评论

Francesco Giavazzi
{"title":"评论","authors":"Francesco Giavazzi","doi":"10.1086/595996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reinhart and Reinhart offer an important contribution to our understanding of the effects of large capital inflows. The algorithm they develop allows us to classify and analyze episodes of capital inflow bonanzas in a very large sample of countries, both advanced and emerging economies. The sample includes 181 countries during 1980–2007 and a subset of 66 over 1960–2007. It is the largest so far analyzed in the literature. I have two small concerns with the paper and one more interesting query. Let us start by considering the results for advanced economies. As the authors themselves say, the results for this group of countries are less stark than for developing economies. They also seem to be driven by a few odd observations concerning not the definition of “bonanzas,” but of their effects. In the data (table 6) most euro area countries appear to have experienced a currency crash (defined as an annual depreciation vs. theU.S. dollar of 15%ormore) in 2005.During 2005 the euro depreciated against the dollar 12%, but beyond the size of the depreciation—which is below the 15% threshold—it is unclear whether one should relate the depreciation of the common European currency to the three bonanza episodes that occurredwithin a period spanning the previous 3 years: France, Portugal, and Spain (table 3). The weakening of the euro in 2005 mostly mirrored the divergence in growth between the euro area and the United States: it had little to do with the three bonanza episodes. I am similarly puzzled by two episodes of banking crises: France in 1994–95 and Italy in 1990–95. Although both events fit the definition of a banking crisis given in table 5, it is unclear whether one should relate them to a previous bonanza. In France the episode corresponds to the government recapitalization of Crédit Lyonnais, a state‐owned bank that ran into troublewhen it became known that, as a result of a financial scandal, it had become the de facto owner of Metro‐Goldwyn‐Mayer, the world’s most famous movie studio. In Italy it corresponds to the state bailout of BancodiNapoli,","PeriodicalId":353207,"journal":{"name":"NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Giavazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/595996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reinhart and Reinhart offer an important contribution to our understanding of the effects of large capital inflows. The algorithm they develop allows us to classify and analyze episodes of capital inflow bonanzas in a very large sample of countries, both advanced and emerging economies. The sample includes 181 countries during 1980–2007 and a subset of 66 over 1960–2007. It is the largest so far analyzed in the literature. I have two small concerns with the paper and one more interesting query. Let us start by considering the results for advanced economies. As the authors themselves say, the results for this group of countries are less stark than for developing economies. They also seem to be driven by a few odd observations concerning not the definition of “bonanzas,” but of their effects. In the data (table 6) most euro area countries appear to have experienced a currency crash (defined as an annual depreciation vs. theU.S. dollar of 15%ormore) in 2005.During 2005 the euro depreciated against the dollar 12%, but beyond the size of the depreciation—which is below the 15% threshold—it is unclear whether one should relate the depreciation of the common European currency to the three bonanza episodes that occurredwithin a period spanning the previous 3 years: France, Portugal, and Spain (table 3). The weakening of the euro in 2005 mostly mirrored the divergence in growth between the euro area and the United States: it had little to do with the three bonanza episodes. I am similarly puzzled by two episodes of banking crises: France in 1994–95 and Italy in 1990–95. Although both events fit the definition of a banking crisis given in table 5, it is unclear whether one should relate them to a previous bonanza. In France the episode corresponds to the government recapitalization of Crédit Lyonnais, a state‐owned bank that ran into troublewhen it became known that, as a result of a financial scandal, it had become the de facto owner of Metro‐Goldwyn‐Mayer, the world’s most famous movie studio. In Italy it corresponds to the state bailout of BancodiNapoli,\",\"PeriodicalId\":353207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/595996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/595996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

莱因哈特和莱因哈特对我们理解大规模资本流入的影响作出了重要贡献。他们开发的算法使我们能够对大量样本国家(包括发达经济体和新兴经济体)的资本流入富矿事件进行分类和分析。样本包括1980-2007年期间的181个国家和1960-2007年期间的66个子集。这是迄今为止在文献中分析的最大的。我对这篇论文有两个小问题,还有一个更有趣的问题。让我们先考虑一下发达经济体的结果。正如作者自己所说,这组国家的结果没有发展中经济体那么明显。他们似乎还受到一些奇怪的观察的驱使,这些观察不是关于“富矿”的定义,而是关于它们的影响。在数据(表6)中,大多数欧元区国家似乎经历了货币崩溃(定义为相对于美国的年度贬值)。美元在2005年上涨15%或更多)。2005年,欧元对美元贬值了12%,但在贬值幅度之外(低于15%的门槛),人们不清楚是否应该将欧洲共同货币的贬值与前3年期间发生的三个繁荣时期联系起来:法国、葡萄牙和西班牙(表3)。2005年欧元的疲软主要反映了欧元区和美国之间增长的分歧。这与那三集大热剧集没有什么关系。我同样对两次银行业危机感到困惑:1994 - 1995年的法国和1990 - 1995年的意大利。尽管这两个事件都符合表5所给出的银行业危机的定义,但是否应该将它们与之前的繁荣联系起来尚不清楚。在法国,这一事件与政府对cramediit Lyonnais的资本重组相对应。cramediit Lyonnais是一家国有银行,由于一桩财务丑闻,它成为了世界上最著名的电影制片厂Metro - Goldwyn - Mayer的实际所有者,因此陷入了困境。在意大利,这相当于对迪纳波利银行的国家救助,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comment
Reinhart and Reinhart offer an important contribution to our understanding of the effects of large capital inflows. The algorithm they develop allows us to classify and analyze episodes of capital inflow bonanzas in a very large sample of countries, both advanced and emerging economies. The sample includes 181 countries during 1980–2007 and a subset of 66 over 1960–2007. It is the largest so far analyzed in the literature. I have two small concerns with the paper and one more interesting query. Let us start by considering the results for advanced economies. As the authors themselves say, the results for this group of countries are less stark than for developing economies. They also seem to be driven by a few odd observations concerning not the definition of “bonanzas,” but of their effects. In the data (table 6) most euro area countries appear to have experienced a currency crash (defined as an annual depreciation vs. theU.S. dollar of 15%ormore) in 2005.During 2005 the euro depreciated against the dollar 12%, but beyond the size of the depreciation—which is below the 15% threshold—it is unclear whether one should relate the depreciation of the common European currency to the three bonanza episodes that occurredwithin a period spanning the previous 3 years: France, Portugal, and Spain (table 3). The weakening of the euro in 2005 mostly mirrored the divergence in growth between the euro area and the United States: it had little to do with the three bonanza episodes. I am similarly puzzled by two episodes of banking crises: France in 1994–95 and Italy in 1990–95. Although both events fit the definition of a banking crisis given in table 5, it is unclear whether one should relate them to a previous bonanza. In France the episode corresponds to the government recapitalization of Crédit Lyonnais, a state‐owned bank that ran into troublewhen it became known that, as a result of a financial scandal, it had become the de facto owner of Metro‐Goldwyn‐Mayer, the world’s most famous movie studio. In Italy it corresponds to the state bailout of BancodiNapoli,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信