{"title":"转型经济中私有化公司的经营业绩-以波兰、匈牙利和捷克共和国为例","authors":"Wolfgang Aussenegg, R. Jelic","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.391576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine operating performance of 154 Polish, Hungarian and Czech companies that were fully or partially privatized between January 1990 and December 1998. Overall, our results are different from results of similar studies on operating performance of companies privatized in developed and other developing countries (Souza and Megginson, 1999; Boubakri and Cosset, 1998). For example, privatized firms in our sample did not manage to increase profitability, and significantly reduced efficiency and output in the post-privatization period. Enterprises privatized through mass privatization programs (Czech SOEs) achieved lower profitability in the post-privatization period compared to their counterparts privatized through case-by-case method. Czech companies have also maintained much higher bank borrowings after privatizations then their Polish and Hungarian counterparts. We further document that private sector IPOs underperform their privatization counterparts in terms of profitability, efficiency, capital investments and output. Finally, firms' size does not seem to influence key performance measures in selected countries.","PeriodicalId":159491,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Empirical Studies of Firms & Industries in Transitional Economies (Topic)","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operating Performance of Privatized Companies in Transition Economies - the Case of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Aussenegg, R. Jelic\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.391576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine operating performance of 154 Polish, Hungarian and Czech companies that were fully or partially privatized between January 1990 and December 1998. Overall, our results are different from results of similar studies on operating performance of companies privatized in developed and other developing countries (Souza and Megginson, 1999; Boubakri and Cosset, 1998). For example, privatized firms in our sample did not manage to increase profitability, and significantly reduced efficiency and output in the post-privatization period. Enterprises privatized through mass privatization programs (Czech SOEs) achieved lower profitability in the post-privatization period compared to their counterparts privatized through case-by-case method. Czech companies have also maintained much higher bank borrowings after privatizations then their Polish and Hungarian counterparts. We further document that private sector IPOs underperform their privatization counterparts in terms of profitability, efficiency, capital investments and output. Finally, firms' size does not seem to influence key performance measures in selected countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Empirical Studies of Firms & Industries in Transitional Economies (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Empirical Studies of Firms & Industries in Transitional Economies (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.391576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Empirical Studies of Firms & Industries in Transitional Economies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.391576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
摘要
我们考察了1990年1月至1998年12月间全部或部分私有化的154家波兰、匈牙利和捷克公司的经营业绩。总体而言,我们的研究结果不同于对发达国家和其他发展中国家私有化公司经营绩效的类似研究结果(Souza和Megginson, 1999;Boubakri and Cosset, 1998)。例如,我们样本中的私有化公司并没有设法提高盈利能力,而且在私有化后时期显著降低了效率和产出。通过大规模私有化计划私有化的企业(捷克国有企业)在私有化后的盈利能力低于通过个案方法私有化的企业。在私有化之后,捷克公司的银行借款也比波兰和匈牙利公司高得多。我们进一步证明,私营部门ipo在盈利能力、效率、资本投资和产出方面表现不如私有化同行。最后,在选定的国家,公司的规模似乎并不影响关键绩效指标。
Operating Performance of Privatized Companies in Transition Economies - the Case of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic
We examine operating performance of 154 Polish, Hungarian and Czech companies that were fully or partially privatized between January 1990 and December 1998. Overall, our results are different from results of similar studies on operating performance of companies privatized in developed and other developing countries (Souza and Megginson, 1999; Boubakri and Cosset, 1998). For example, privatized firms in our sample did not manage to increase profitability, and significantly reduced efficiency and output in the post-privatization period. Enterprises privatized through mass privatization programs (Czech SOEs) achieved lower profitability in the post-privatization period compared to their counterparts privatized through case-by-case method. Czech companies have also maintained much higher bank borrowings after privatizations then their Polish and Hungarian counterparts. We further document that private sector IPOs underperform their privatization counterparts in terms of profitability, efficiency, capital investments and output. Finally, firms' size does not seem to influence key performance measures in selected countries.