在2019冠状病毒病最严重的纽约市,智能手机和平板电脑用于患者和家属之间的视频访问

E. Tay, C. Kuhner, M. Lalane, A. Kopelman
{"title":"在2019冠状病毒病最严重的纽约市,智能手机和平板电脑用于患者和家属之间的视频访问","authors":"E. Tay, C. Kuhner, M. Lalane, A. Kopelman","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: In March of 2020, New York City became an epicenter of COVID-19. Due to the risk of airborne transmission and limited personal protective equipment, hospitals restricted patient visitations to protect both healthcare workers and patients. In response to the initiation of this visitation restriction at our hospital on March 18, 2020, we piloted a video-based communication program for families to virtually “visit” their family members in the hospital. This is a quality improvement project designed to evaluate the utility and limitations of these virtual family visits during the pandemic. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients over 17 years-old hospitalized between March 18 and May 31, 2020 for documented video encounters performed by hospital staff at a New York City public hospital. All video calls were performed using Whatsapp, Facetime, or Google Hangout communication app on a hospital-issued smartphone or tablet. Data collected included date of call, patient age, call facilitator, preferred language, patient location during hospitalization, use of mechanical equipment for assisted breathing, hospital length of stay, patient disposition, discharge diagnosis, and any additional limitations noted by the staff during video visits. Patients admitted to the psychiatric, rehabilitation, pediatric, labor and delivery, forensics wards, or if only a voice call was performed, were excluded. Results: Of the 2068 hospitalizations qualified for chart review, 177 patients have thus far been identified with documented video visits. A total of 1416 video visits were performed in these patients. 71.0% of the patients were intubated during their hospitalization and when video visits occurred. 37.3% of the patients expired, while 24.9% were discharged home or to a short-term rehabilitation center (38.9%). The average length of stay was 35.2 days (SD 2.1). Majority of the diagnoses were COVID-related illnesses (61.0%). Social workers conducted 78.5% of the video visits, followed by physicians (57.7%) and hospital chaplains (9.6%). Average patient age was 62 years-old. Chart review process is currently ongoing. Conclusions: The use of smartphones and tablets for video visits facilitated communication between patients and their families when in-person visits were restricted. We were able to provide visual visits to families when patients were intubated and were unable to verbalize. While a significant number of patients expired during this period, families were able to “see” and communicate with their family members prior to their deaths. The use of this technology is an invaluable tool for families to communicate and partake in patient care. .","PeriodicalId":159700,"journal":{"name":"TP20. TP020 TELEHEALTH AND REMOTE MONITORING FOR PULMONARY, CRITICAL CARE, AND SLEEP","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Smartphones and Tablets for Video Visits Between Patients and Families During the Height of COVID-19 in New York City\",\"authors\":\"E. Tay, C. Kuhner, M. Lalane, A. Kopelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale: In March of 2020, New York City became an epicenter of COVID-19. Due to the risk of airborne transmission and limited personal protective equipment, hospitals restricted patient visitations to protect both healthcare workers and patients. In response to the initiation of this visitation restriction at our hospital on March 18, 2020, we piloted a video-based communication program for families to virtually “visit” their family members in the hospital. This is a quality improvement project designed to evaluate the utility and limitations of these virtual family visits during the pandemic. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients over 17 years-old hospitalized between March 18 and May 31, 2020 for documented video encounters performed by hospital staff at a New York City public hospital. All video calls were performed using Whatsapp, Facetime, or Google Hangout communication app on a hospital-issued smartphone or tablet. Data collected included date of call, patient age, call facilitator, preferred language, patient location during hospitalization, use of mechanical equipment for assisted breathing, hospital length of stay, patient disposition, discharge diagnosis, and any additional limitations noted by the staff during video visits. Patients admitted to the psychiatric, rehabilitation, pediatric, labor and delivery, forensics wards, or if only a voice call was performed, were excluded. Results: Of the 2068 hospitalizations qualified for chart review, 177 patients have thus far been identified with documented video visits. A total of 1416 video visits were performed in these patients. 71.0% of the patients were intubated during their hospitalization and when video visits occurred. 