作为地质力学数据来源的可控岩心刮擦的先进方法

K. V. Toropetsky, G. Borisov, M. Samoilov, I. Eltsov
{"title":"作为地质力学数据来源的可控岩心刮擦的先进方法","authors":"K. V. Toropetsky, G. Borisov, M. Samoilov, I. Eltsov","doi":"10.2118/201984-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The established practice of geomechanical testing includes the procedures of core sampling and marking, as well as core plug drilling out and testing. The key challenge is that a selection of core plugs is physically or economically limited. The classical core analysis offers a limited and discrete data set. Along with that, the tests carried out on a set of core plugs are dependent upon the core quality and the accuracy of selection of the core plugs sharing identical properties. These constraints impair accuracy and reliability of geomechanical models.\n This paper describes controlled core scratching (CST) as a method of geomechanical testing of full-size cores. Physically, the CST method is based on resistance measurements of the of full-size cores to scratching. Depending on the cutter penetration depth and the core sample scratching rate, the force characterizes unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and/or fracture resistance of the rock.\n The principal CST advantage is that it provides accurate and diverse continuous geomechanical rock properties. The application of the CST method enhances comprehensive core analysis accuracy, synthetic physical & mechanical parameters reliability and, therefore, geomechanical modeling precision. In practice, the CST method applied in conjunction with the classical geomechnical core analysis enhances the quality of drilling, completion, frac'ing, and field development support in general.\n This paper presents a comparative study of geomechanical models that incorporate synthetic curves for unconfined compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) and cohesion strength (CS), derived from the CST and well logging data, using a well that is drilled through halocarbonates and clastics as an example. The comparative study of the CST-based and log-based geomechanical models demonstrated that the CST-based model outputs robust correlations and detailed distinctive curves of physical & mechanical properties and clear stratification boundaries.","PeriodicalId":359083,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 27, 2020","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Method of Controlled Core Scratching as a Source of Geomechanical Data\",\"authors\":\"K. V. Toropetsky, G. Borisov, M. Samoilov, I. Eltsov\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/201984-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The established practice of geomechanical testing includes the procedures of core sampling and marking, as well as core plug drilling out and testing. The key challenge is that a selection of core plugs is physically or economically limited. The classical core analysis offers a limited and discrete data set. Along with that, the tests carried out on a set of core plugs are dependent upon the core quality and the accuracy of selection of the core plugs sharing identical properties. These constraints impair accuracy and reliability of geomechanical models.\\n This paper describes controlled core scratching (CST) as a method of geomechanical testing of full-size cores. Physically, the CST method is based on resistance measurements of the of full-size cores to scratching. Depending on the cutter penetration depth and the core sample scratching rate, the force characterizes unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and/or fracture resistance of the rock.\\n The principal CST advantage is that it provides accurate and diverse continuous geomechanical rock properties. The application of the CST method enhances comprehensive core analysis accuracy, synthetic physical & mechanical parameters reliability and, therefore, geomechanical modeling precision. In practice, the CST method applied in conjunction with the classical geomechnical core analysis enhances the quality of drilling, completion, frac'ing, and field development support in general.\\n This paper presents a comparative study of geomechanical models that incorporate synthetic curves for unconfined compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) and cohesion strength (CS), derived from the CST and well logging data, using a well that is drilled through halocarbonates and clastics as an example. The comparative study of the CST-based and log-based geomechanical models demonstrated that the CST-based model outputs robust correlations and detailed distinctive curves of physical & mechanical properties and clear stratification boundaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 27, 2020\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 27, 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/201984-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 27, 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/201984-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地质力学测试的既定做法包括岩心取样和标记程序,以及岩心塞钻出和测试。关键的挑战是,岩心桥塞的选择在物理上或经济上是有限的。经典的核心分析提供了一个有限的和离散的数据集。除此之外,对一组岩心桥塞进行的测试取决于岩心质量和选择具有相同性能的岩心桥塞的准确性。这些制约因素影响了地质力学模型的准确性和可靠性。本文介绍了控制岩心刮伤(CST)作为全尺寸岩心地质力学测试的一种方法。物理上,CST方法是基于全尺寸岩芯的刮擦阻力测量。根据刀具的穿透深度和岩心样品的刮擦速率,该力表征了岩石的无侧限抗压强度(UCS)和/或抗破裂性。CST的主要优势在于它提供了精确和多样化的连续岩石地质力学特性。CST方法的应用提高了岩心综合分析的精度和综合物理力学参数的可靠性,从而提高了地质力学建模的精度。在实践中,CST方法与经典地质技术岩心分析相结合,总体上提高了钻井、完井、压裂和油田开发支持的质量。本文以一口钻过盐碳酸盐岩和碎屑的井为例,对地质力学模型进行了对比研究,该模型结合了无侧限抗压强度(UCS)、巴西抗拉强度(BTS)和粘聚强度(CS)的合成曲线,这些曲线来自CST和测井数据。基于cst的地质力学模型与基于测井的地质力学模型的对比研究表明,基于cst的地质力学模型具有较强的相关性,具有详细的、独特的物理力学性质曲线和清晰的分层边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advanced Method of Controlled Core Scratching as a Source of Geomechanical Data
The established practice of geomechanical testing includes the procedures of core sampling and marking, as well as core plug drilling out and testing. The key challenge is that a selection of core plugs is physically or economically limited. The classical core analysis offers a limited and discrete data set. Along with that, the tests carried out on a set of core plugs are dependent upon the core quality and the accuracy of selection of the core plugs sharing identical properties. These constraints impair accuracy and reliability of geomechanical models. This paper describes controlled core scratching (CST) as a method of geomechanical testing of full-size cores. Physically, the CST method is based on resistance measurements of the of full-size cores to scratching. Depending on the cutter penetration depth and the core sample scratching rate, the force characterizes unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and/or fracture resistance of the rock. The principal CST advantage is that it provides accurate and diverse continuous geomechanical rock properties. The application of the CST method enhances comprehensive core analysis accuracy, synthetic physical & mechanical parameters reliability and, therefore, geomechanical modeling precision. In practice, the CST method applied in conjunction with the classical geomechnical core analysis enhances the quality of drilling, completion, frac'ing, and field development support in general. This paper presents a comparative study of geomechanical models that incorporate synthetic curves for unconfined compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) and cohesion strength (CS), derived from the CST and well logging data, using a well that is drilled through halocarbonates and clastics as an example. The comparative study of the CST-based and log-based geomechanical models demonstrated that the CST-based model outputs robust correlations and detailed distinctive curves of physical & mechanical properties and clear stratification boundaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信