based approach. Success rates and computing times on various simulated scenarios are reported.","PeriodicalId":117811,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"69","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of motion planning algorithms for cooperative collision avoidance of multiple cognitive automobiles\",\"authors\":\"C. Frese, J. Beyerer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IVS.2011.5940489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automated cooperative collision avoidance of multiple vehicles is a promising approach to increase road safety in the future. This approach requires a real-time motion planner which computes cooperative maneuvers of multiple cognitive vehicles. As motion planning is a task of high computational complexity, computing times of the planner have to be traded off against solution quality. This contribution compares several cooperative motion planning algorithms with respect to these criteria. The considered algorithms are a tree search algorithm relying on precomputed lower bounds, the elastic band method, mixed-integer linear programming, and a priority-based approach. Success rates and computing times on various simulated scenarios are reported.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"69\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2011.5940489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2011.5940489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

摘要

多车自动协同避碰是未来提高道路安全的一种很有前途的方法。这种方法需要一个实时运动规划器来计算多个认知车辆的协同机动。由于运动规划是一项计算复杂度很高的任务,规划器的计算时间必须与解的质量相权衡。这篇文章比较了几种基于这些标准的协同运动规划算法。所考虑的算法是依赖于预先计算下界的树搜索算法、弹性带方法、混合整数线性规划和基于优先级的方法。报告了各种模拟场景下的成功率和计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of motion planning algorithms for cooperative collision avoidance of multiple cognitive automobiles
Automated cooperative collision avoidance of multiple vehicles is a promising approach to increase road safety in the future. This approach requires a real-time motion planner which computes cooperative maneuvers of multiple cognitive vehicles. As motion planning is a task of high computational complexity, computing times of the planner have to be traded off against solution quality. This contribution compares several cooperative motion planning algorithms with respect to these criteria. The considered algorithms are a tree search algorithm relying on precomputed lower bounds, the elastic band method, mixed-integer linear programming, and a priority-based approach. Success rates and computing times on various simulated scenarios are reported.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信