需求规范中的领域一致性

Satyajit Acharya, C. George, H. Mohanty
{"title":"需求规范中的领域一致性","authors":"Satyajit Acharya, C. George, H. Mohanty","doi":"10.1109/QSIC.2005.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fixing requirements errors that are detected late in the software development life cycle can be extremely costly. So, finding problems in requirements specification early in the development cycle is critical and crucial. A formal specification can reduce errors by reducing ambiguity and imprecision and by making some instances of inconsistency and incompleteness obvious. In this paper, with an example of a moderately complex system of the mobile computing domain, we discuss how the consistency conditions found during initial abstract formal specification help in detecting logical errors during early stages of system development. We also discuss the importance of consistency conditions while modelling the domain of a complex system and show how the identified consistency conditions help in better understanding the specification and to gain confidence on the correctness of the specification. We use a combination of techniques, like specification inspection and testing the executable specification of a prototype using test cases, to validate the specification against the requirements as well as to ensure that the specified consistency conditions are respected and maintained by the operations defined in the specification.","PeriodicalId":150211,"journal":{"name":"Fifth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC'05)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Domain consistency in requirements specification\",\"authors\":\"Satyajit Acharya, C. George, H. Mohanty\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QSIC.2005.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fixing requirements errors that are detected late in the software development life cycle can be extremely costly. So, finding problems in requirements specification early in the development cycle is critical and crucial. A formal specification can reduce errors by reducing ambiguity and imprecision and by making some instances of inconsistency and incompleteness obvious. In this paper, with an example of a moderately complex system of the mobile computing domain, we discuss how the consistency conditions found during initial abstract formal specification help in detecting logical errors during early stages of system development. We also discuss the importance of consistency conditions while modelling the domain of a complex system and show how the identified consistency conditions help in better understanding the specification and to gain confidence on the correctness of the specification. We use a combination of techniques, like specification inspection and testing the executable specification of a prototype using test cases, to validate the specification against the requirements as well as to ensure that the specified consistency conditions are respected and maintained by the operations defined in the specification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC'05)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2005.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2005.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

修复在软件开发生命周期后期检测到的需求错误是非常昂贵的。因此,在开发周期的早期发现需求规范中的问题是至关重要的。正式规范可以通过减少歧义和不精确以及使一些不一致和不完整的实例变得明显来减少错误。本文以移动计算领域的一个中等复杂系统为例,讨论了在初始抽象形式化规范中发现的一致性条件如何帮助在系统开发的早期阶段检测逻辑错误。我们还讨论了在对复杂系统的域进行建模时一致性条件的重要性,并展示了确定的一致性条件如何有助于更好地理解规范并获得对规范正确性的信心。我们使用技术的组合,如规范检查和使用测试用例测试原型的可执行规范,根据需求验证规范,并确保规范中定义的操作尊重和维护指定的一致性条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Domain consistency in requirements specification
Fixing requirements errors that are detected late in the software development life cycle can be extremely costly. So, finding problems in requirements specification early in the development cycle is critical and crucial. A formal specification can reduce errors by reducing ambiguity and imprecision and by making some instances of inconsistency and incompleteness obvious. In this paper, with an example of a moderately complex system of the mobile computing domain, we discuss how the consistency conditions found during initial abstract formal specification help in detecting logical errors during early stages of system development. We also discuss the importance of consistency conditions while modelling the domain of a complex system and show how the identified consistency conditions help in better understanding the specification and to gain confidence on the correctness of the specification. We use a combination of techniques, like specification inspection and testing the executable specification of a prototype using test cases, to validate the specification against the requirements as well as to ensure that the specified consistency conditions are respected and maintained by the operations defined in the specification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信