教授与学生认知差异与能力本位文科课程教育需求分析——以A学院为例

I. Seo
{"title":"教授与学生认知差异与能力本位文科课程教育需求分析——以A学院为例","authors":"I. Seo","doi":"10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of developing questions to investigate the difference in the perceptions and educational needs of professors and students concerning the competency-based liberal arts curriculum, and through conducting a corresponding survey, 33 professors and 502 enrolled students responded for two weeks in November of 2022. The analysis method utilized the Borich Demand Formula and the Locus for Focus Model. First, as a result of examining the difference in perceptions between professors and students about liberal arts education in A college, the survey found that students had a positive perception of the liberal arts curriculum compared to professors regarding all of the questions. Both professors and students were highly aware of the ‘relevance of liberal arts education level’ while the items showing statistically significant differences were the questions dealing with the ‘adequacy of the number of subjects opened’ and the ‘help to grow as professionals’. Second, as a result of analyzing the educational needs of our university's liberal arts curriculum using the Borich Formula and the Locus for Focus Model, the professors cited ‘lectures with teaching methods suitable for learning’, ‘sufficient communication with students’, and ‘diversity in liberal arts course selection’. Student ‘B’ determined that ‘lecture progress with a teaching method suitable for the learning content’ was their top priority when it came to improvement. Based on these results, to operate a better liberal arts curriculum, we need to seek ways to expand the range of choices for liberal arts education. Furthermore, we need to derive important basic vocational skills according to majors during the reorganization of liberal arts education at universities. This means that liberal arts education needs to reflect these changes in both its design and operational aspects. However, due to the different enrollment periods and limited graduation credits allocated to each department, there are real limitations in designing a course that fully reflects these educational demands. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze in detail the students' needs in order to immediately meet their educational goals, and to establish a flexible curriculum that reflects their demands for non-subject programs.","PeriodicalId":267224,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of General Education","volume":"229 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing Differences in Perceptions between Professors and Students and Educational Needs for Competency-Based Liberal Arts Course\\n-Focusing on A College\",\"authors\":\"I. Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a result of developing questions to investigate the difference in the perceptions and educational needs of professors and students concerning the competency-based liberal arts curriculum, and through conducting a corresponding survey, 33 professors and 502 enrolled students responded for two weeks in November of 2022. The analysis method utilized the Borich Demand Formula and the Locus for Focus Model. First, as a result of examining the difference in perceptions between professors and students about liberal arts education in A college, the survey found that students had a positive perception of the liberal arts curriculum compared to professors regarding all of the questions. Both professors and students were highly aware of the ‘relevance of liberal arts education level’ while the items showing statistically significant differences were the questions dealing with the ‘adequacy of the number of subjects opened’ and the ‘help to grow as professionals’. Second, as a result of analyzing the educational needs of our university's liberal arts curriculum using the Borich Formula and the Locus for Focus Model, the professors cited ‘lectures with teaching methods suitable for learning’, ‘sufficient communication with students’, and ‘diversity in liberal arts course selection’. Student ‘B’ determined that ‘lecture progress with a teaching method suitable for the learning content’ was their top priority when it came to improvement. Based on these results, to operate a better liberal arts curriculum, we need to seek ways to expand the range of choices for liberal arts education. Furthermore, we need to derive important basic vocational skills according to majors during the reorganization of liberal arts education at universities. This means that liberal arts education needs to reflect these changes in both its design and operational aspects. However, due to the different enrollment periods and limited graduation credits allocated to each department, there are real limitations in designing a course that fully reflects these educational demands. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze in detail the students' needs in order to immediately meet their educational goals, and to establish a flexible curriculum that reflects their demands for non-subject programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Association of General Education\",\"volume\":\"229 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Association of General Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of General Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了调查教授和学生对以能力为基础的文科课程的看法和教育需求的差异,并通过相应的调查,在2022年11月的两周内,33名教授和502名在校生做出了回应。分析方法采用Borich需求公式和焦点轨迹模型。首先,通过调查a大学教授和学生对文科教育的看法差异,调查发现,在所有问题上,学生对文科课程的看法都比教授积极。教授和学生都高度意识到“文科教育水平的相关性”,而在“开设科目数量的充分性”和“帮助专业人士成长”的问题上表现出统计学上显著差异。其次,通过运用Borich公式和焦点轨迹模型分析我校文科课程的教育需求,教授们提出了“适合学习的教学方法”、“与学生充分沟通”和“文科课程选择的多样性”。学生B认为,“采用适合学习内容的教学方法进行讲课”是他们提高教学质量的首要任务。在此基础上,为了更好地运营文科课程,我们需要寻求扩大文科教育选择范围的方法。此外,在大学文科教育的重组中,我们需要根据专业来获得重要的基础职业技能。这意味着文科教育需要在设计和操作方面反映这些变化。然而,由于不同的入学时间和分配给每个部门的有限的毕业学分,在设计一门充分反映这些教育需求的课程时确实存在局限性。因此,有必要详细分析学生的需求,以便立即满足他们的教育目标,并建立灵活的课程,以反映他们对非学科课程的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing Differences in Perceptions between Professors and Students and Educational Needs for Competency-Based Liberal Arts Course -Focusing on A College
As a result of developing questions to investigate the difference in the perceptions and educational needs of professors and students concerning the competency-based liberal arts curriculum, and through conducting a corresponding survey, 33 professors and 502 enrolled students responded for two weeks in November of 2022. The analysis method utilized the Borich Demand Formula and the Locus for Focus Model. First, as a result of examining the difference in perceptions between professors and students about liberal arts education in A college, the survey found that students had a positive perception of the liberal arts curriculum compared to professors regarding all of the questions. Both professors and students were highly aware of the ‘relevance of liberal arts education level’ while the items showing statistically significant differences were the questions dealing with the ‘adequacy of the number of subjects opened’ and the ‘help to grow as professionals’. Second, as a result of analyzing the educational needs of our university's liberal arts curriculum using the Borich Formula and the Locus for Focus Model, the professors cited ‘lectures with teaching methods suitable for learning’, ‘sufficient communication with students’, and ‘diversity in liberal arts course selection’. Student ‘B’ determined that ‘lecture progress with a teaching method suitable for the learning content’ was their top priority when it came to improvement. Based on these results, to operate a better liberal arts curriculum, we need to seek ways to expand the range of choices for liberal arts education. Furthermore, we need to derive important basic vocational skills according to majors during the reorganization of liberal arts education at universities. This means that liberal arts education needs to reflect these changes in both its design and operational aspects. However, due to the different enrollment periods and limited graduation credits allocated to each department, there are real limitations in designing a course that fully reflects these educational demands. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze in detail the students' needs in order to immediately meet their educational goals, and to establish a flexible curriculum that reflects their demands for non-subject programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信