{"title":"垄断必然是垄断","authors":"Ash Navabi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2972793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I provide a simple proof that a monopsony must necessarily be a monopoly. This is in contrast to authors who have previously asserted that either no relation exists between monopsony and monopoly, or who have relied upon additional assumptions to make an inference about monopolisitic nature of a monopsony.","PeriodicalId":142139,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monopoly","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Monopsony is Necessarily a Monopoly\",\"authors\":\"Ash Navabi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2972793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I provide a simple proof that a monopsony must necessarily be a monopoly. This is in contrast to authors who have previously asserted that either no relation exists between monopsony and monopoly, or who have relied upon additional assumptions to make an inference about monopolisitic nature of a monopsony.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Monopoly\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Monopoly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2972793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monopoly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2972793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
I provide a simple proof that a monopsony must necessarily be a monopoly. This is in contrast to authors who have previously asserted that either no relation exists between monopsony and monopoly, or who have relied upon additional assumptions to make an inference about monopolisitic nature of a monopsony.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
