赞扬例行公事

Intellectual News Pub Date : 2001-03-01 DOI:10.1080/17496977.2001.11417804

N. Jardine

{"title":"赞扬例行公事","authors":"N. Jardine","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2001.11417804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am stung by this remark, having just finished co-editing a volume in which many of the contributions deal with authorship of precisely the kinds thus pompously dismissed. 2 To settle the score with Whewell, I here offer some reasons for holding the close study of the production, distribution, and vicissitudes of reception of such 'routine' works to be crucial for an understanding of authorship and innovation in the sciences, indeed in all intellectual disciplines. Primarily, of course, I shall be out to demonstrate the importance of such works accord-","PeriodicalId":360014,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual News","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Praise of the Routine\",\"authors\":\"N. Jardine\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17496977.2001.11417804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am stung by this remark, having just finished co-editing a volume in which many of the contributions deal with authorship of precisely the kinds thus pompously dismissed. 2 To settle the score with Whewell, I here offer some reasons for holding the close study of the production, distribution, and vicissitudes of reception of such 'routine' works to be crucial for an understanding of authorship and innovation in the sciences, indeed in all intellectual disciplines. Primarily, of course, I shall be out to demonstrate the importance of such works accord-\",\"PeriodicalId\":360014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual News\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2001.11417804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2001.11417804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这句话刺痛了我，因为我刚刚完成了与人合编的一本书，其中许多文章所涉及的正是这种被傲慢地摒弃的作者身份。为了与休威尔解决这个问题，我在这里提供一些理由，说明对这种“常规”作品的生产、分配和接受的变迁进行仔细研究，对于理解科学中的作者和创新至关重要，实际上在所有知识学科中都是如此。当然，我首先要证明这类工作的重要性

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

In Praise of the Routine

I am stung by this remark, having just finished co-editing a volume in which many of the contributions deal with authorship of precisely the kinds thus pompously dismissed. 2 To settle the score with Whewell, I here offer some reasons for holding the close study of the production, distribution, and vicissitudes of reception of such 'routine' works to be crucial for an understanding of authorship and innovation in the sciences, indeed in all intellectual disciplines. Primarily, of course, I shall be out to demonstrate the importance of such works accord-

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Intellectual News

自引率

0.00%

发文量