预测条件数的两种算法的比较

Guénaël Cabanes, Younès Bennani
{"title":"预测条件数的两种算法的比较","authors":"Guénaël Cabanes, Younès Bennani","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA.2007.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present experimental results of comparing the modified K-nearest neighbor (MkNN) algorithm with support vector machine (SVM) in the prediction of condition numbers of sparse matrices. Condition number of a matrix is an important measure in numerical analysis and linear algebra. However, the direct computation of the condition number of a matrix is very expensive in terms of CPU and memory cost, and becomes prohibitive for large size matrices. We use data mining techniques to estimate the condition number of a given sparse matrix. In our previous work, we used support vector machine (SVM) to predict the condition numbers. While SVM is considered a state-of- the-art classification/regression algorithm, kNN is usually used for collaborative filtering tasks. Since prediction can also be interpreted as a classification/regression task, virtually any supervised learning algorithm (such as kNN) can also be applied. Experiments are performed on a publicly available dataset. We conclude that modified kNN (MkNN) performs much better than SVM on this particular dataset.","PeriodicalId":448863,"journal":{"name":"Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA 2007)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two algorithms for predicting the condition number\",\"authors\":\"Guénaël Cabanes, Younès Bennani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMLA.2007.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present experimental results of comparing the modified K-nearest neighbor (MkNN) algorithm with support vector machine (SVM) in the prediction of condition numbers of sparse matrices. Condition number of a matrix is an important measure in numerical analysis and linear algebra. However, the direct computation of the condition number of a matrix is very expensive in terms of CPU and memory cost, and becomes prohibitive for large size matrices. We use data mining techniques to estimate the condition number of a given sparse matrix. In our previous work, we used support vector machine (SVM) to predict the condition numbers. While SVM is considered a state-of- the-art classification/regression algorithm, kNN is usually used for collaborative filtering tasks. Since prediction can also be interpreted as a classification/regression task, virtually any supervised learning algorithm (such as kNN) can also be applied. Experiments are performed on a publicly available dataset. We conclude that modified kNN (MkNN) performs much better than SVM on this particular dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA 2007)\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2007.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2007.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

本文给出了改进的k近邻(MkNN)算法与支持向量机(SVM)算法在稀疏矩阵条件数预测中的比较实验结果。矩阵的条件数是数值分析和线性代数中的一个重要度量。然而,直接计算矩阵的条件数在CPU和内存成本方面是非常昂贵的,并且对于大尺寸的矩阵来说变得令人望而却步。我们使用数据挖掘技术来估计给定稀疏矩阵的条件数。在我们之前的工作中,我们使用支持向量机(SVM)来预测条件数。虽然SVM被认为是最先进的分类/回归算法,但kNN通常用于协同过滤任务。由于预测也可以解释为分类/回归任务,几乎任何监督学习算法(如kNN)也可以应用。实验是在公开可用的数据集上进行的。我们得出结论,改进的kNN (MkNN)在这个特定的数据集上比支持向量机表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of two algorithms for predicting the condition number
We present experimental results of comparing the modified K-nearest neighbor (MkNN) algorithm with support vector machine (SVM) in the prediction of condition numbers of sparse matrices. Condition number of a matrix is an important measure in numerical analysis and linear algebra. However, the direct computation of the condition number of a matrix is very expensive in terms of CPU and memory cost, and becomes prohibitive for large size matrices. We use data mining techniques to estimate the condition number of a given sparse matrix. In our previous work, we used support vector machine (SVM) to predict the condition numbers. While SVM is considered a state-of- the-art classification/regression algorithm, kNN is usually used for collaborative filtering tasks. Since prediction can also be interpreted as a classification/regression task, virtually any supervised learning algorithm (such as kNN) can also be applied. Experiments are performed on a publicly available dataset. We conclude that modified kNN (MkNN) performs much better than SVM on this particular dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信