37.3% of the patients expired, while 24.9% were discharged home or to a short-term rehabilitation center (38.9%). The average length of stay was 35.2 days (SD 2.1). Majority of the diagnoses were COVID-related illnesses (61.0%). Social workers conducted 78.5% of the video visits, followed by physicians (57.7%) and hospital chaplains (9.6%). Average patient age was 62 years-old. Chart review process is currently ongoing. Conclusions: The use of smartphones and tablets for video visits facilitated communication between patients and their families when in-person visits were restricted. We were able to provide visual visits to families when patients were intubated and were unable to verbalize. While a significant number of patients expired during this period, families were able to “see” and communicate with their family members prior to their deaths. The use of this technology is an invaluable tool for families to communicate and partake in patient care. .\",\"PeriodicalId\":159700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP20. TP020 TELEHEALTH AND REMOTE MONITORING FOR PULMONARY, CRITICAL CARE, AND SLEEP\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP20. TP020 TELEHEALTH AND REMOTE MONITORING FOR PULMONARY, CRITICAL CARE, AND SLEEP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP20. TP020 TELEHEALTH AND REMOTE MONITORING FOR PULMONARY, CRITICAL CARE, AND SLEEP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:2020年3月,纽约市成为COVID-19的中心。由于空气传播的风险和有限的个人防护设备,医院限制患者就诊,以保护医护人员和患者。针对2020年3月18日在我院启动的探视限制措施,我们试点了一个基于视频的沟通项目,让家属虚拟地“探望”在医院的家人。这是一个质量改进项目,旨在评估大流行期间这些虚拟家庭访问的效用和局限性。方法:对2020年3月18日至5月31日期间住院的所有17岁以上患者进行回顾性图表回顾,以记录纽约市公立医院医院工作人员进行的视频会面。所有视频通话都是在医院配发的智能手机或平板电脑上使用Whatsapp、Facetime或b谷歌Hangout通信应用程序进行的。收集的数据包括呼叫日期、患者年龄、呼叫协调人、首选语言、患者在住院期间的位置、辅助呼吸机械设备的使用、住院时间、患者处置、出院诊断以及工作人员在视频访问期间注意到的任何其他限制。在精神科、康复科、儿科、分娩科、法医病房或仅进行语音通话的患者被排除在外。结果:在符合图表审查条件的2068例住院患者中,迄今为止已确定177例患者有视频就诊记录。这些患者共进行了1416次视频访问。71.0%的患者在住院期间和视频就诊时插管。死亡的占37.3%,出院回家或短期康复中心的占24.9%(38.9%)。平均住院时间为35.2天(SD 2.1)。确诊病例以新冠肺炎相关疾病居多(61.0%)。社会工作者进行了78.5%的视频探访,其次是医生(57.7%)和医院牧师(9.6%)。患者平均年龄62岁。图表审查程序目前正在进行中。结论:使用智能手机和平板电脑进行视频出诊,有助于患者与家属在不能亲自出诊的情况下进行沟通。当病人插管无法说话时,我们能够给家属提供目视探视。虽然在此期间有相当数量的病人去世,但家属能够在他们去世前“看到”并与他们的家人联系。这项技术的使用是家庭沟通和参与病人护理的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of Smartphones and Tablets for Video Visits Between Patients and Families During the Height of COVID-19 in New York City
Rationale: In March of 2020, New York City became an epicenter of COVID-19. Due to the risk of airborne transmission and limited personal protective equipment, hospitals restricted patient visitations to protect both healthcare workers and patients. In response to the initiation of this visitation restriction at our hospital on March 18, 2020, we piloted a video-based communication program for families to virtually “visit” their family members in the hospital. This is a quality improvement project designed to evaluate the utility and limitations of these virtual family visits during the pandemic. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients over 17 years-old hospitalized between March 18 and May 31, 2020 for documented video encounters performed by hospital staff at a New York City public hospital. All video calls were performed using Whatsapp, Facetime, or Google Hangout communication app on a hospital-issued smartphone or tablet. Data collected included date of call, patient age, call facilitator, preferred language, patient location during hospitalization, use of mechanical equipment for assisted breathing, hospital length of stay, patient disposition, discharge diagnosis, and any additional limitations noted by the staff during video visits. Patients admitted to the psychiatric, rehabilitation, pediatric, labor and delivery, forensics wards, or if only a voice call was performed, were excluded. Results: Of the 2068 hospitalizations qualified for chart review, 177 patients have thus far been identified with documented video visits. A total of 1416 video visits were performed in these patients. 71.0% of the patients were intubated during their hospitalization and when video visits occurred. 37.3% of the patients expired, while 24.9% were discharged home or to a short-term rehabilitation center (38.9%). The average length of stay was 35.2 days (SD 2.1). Majority of the diagnoses were COVID-related illnesses (61.0%). Social workers conducted 78.5% of the video visits, followed by physicians (57.7%) and hospital chaplains (9.6%). Average patient age was 62 years-old. Chart review process is currently ongoing. Conclusions: The use of smartphones and tablets for video visits facilitated communication between patients and their families when in-person visits were restricted. We were able to provide visual visits to families when patients were intubated and were unable to verbalize. While a significant number of patients expired during this period, families were able to “see” and communicate with their family members prior to their deaths. The use of this technology is an invaluable tool for families to communicate and partake in patient care. .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信