{"title":"法国的气候怀疑论者","authors":"Stephanie Posthumus","doi":"10.5040/9781350057050.CH-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"judgement of decision about whether Anaxagoras and Galileo and Lysenko are or right […] The external history has the sciences join or develop into schools or pressure groups, and it demands that their truth be socially canonized. Individuals or associations appear before a given court, and fragile truth is thereby reinforced […]. In the final analysis, there is no general history of science that is not judicially recorded. No science without trials; no truth without judgements, whether internal or external to knowledge. Its history can’t do without tribunals.","PeriodicalId":192798,"journal":{"name":"Climate Change Scepticism","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climato-scepticisme in France\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Posthumus\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781350057050.CH-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"judgement of decision about whether Anaxagoras and Galileo and Lysenko are or right […] The external history has the sciences join or develop into schools or pressure groups, and it demands that their truth be socially canonized. Individuals or associations appear before a given court, and fragile truth is thereby reinforced […]. In the final analysis, there is no general history of science that is not judicially recorded. No science without trials; no truth without judgements, whether internal or external to knowledge. Its history can’t do without tribunals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Change Scepticism\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Change Scepticism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350057050.CH-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Change Scepticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350057050.CH-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
judgement of decision about whether Anaxagoras and Galileo and Lysenko are or right […] The external history has the sciences join or develop into schools or pressure groups, and it demands that their truth be socially canonized. Individuals or associations appear before a given court, and fragile truth is thereby reinforced […]. In the final analysis, there is no general history of science that is not judicially recorded. No science without trials; no truth without judgements, whether internal or external to knowledge. Its history can’t do without tribunals.