利用跨国最佳教学实践改进STEM的微积分教育

G. Grabarnik, L. Kim-Tyan, Serge Yaskolko
{"title":"利用跨国最佳教学实践改进STEM的微积分教育","authors":"G. Grabarnik, L. Kim-Tyan, Serge Yaskolko","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recently completed study by the Mathematical Association of America outlined the main points for improving Calculus education for STEM students based on the experience of teaching math in the USA. In this paper, we expand this study with the best calculus teaching practices from multiple countries. Our methodology initially followed the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) study and then was significantly modified due to the difference between school and University education. We started by comparing the practices of two countries with traditionally different education systems. We described and analyzed factual differences and similarities of content, pedagogy and socio economics, based on an adjusted to higher education international comparison system developed by Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development for high school education. We outlined our work on culturally independent comparison methods with a goal of improving or adjusting Calculus education.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving STEM’s Calculus education using cross-countries best teaching practices\",\"authors\":\"G. Grabarnik, L. Kim-Tyan, Serge Yaskolko\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recently completed study by the Mathematical Association of America outlined the main points for improving Calculus education for STEM students based on the experience of teaching math in the USA. In this paper, we expand this study with the best calculus teaching practices from multiple countries. Our methodology initially followed the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) study and then was significantly modified due to the difference between school and University education. We started by comparing the practices of two countries with traditionally different education systems. We described and analyzed factual differences and similarities of content, pedagogy and socio economics, based on an adjusted to higher education international comparison system developed by Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development for high school education. We outlined our work on culturally independent comparison methods with a goal of improving or adjusting Calculus education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

美国数学协会最近完成的一项研究,根据美国数学教学的经验,概述了改善STEM学生微积分教育的要点。在本文中,我们以多个国家的最佳微积分教学实践来扩展这一研究。我们的方法最初遵循国际学生评估项目(PISA)研究,然后由于学校和大学教育的差异而进行了重大修改。我们首先比较了两个传统上教育制度不同的国家的做法。我们基于经济合作与发展组织为高中教育开发的调整后的高等教育国际比较系统,描述和分析了内容、教学法和社会经济学的事实异同。我们概述了我们在文化独立比较方法方面的工作,目的是改善或调整微积分教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving STEM’s Calculus education using cross-countries best teaching practices
A recently completed study by the Mathematical Association of America outlined the main points for improving Calculus education for STEM students based on the experience of teaching math in the USA. In this paper, we expand this study with the best calculus teaching practices from multiple countries. Our methodology initially followed the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) study and then was significantly modified due to the difference between school and University education. We started by comparing the practices of two countries with traditionally different education systems. We described and analyzed factual differences and similarities of content, pedagogy and socio economics, based on an adjusted to higher education international comparison system developed by Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development for high school education. We outlined our work on culturally independent comparison methods with a goal of improving or adjusting Calculus education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信