谁该为气候变化负责?基于国家层面气候债务估算的新证据

Benedict Clements, S. Gupta, Jianhong Liu
{"title":"谁该为气候变化负责?基于国家层面气候债务估算的新证据","authors":"Benedict Clements, S. Gupta, Jianhong Liu","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.bcle","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Persistent increases in average global temperatures, in the absence of mitigation policies, risk catastrophic climate change as well as reduced world GDP per capita. In the absence of policy changes, fossil fuel consumption and global CO2 emissions are projected to continue to rise, with an increase in global CO2 emissions of 4 percent by 2030 relative to 2019. Over the longer term, even scenarios that maintain global emissions at present levels, before dropping after 2050, are troubling. For example, the intermediate scenario of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts an increase in average global temperatures from the present 1.2 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial average (1850–1900) to an average of 2 degrees in 2041–60 and 2.7 degrees in 2081–2100. In order to avoid the adverse consequences of this scenario of increasing global temperatures, a number of countries have pledged to reduce emissions beyond their initial commitments in the 2015 Paris Agreement (COP21). under which countries agreed to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees relative to pre-industrial levels and aim for 1.5 degrees. Under the present framework, mitigation pledges in countries’ nationally developed contributions (NDCs) are voluntary. However, pledges would only cut global emissions by 1/3–2/3 of the reductions consistent with Paris warming targets. As such, there is a large gap between what countries have committed to do and what needs to be done. In this context, a key issue in deciding which countries should do more is an assessment of which countries have contributed the most to climate change (through their CO2 emissions) and its associated economic damages. The total sum of these damages can be conceptualized as a “climate debt” in the sense that these costs have been imposed on the globe without any compensation. This paper seeks to contribute to this debate by providing an assessment of the climate debt of each country, based not only on historical emissions, but emissions that are likely in the near future. These estimates could be used to address the appropriate size of climate finance assistance, where countries with large climate debt may be seen as needing to contribute proportionately more to these efforts.","PeriodicalId":194500,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who's Responsible for Climate Change? New Evidence Based on Country-level Estimates of Climate Debt\",\"authors\":\"Benedict Clements, S. Gupta, Jianhong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.bcle\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Persistent increases in average global temperatures, in the absence of mitigation policies, risk catastrophic climate change as well as reduced world GDP per capita. In the absence of policy changes, fossil fuel consumption and global CO2 emissions are projected to continue to rise, with an increase in global CO2 emissions of 4 percent by 2030 relative to 2019. Over the longer term, even scenarios that maintain global emissions at present levels, before dropping after 2050, are troubling. For example, the intermediate scenario of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts an increase in average global temperatures from the present 1.2 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial average (1850–1900) to an average of 2 degrees in 2041–60 and 2.7 degrees in 2081–2100. In order to avoid the adverse consequences of this scenario of increasing global temperatures, a number of countries have pledged to reduce emissions beyond their initial commitments in the 2015 Paris Agreement (COP21). under which countries agreed to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees relative to pre-industrial levels and aim for 1.5 degrees. Under the present framework, mitigation pledges in countries’ nationally developed contributions (NDCs) are voluntary. However, pledges would only cut global emissions by 1/3–2/3 of the reductions consistent with Paris warming targets. As such, there is a large gap between what countries have committed to do and what needs to be done. In this context, a key issue in deciding which countries should do more is an assessment of which countries have contributed the most to climate change (through their CO2 emissions) and its associated economic damages. The total sum of these damages can be conceptualized as a “climate debt” in the sense that these costs have been imposed on the globe without any compensation. This paper seeks to contribute to this debate by providing an assessment of the climate debt of each country, based not only on historical emissions, but emissions that are likely in the near future. These estimates could be used to address the appropriate size of climate finance assistance, where countries with large climate debt may be seen as needing to contribute proportionately more to these efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.bcle\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.bcle","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果不采取减缓政策,全球平均气温持续上升就有可能造成灾难性气候变化以及世界人均国内生产总值下降。如果不改变政策,预计化石燃料消费和全球二氧化碳排放量将继续上升,到2030年全球二氧化碳排放量将比2019年增加4%。从长远来看,即使是全球排放量维持在目前水平,并在2050年后下降的情景,也令人不安。例如,政府间气候变化专门委员会的中间情景预测,全球平均气温将从目前比工业化前平均水平(1850-1900年)高出1.2摄氏度,到2041-60年平均上升2摄氏度,到2081-2100年平均上升2.7摄氏度。为了避免全球气温上升的不利后果,一些国家已承诺在2015年《巴黎协定》(COP21)的最初承诺基础上减少排放。根据该协议,各国同意将全球变暖控制在相对于工业化前水平远低于2摄氏度的水平,并将目标定为1.5摄氏度。在目前的框架下,各国在国家发达贡献(NDCs)中的减排承诺是自愿的。然而,这些承诺只能将全球排放量减少1/3至2/3,与巴黎气候变暖目标一致。因此,各国承诺采取的行动与需要采取的行动之间存在巨大差距。在这种情况下,决定哪些国家应该做得更多的一个关键问题是评估哪些国家对气候变化(通过其二氧化碳排放)及其相关的经济损失贡献最大。这些损失的总和可以被概念化为“气候债务”,因为这些成本是强加给全球的,没有任何补偿。本文不仅基于历史排放量,而且基于不久的将来可能的排放量,通过对每个国家的气候债务进行评估,试图为这场辩论做出贡献。这些估计可用于解决气候融资援助的适当规模问题,在这些问题上,拥有巨额气候债务的国家可能被视为需要按比例增加对这些努力的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who's Responsible for Climate Change? New Evidence Based on Country-level Estimates of Climate Debt
Persistent increases in average global temperatures, in the absence of mitigation policies, risk catastrophic climate change as well as reduced world GDP per capita. In the absence of policy changes, fossil fuel consumption and global CO2 emissions are projected to continue to rise, with an increase in global CO2 emissions of 4 percent by 2030 relative to 2019. Over the longer term, even scenarios that maintain global emissions at present levels, before dropping after 2050, are troubling. For example, the intermediate scenario of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts an increase in average global temperatures from the present 1.2 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial average (1850–1900) to an average of 2 degrees in 2041–60 and 2.7 degrees in 2081–2100. In order to avoid the adverse consequences of this scenario of increasing global temperatures, a number of countries have pledged to reduce emissions beyond their initial commitments in the 2015 Paris Agreement (COP21). under which countries agreed to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees relative to pre-industrial levels and aim for 1.5 degrees. Under the present framework, mitigation pledges in countries’ nationally developed contributions (NDCs) are voluntary. However, pledges would only cut global emissions by 1/3–2/3 of the reductions consistent with Paris warming targets. As such, there is a large gap between what countries have committed to do and what needs to be done. In this context, a key issue in deciding which countries should do more is an assessment of which countries have contributed the most to climate change (through their CO2 emissions) and its associated economic damages. The total sum of these damages can be conceptualized as a “climate debt” in the sense that these costs have been imposed on the globe without any compensation. This paper seeks to contribute to this debate by providing an assessment of the climate debt of each country, based not only on historical emissions, but emissions that are likely in the near future. These estimates could be used to address the appropriate size of climate finance assistance, where countries with large climate debt may be seen as needing to contribute proportionately more to these efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信