{"title":"不同衡量标准下的基金绩效研究:来自英国市场的证据","authors":"Wang Lin-lu, P. Spencer, Wang Yu-dong","doi":"10.1109/ICMSE.2014.6930395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both the micro ability to stock selecting and market timing are important to fund managers. Traditional measures for mutual funds performances are very sensitive with the bias, resulting from the variation of risk and risk-premium with time. In order to balance these kinds of variations, lagged public information factors may be helpful. Including short-range UK Treasury Bill (Rf) and dividend yields (DY), different fund returns are predicted with additional information. This paper empirically estimate the average performance of 68 UK close-end mutual funds invested in domestic market over a meaningful decade-period from 2000 to 2010, applying the traditional and conditioning versions of capital asset pricing model and Fama-French model. Meanwhile, Jensen's (1968) traditional strategy and conditional measure of Ferson and Schadt (1996) are involved followed by a set of time-series regressions in order to compare different measure's significance in T test and F test. The findings are that CAPM not only has higher fitness butt also decreases the minus bias of market timing when adds conditional information. However, FF models show contrast evaluation and unexpected inferior outlets based on UK mutual funds between 2000 and 2010.","PeriodicalId":197239,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 21th Annual Conference Proceedings","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on fund performance to various measures: Evidence from UK market\",\"authors\":\"Wang Lin-lu, P. Spencer, Wang Yu-dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMSE.2014.6930395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Both the micro ability to stock selecting and market timing are important to fund managers. Traditional measures for mutual funds performances are very sensitive with the bias, resulting from the variation of risk and risk-premium with time. In order to balance these kinds of variations, lagged public information factors may be helpful. Including short-range UK Treasury Bill (Rf) and dividend yields (DY), different fund returns are predicted with additional information. This paper empirically estimate the average performance of 68 UK close-end mutual funds invested in domestic market over a meaningful decade-period from 2000 to 2010, applying the traditional and conditioning versions of capital asset pricing model and Fama-French model. Meanwhile, Jensen's (1968) traditional strategy and conditional measure of Ferson and Schadt (1996) are involved followed by a set of time-series regressions in order to compare different measure's significance in T test and F test. The findings are that CAPM not only has higher fitness butt also decreases the minus bias of market timing when adds conditional information. However, FF models show contrast evaluation and unexpected inferior outlets based on UK mutual funds between 2000 and 2010.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 21th Annual Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 21th Annual Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2014.6930395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 21th Annual Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2014.6930395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基金经理的微观选股能力和择时能力都很重要。由于风险和风险溢价随时间的变化,传统的共同基金绩效指标对偏差非常敏感。为了平衡这些差异,滞后的公共信息因素可能会有所帮助。包括短期英国国库券(Rf)和股息收益率(DY),不同的基金回报预测与附加信息。本文运用资本资产定价模型和Fama-French模型的传统版本和条件版本,对2000 - 2010年有意义的10年间投资于国内市场的68只英国封闭式共同基金的平均业绩进行了实证估计。同时,采用Jensen(1968)的传统策略和Ferson and Schadt(1996)的条件测度,并进行一组时间序列回归,比较不同测度在T检验和F检验中的显著性。结果表明,CAPM不仅具有较高的适应度,而且在加入条件信息时,CAPM还能降低市场择时的负偏倚。然而,FF模型显示了基于2000年至2010年英国共同基金的对比评估和意外的劣势网点。
Study on fund performance to various measures: Evidence from UK market
Both the micro ability to stock selecting and market timing are important to fund managers. Traditional measures for mutual funds performances are very sensitive with the bias, resulting from the variation of risk and risk-premium with time. In order to balance these kinds of variations, lagged public information factors may be helpful. Including short-range UK Treasury Bill (Rf) and dividend yields (DY), different fund returns are predicted with additional information. This paper empirically estimate the average performance of 68 UK close-end mutual funds invested in domestic market over a meaningful decade-period from 2000 to 2010, applying the traditional and conditioning versions of capital asset pricing model and Fama-French model. Meanwhile, Jensen's (1968) traditional strategy and conditional measure of Ferson and Schadt (1996) are involved followed by a set of time-series regressions in order to compare different measure's significance in T test and F test. The findings are that CAPM not only has higher fitness butt also decreases the minus bias of market timing when adds conditional information. However, FF models show contrast evaluation and unexpected inferior outlets based on UK mutual funds between 2000 and 2010.