{"title":"用MATHEMATICA分析常微分方程的数值方法","authors":"Jaime Segarra-Escandón","doi":"10.21017/rimci.2020.v7.n13.a72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, the main objective is to perform the comparative analysis of numerical methods (Explicit Euler, Runge Kutta 4 and LocallyExact) for the resolution of differential equations. To fulfill the purpose of this study, the system of differential equations of the Lotka-Volterra model was used and the mathematical software Wolfram Mathematica was used. To perform the comparison of the numerical methods the Lotka-Volterra model was solved using the NdSolve command of Mathematica, this result was compared with the Methods Explicit Euler, Runge Kutta 4 and LocallyExact. The results obtained from the phase diagrams and the point table of the interactions indicate that the Runge Kutta 4 method has greater precision, followed by the LocallyExact method. The explicit Euler method draws considerably away from the result of NDSolve. \nDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/rimci.2020.v7.n13.a72","PeriodicalId":267527,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ingeniería, Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Información","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANÁLISIS DE LOS MÉTODOS NUMÉRICOS EN ECUACIONES DIFERENCIALES ORDINARIAS UTILIZANDO MATHEMATICA\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Segarra-Escandón\",\"doi\":\"10.21017/rimci.2020.v7.n13.a72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this research, the main objective is to perform the comparative analysis of numerical methods (Explicit Euler, Runge Kutta 4 and LocallyExact) for the resolution of differential equations. To fulfill the purpose of this study, the system of differential equations of the Lotka-Volterra model was used and the mathematical software Wolfram Mathematica was used. To perform the comparison of the numerical methods the Lotka-Volterra model was solved using the NdSolve command of Mathematica, this result was compared with the Methods Explicit Euler, Runge Kutta 4 and LocallyExact. The results obtained from the phase diagrams and the point table of the interactions indicate that the Runge Kutta 4 method has greater precision, followed by the LocallyExact method. The explicit Euler method draws considerably away from the result of NDSolve. \\nDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/rimci.2020.v7.n13.a72\",\"PeriodicalId\":267527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Ingeniería, Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Información\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Ingeniería, Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Información\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21017/rimci.2020.v7.n13.a72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ingeniería, Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Información","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21017/rimci.2020.v7.n13.a72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
ANÁLISIS DE LOS MÉTODOS NUMÉRICOS EN ECUACIONES DIFERENCIALES ORDINARIAS UTILIZANDO MATHEMATICA
In this research, the main objective is to perform the comparative analysis of numerical methods (Explicit Euler, Runge Kutta 4 and LocallyExact) for the resolution of differential equations. To fulfill the purpose of this study, the system of differential equations of the Lotka-Volterra model was used and the mathematical software Wolfram Mathematica was used. To perform the comparison of the numerical methods the Lotka-Volterra model was solved using the NdSolve command of Mathematica, this result was compared with the Methods Explicit Euler, Runge Kutta 4 and LocallyExact. The results obtained from the phase diagrams and the point table of the interactions indicate that the Runge Kutta 4 method has greater precision, followed by the LocallyExact method. The explicit Euler method draws considerably away from the result of NDSolve.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/rimci.2020.v7.n13.a72