{"title":"物联网所需网络资源与HTTP、MQTT的比较","authors":"T. Yokotani, Yuya Sasaki","doi":"10.1109/ICCEREC.2016.7814989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HTTP has been widely applied for data transfer. However, in networks for IoT, this protocol causes a large overhead. To solve this problem, named based transfer protocols have been discussed. This paper compares the performance of HTTP with that of MQTT, a type of named based transfer protocol. Additionally, the paper proposes enhancements to MQTT for better performance.","PeriodicalId":431878,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Control, Electronics, Renewable Energy and Communications (ICCEREC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"155","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison with HTTP and MQTT on required network resources for IoT\",\"authors\":\"T. Yokotani, Yuya Sasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCEREC.2016.7814989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"HTTP has been widely applied for data transfer. However, in networks for IoT, this protocol causes a large overhead. To solve this problem, named based transfer protocols have been discussed. This paper compares the performance of HTTP with that of MQTT, a type of named based transfer protocol. Additionally, the paper proposes enhancements to MQTT for better performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Conference on Control, Electronics, Renewable Energy and Communications (ICCEREC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"155\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Conference on Control, Electronics, Renewable Energy and Communications (ICCEREC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEREC.2016.7814989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Control, Electronics, Renewable Energy and Communications (ICCEREC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEREC.2016.7814989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison with HTTP and MQTT on required network resources for IoT
HTTP has been widely applied for data transfer. However, in networks for IoT, this protocol causes a large overhead. To solve this problem, named based transfer protocols have been discussed. This paper compares the performance of HTTP with that of MQTT, a type of named based transfer protocol. Additionally, the paper proposes enhancements to MQTT for better performance.