实例级评审图是否支持信息物理系统规范的验证过程:来自受控实验的结果

Marian Daun, Jennifer Brings, Thorsten Weyer
{"title":"实例级评审图是否支持信息物理系统规范的验证过程:来自受控实验的结果","authors":"Marian Daun, Jennifer Brings, Thorsten Weyer","doi":"10.1145/3379177.3388893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of safety-critical systems, manual reviews are important to ensure high-quality software and to satisfy legal obligations. When applying model-based engineering approaches, no longer are only textual requirements specifications or software code under review, but also model-based specification artifacts like behavioral requirements models. As such behavioral specifications are typically documented on a type-level, errors concerning the interactions between multiple system instances can go unnoticed in manual reviews. This is particularly the case when multiple system instances of the same system type are interacting during runtime, which is typical for cyber-physical systems where networks of cyber-physical systems form dynamically to fulfill an overall purpose. In this paper, we report on a controlled experiment whose results indicate that instance-level review diagrams have – compared to type-level diagrams – important positive effects on reviewing processes for behavioral specifications of cyber-physical systems. Specifically, the experiment provides empirical evidence that instance-level review diagrams are significantly more expressive and effective than type-level diagrams.","PeriodicalId":299473,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Instance-level Review Diagrams Support Validation Processes of Cyber-Physical System Specifications : Results from a Controlled Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Marian Daun, Jennifer Brings, Thorsten Weyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3379177.3388893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the field of safety-critical systems, manual reviews are important to ensure high-quality software and to satisfy legal obligations. When applying model-based engineering approaches, no longer are only textual requirements specifications or software code under review, but also model-based specification artifacts like behavioral requirements models. As such behavioral specifications are typically documented on a type-level, errors concerning the interactions between multiple system instances can go unnoticed in manual reviews. This is particularly the case when multiple system instances of the same system type are interacting during runtime, which is typical for cyber-physical systems where networks of cyber-physical systems form dynamically to fulfill an overall purpose. In this paper, we report on a controlled experiment whose results indicate that instance-level review diagrams have – compared to type-level diagrams – important positive effects on reviewing processes for behavioral specifications of cyber-physical systems. Specifically, the experiment provides empirical evidence that instance-level review diagrams are significantly more expressive and effective than type-level diagrams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3379177.3388893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3379177.3388893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在安全关键系统领域,人工审查对于确保高质量的软件和满足法律义务非常重要。当应用基于模型的工程方法时,审查的不再只是文本需求规范或软件代码,还包括基于模型的规范工件,如行为需求模型。由于这样的行为规范通常是在类型级别上进行记录的,因此在手动审查中可能不会注意到涉及多个系统实例之间交互的错误。当相同系统类型的多个系统实例在运行时交互时尤其如此,这对于动态形成网络物理系统网络以实现总体目的的网络物理系统来说是典型的。在本文中,我们报告了一项对照实验,其结果表明,与类型级图相比,实例级审查图对网络物理系统行为规范的审查过程具有重要的积极作用。具体来说,实验提供了经验证据,表明实例级评审图明显比类型级评审图更具表现力和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Instance-level Review Diagrams Support Validation Processes of Cyber-Physical System Specifications : Results from a Controlled Experiment
In the field of safety-critical systems, manual reviews are important to ensure high-quality software and to satisfy legal obligations. When applying model-based engineering approaches, no longer are only textual requirements specifications or software code under review, but also model-based specification artifacts like behavioral requirements models. As such behavioral specifications are typically documented on a type-level, errors concerning the interactions between multiple system instances can go unnoticed in manual reviews. This is particularly the case when multiple system instances of the same system type are interacting during runtime, which is typical for cyber-physical systems where networks of cyber-physical systems form dynamically to fulfill an overall purpose. In this paper, we report on a controlled experiment whose results indicate that instance-level review diagrams have – compared to type-level diagrams – important positive effects on reviewing processes for behavioral specifications of cyber-physical systems. Specifically, the experiment provides empirical evidence that instance-level review diagrams are significantly more expressive and effective than type-level diagrams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信