COALIA:评估脑电源连通性的基本真理

S. Allouch, Mahmoud Hassan, M. Yochum, Joan Duprez, M. Khalil, F. Wendling, J. Modolo, A. Kabbara
{"title":"COALIA:评估脑电源连通性的基本真理","authors":"S. Allouch, Mahmoud Hassan, M. Yochum, Joan Duprez, M. Khalil, F. Wendling, J. Modolo, A. Kabbara","doi":"10.1109/ICABME53305.2021.9604833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past years, the emergent method called \"electroencephalography (EEG) source connectivity\" has gained increased interest due to its ability to identify large-scale brain networks with satisfactory spatio-temporal resolution. However, many related methodological questions remain unanswered and no consensus has been reached yet over a unified EEG source connectivity pipeline. The objective evaluation of the pipeline is challenged by the absence of a ground truth when dealing with real EEG data. In this paper, we show how a recently developed, large-scale, physiologically-grounded computational model, named COALIA, can provide such \"ground-truth\" models by generating cortical and scalp-level realistic simulations of brain activity. We investigated the effect of three factors involved in the \"EEG source connectivity\" pipeline: the number of EEG sensors, the solution of the inverse problem, and the functional connectivity measure, in the context of epileptiform activity. Results showed that increasing the number of electrodes (at least channels) leads to a higher accuracy of the reconstructed cortical networks, and that the weighted minimum norm estimate (wMNE) combined with the weighted phase lag index (wPLI) has the best performance at high electrode density. Although we believe that these results are context-specific, the model-based approach presented in this paper can be extended to address other methodological aspects of the EEG source connectivity pipeline in different contexts. We aim at presenting a proof-of-concept of the potential use of COALIA in the optimization the EEG source connectivity pipeline.","PeriodicalId":294393,"journal":{"name":"2021 Sixth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COALIA: a ground-truth for the evaluation of the EEG source connectivity\",\"authors\":\"S. Allouch, Mahmoud Hassan, M. Yochum, Joan Duprez, M. Khalil, F. Wendling, J. Modolo, A. Kabbara\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICABME53305.2021.9604833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past years, the emergent method called \\\"electroencephalography (EEG) source connectivity\\\" has gained increased interest due to its ability to identify large-scale brain networks with satisfactory spatio-temporal resolution. However, many related methodological questions remain unanswered and no consensus has been reached yet over a unified EEG source connectivity pipeline. The objective evaluation of the pipeline is challenged by the absence of a ground truth when dealing with real EEG data. In this paper, we show how a recently developed, large-scale, physiologically-grounded computational model, named COALIA, can provide such \\\"ground-truth\\\" models by generating cortical and scalp-level realistic simulations of brain activity. We investigated the effect of three factors involved in the \\\"EEG source connectivity\\\" pipeline: the number of EEG sensors, the solution of the inverse problem, and the functional connectivity measure, in the context of epileptiform activity. Results showed that increasing the number of electrodes (at least channels) leads to a higher accuracy of the reconstructed cortical networks, and that the weighted minimum norm estimate (wMNE) combined with the weighted phase lag index (wPLI) has the best performance at high electrode density. Although we believe that these results are context-specific, the model-based approach presented in this paper can be extended to address other methodological aspects of the EEG source connectivity pipeline in different contexts. We aim at presenting a proof-of-concept of the potential use of COALIA in the optimization the EEG source connectivity pipeline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Sixth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Sixth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABME53305.2021.9604833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Sixth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABME53305.2021.9604833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,一种名为“脑电图(EEG)源连接”的新兴方法因其能够以令人满意的时空分辨率识别大规模大脑网络而受到越来越多的关注。然而,许多相关的方法问题仍未得到解决,对于统一的脑电图源连接管道尚未达成共识。在处理真实的脑电图数据时,由于缺乏基本事实,对管道的客观评价受到了挑战。在本文中,我们展示了一个最近发展起来的、大规模的、以生理为基础的计算模型,名为COALIA,如何通过生成皮层和头皮水平的大脑活动的真实模拟来提供这样的“基础真相”模型。在癫痫样活动的背景下,我们研究了涉及“脑电图源连接”管道的三个因素的影响:脑电图传感器的数量、反问题的解和功能连接测量。结果表明,增加电极数量(至少通道数)可以提高重建皮层网络的精度,并且在高电极密度下,加权最小范数估计(wMNE)与加权相位滞后指数(wPLI)相结合具有最佳的性能。尽管我们认为这些结果是特定于上下文的,但本文提出的基于模型的方法可以扩展到解决不同上下文中脑电图源连接管道的其他方法学方面。我们的目标是提出COALIA在优化EEG源连接管道中的潜在用途的概念验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COALIA: a ground-truth for the evaluation of the EEG source connectivity
In the past years, the emergent method called "electroencephalography (EEG) source connectivity" has gained increased interest due to its ability to identify large-scale brain networks with satisfactory spatio-temporal resolution. However, many related methodological questions remain unanswered and no consensus has been reached yet over a unified EEG source connectivity pipeline. The objective evaluation of the pipeline is challenged by the absence of a ground truth when dealing with real EEG data. In this paper, we show how a recently developed, large-scale, physiologically-grounded computational model, named COALIA, can provide such "ground-truth" models by generating cortical and scalp-level realistic simulations of brain activity. We investigated the effect of three factors involved in the "EEG source connectivity" pipeline: the number of EEG sensors, the solution of the inverse problem, and the functional connectivity measure, in the context of epileptiform activity. Results showed that increasing the number of electrodes (at least channels) leads to a higher accuracy of the reconstructed cortical networks, and that the weighted minimum norm estimate (wMNE) combined with the weighted phase lag index (wPLI) has the best performance at high electrode density. Although we believe that these results are context-specific, the model-based approach presented in this paper can be extended to address other methodological aspects of the EEG source connectivity pipeline in different contexts. We aim at presenting a proof-of-concept of the potential use of COALIA in the optimization the EEG source connectivity pipeline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信